cewekeds

Pazaak is so much better in KOTOR 2 because i win most of the time. The best cards 2&4 or 3&6 cards that makes cards negative. Then win by getting 9 cards. :D

A game that re-enacts the JFK shooting? That's pretty f*cking sick. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I thought the same thing at first. When I thought about it its no worst then movies or books done for profit. If it gets people to study history and learn about history I don't see the problem.

Bullets can change direction in the human body. Its because liquids in our body that can add uneven pressure on the projectile. You also bullets bouncing off bones that can change the path. You can always try yourself. http://www.jfkreloaded.com/start/

If Yoda wasn't a quitter.

How about the people that see Mary or a saint in things. Like toast, window stains, pee stains on sheets. Or a Mary statue that bleeds or cry. I watch a progam on discover telling how some of these things are done but not all. The real scary part people sell this items on ebay for thousands of dollars. Do ghost really exist? I have to say yes because more then once I think notice objects in rooms that disappear when I focus on them. maybe its just tricks with light and shadows or the objects has a somebody else problem shield. coincidences between Abraham Lincoln and John F Kennedy http://www.open.org/~hughesa/humor/presidents.htm

I think Mace could take Sidious because his one bad mother******.

Younglings, cewekeds. They're called younglings. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> rofl

Its for the kids.

reaching Level 58 on Tetris. when I beat Romance of the Three Kingdoms 3.

Isn't star wars about a man who lost his way into evil however was able to change and be saved before he died.

Castlevania: Symphony of the Night Dig dug(still play it) Kotor 1

That makes sense however what if Archmonarch needs to go back in time to meet himself to explain how to time travel to himself?

When it comes to time travel I always think of the futurama where Fry goes back in time and knocks up his grand ma. :D But how would you know? If you go back in time and kill your father then you would never be born. Then you wouldn't be able to kill your father. Maybe this just repeat itself over and over until you decide let the old man live. Then you only remember that route in time travel. But how about buying stock so when your return your rich? I can still do that right.

due to your utter failure to address the issue at hand. Only by completely ignoring the commentary of the other person where it does not suit you can your position have any validity. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I didn't ignore I told where I got secert wife from. now I understand what gots you upset and I'm sorry.

so I twisted a argument by calling wife that somebody made vow to alone by calling her secert wife. At less secert to the goverment. " but you post. because I asked you your thoughts or anwser your question?

trying to see your point.. But didn't you just twist what I said? so good job.

Being married to someone doesn't necessarily mean you will spend the rest of your life with someone. By the same token, you could spend the rest of your life with someone even if you didn't have a bit of paper that made you legally married. Why does the bit of paper matter? If I whisper my vows to a girl when we are alone on a mountainside, should that have less meaning than if I say them in a church or a registry office? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Reveilled want a reason why registry office needed to know who your wife was. You need the paperwork to prove your married under the court of law. The family and friends might know but without the paper other people probably won't risk letter the wife see her husband. Thats were the secert wife came from. The vow doesn't have less meaning though. If you think its a deluded view then why does the goverment give tax break to marry people? Why do marry people have more rights to each other then long time friendship?

Really don't see that but thanks for your input. Its better to prove your point by insults? How did I twisted ever argument? Reveilled I understand your points and some I even agree with. However I do believe for legal reason you must do things the goverment way to protect your love ones. That includes the paperwork. When people marry it has been taken for granted that they share responsibilities over each other.

No. However this very arguement is reason Texas has stop gay people from adapting adn also trying to remove the kids of gay couples. There is studies that support both groups. But it is because you go into coma you wife you told nobody about has very little rights. You assign Springing power of attorney however power of attorney has limits and your family could possible take your unknown wife to court. equals years of suffering for her and the family. No there are more then one reason for encourage marriage. which you are unable to think of. True but we only give that tax break after the kid is born. Since most people judge there furture by their present take home income. Plus the tax break you get for a kid does not eqaul the money you would spend on a kid. There was probably a form of tax in those tribe. I'm bigger and stronger and leader I get first choice of the food and women. You will guard the tribe at night if you want to stay. taxation is just the supplies put in to make organised government work. we use money but other things have worth also. Its still true. Are you saying its easier for married people to move then single people? I've been single and I only worried about myself however when you get involved with person you care about you think of them also when I make choices. I What happens if you two don't agree. Your secert wife sol while you give your house life savings over to other secert wife. What if the house is in your wife's name and she dies your kids hate you and kick you out of the house you help pay for. what if it happens before you two sit down and make a will? Your not being discriminated against for being single. You have not made a commentment to anybody yet. If your the doctor how can they decide what status of relateship your in with a person. Its easy to presume your parents love you and your family have strong bonds with you. They could be wrong but its a safe call. Instead you want bob to hang out with you and they can only go with bob word. Bob could be lying and really just showed up for other reason or you don't want bob there how is the doctor to know?. If you have a know wife and there is a paper stating the fact the doctor can presume that there is a good bond between you two. the doctor could be wrong but its a safe call. How come there two restrooms? You cannot give people special treatment because of thier marital status. It's wrong Really what does it mean to be married to you? For me it means the joining of two life who will work as team and build their future together. For right or wrong the goverment think tanks believe married people are needed and willing to help couples. I tend to agree that marry people are good thing to have and don't mind giving them a small break. I also think its important to protect your love one from heart aches and make thing easier for people in love who choose to share their life together. I disagree with the goverment saying only man and woman are allowed to choose to build a life together. I really don't have problem with people having many husband or wiives. However it doesn't look good when most of the spokepeople is one man with 10 wives and 30 kids all on welfare. I don't mind goverment helping people down on their luck but I don't like blanten taking advantage of. If you really think its unfair then sue and the courts can decide.

