I'd like to point out that the scientists who push "Intelligent Design" (ugh) are few and far between. The vast majority of reputable scientists won't go anywhere near religion, except when they're forced into it by the weirdoes who think that if we teach our children the truth of evolution, they'll lose their religious beliefs. Anyone whose religious beliefs can be destroyed by scientific fact doesn't have much faith to begin with. Imagine teaching physics without gravity or relativity - that's what teaching biology without evolution is like, if not more so.
As for "the moral foundation of the universe", um, there isn't one. We know in America that it's totally, utterly, completely wrong to murder a woman because she was "shamed" by being raped. In India and the Middle East, that is not so. We know that slavery is wrong - that hasn't been true throughout most of humanity's written history. Many of us know that killing animals for their fur, attempting to control reproductive rights, not allowing homosexuals to marry, and leaving your turn signal on while driving in the left lane 5 miles under the speed limit are all reprehensible. Everyone doesn't agree. Even incest, that "universal taboo", has had its adherents throughout history in the upper classes. "Pure blood" and all that rot. C.S. Lewis was a wonderful author and quite a good philosopher, but that's all.
God, or Nirvana, or the spirit world, or whatever, is neither provable nor disprovable. I like Pascal's theory: he decided that he'd get in very big trouble if he didn't believe in God but s/he turned out to exist. If there wasn't a god, no big deal. But if there was and he had no faith, he'd be in trouble after he died. Covered his bases quite well B)