It depends on the studies and the ones I read a kids grow up and more succecsful that are raised by two parent households. it doesn't but how is the goverment, doctors, lawyers, family and friends to know you choosed to spend the rest of your life with this person. Sure you can tell them but people lie. what if your injured and your parents hate the girl and say she has no rights to you. If you had that paper making the claim then she has something to show people. However i said there are more then one reason the goverment encourage marriage and kids are only one part. Kids cost money so the tax break might be enough extra for two people to have one. no since the first tribe a form of goverment has been around. Even animals herds have a form of goverment and ways to decide who mates. But it still true single people are more likely to move. theres 3% different but that eqauls a couple million people. I never said married people don't move but less likely to move. However if your married its not your stuff it belongs to both of you. They have they paperwork its called marriage certificate that is used for many things when two people form as one unit. They have let there family, goverment, lawyers, doctor and friends know they want to live together for this life and have the paperwork to prove it. You can do lot paperwork and get alot of the same rights married people have but you have allot more paperwork to do and keep track of. Gay people should have the right to that marriage certificate if they are making the same statement. I agree people don't do what the goverment plans or encourage with the tax break but as whole it seems to work. I also think some of this ideas are outdated and reasoning. But I can see the thinking behind the ideas.

True however most people believe children are raise better in a two parent home. I'll take a guess but I bet there is more children that started out in a two parent home then not. True by couple in then context is two people that have choose to marry or comment themselves to each other for life(plans are fliting things. Not just boyfriend and girlfriend who have not decide to live their futurn together. True some couples don't have kids but that just means more money to spend which creats jobs and make up for the tax we lost. 4. However two people probably won't have kids together unless they are planning to live and share their life together which is civil union. True they don't piece of paper but they don't have to be couple either with a kid. And every since their been a goverment in history its been giving breaks to married people and making it easier for them to have children because that would equal followers. Thats why many goverments gave wifes very little rights so the men could force sex on their wives without worry. http://www.census.gov/prod/2003pubs/censr-12.pdf If you choose to live your life together then your less likely to turn somebody you love life upside down. The status of the relationship is important. Reason they have not become a union yet or never. Couples that have choosen to join their life and income and hardwork together have more rights then just a boyfriend and girlfriend. Not all couples are equal. would you allow the court to give control over to person you only been dating 2 weeks? that person then gets to choose where your money goes, if you live or die. The old men can and should have the paperwork which would allow his best friend to visits same with the girlfriend and boyfriend.

Just give me a large holodeck and high speed internet connection.

If two people choose to join forces they tend to do better then if they work alone. many things are likly to happen. Kids the couple most likly will raise which will give the country a population and pay for your SS medicare in the future. They also will be the people incharge of the country to makes sure iit exsist in the future. the kids will also be needed to join are military to help protect us from threats that might come when we're to old to fight. Stablity in a town, state and country. Couples are less likely to move which gives towns and cities a steady flow of money coming in. This pays for roads, firefighters, police, schools, military, etc... Couples are more likly to buy a house in town which is why they don't move as much. To have steady trade you need towns and cities to make and recieve goods. this will bring in more money then the goverment would lose from the taxes. I'm using "marriage" as civil union for that is what they are. I never say gay marriage because with over %50 divorce rate it doesn't seem that happy. If the goverment gives a break to one couple then they should allow any human couple group set the same break.

However the goverement not choosen to make its self stronger but the country. The goverment is ran by the people for the people and to maintain our freedom and life style the people we choose have to make chooses that will keep the country growing and allow it to protect the people who run it. Nobodies force to go to church past the age of 18. If you are unable to get a job in your town because you don't belong to the local church call the ACLU. Churches also tend to feed the and help the poor another reason its ok not to pay taxes. Beside churchs are not the only ones not payin taxes. http://www.eaa.org/chapters/resources/refe...%20Chapter.html I don't polygamist could still get married but the goverment would only reward two in that marriage. If you had for males married together then you could have two sets of union. So uneven couples might have problem. but the Civil union was design for two people. I really wouldn't care but things come in small steps. If you don't think the goverment should do things to secure itself and plan for the future then I guess your againest public schools also.

If the goverment see unions to help keep it strong and decides to give breaks to two (and only two) people who form the union then it can takes steps to encourage those unions to happen. If those unions happen in religion content like marriage and the goverment choose to recognize those religion union in the term of marriage. Which they have with laws using marriage as its wording. Then the goverment should recognize all religion beliefs whose word for their union is marriage. Union only recognize two humans joining. Its fair and it doesn't support one group over other. Unlike now saying one groups can have the rights and another group can't. One might argue that the reason the goverment wants unions is to help sustain/increase the population and gay couples can't have babies. Again false because gay woman can have babies just not with their partner. Gay males can also pay a woman to bare their child as well. Also you would have to enforce the law on couples who don't produce or raise children. The goverment chooses not to taxs churches and other groups they believe are good at shaping morales and forming communities to make the country more stable.However these groups suppose to stay neutral politics because of the help they recieves.