Chilloutman

warning, visual

If it IS and illegal weapon that begs the question "how did he get it". So that detail is important. How does anyone protect themselves anywhere these days? In Spain and France terrorists are killing innocent people with vehicles now. which seems to be less dangerous than guns You are kidding here right?

I kinda liked outdoorsman in Fallout

really? some of them looks already drowned

what interest me is if he got licence to carry. If he got than US seriously need to re-evaluate how often you need to renew it....

well kinda like this:

just downloading

hmm fun in UK: Overall, only a minor 28% of the population agrees that migrants and/or refugees from the Arab world are beneficial to Europe/Britain. 63% of British respondents feel that Arabs who migrated to the UK have failed to integrate in Western societies and live in isolated communities. https://docs.google.com/viewerng/viewer?url=http://www.arabnews.com/sites/default/files/pdf/topline_pdf_finalx.pdf

Woot?

Is it really fair to put the Panthers on one level with Nazis and the KKK? and commies, don't forget commies

well I'd argue we reached a Toke where conquest isn't the economically ideal mode of immigration depends on where you emigrating from Haven't noticed any armies marching into Europe lately, Crimea aside (and I don't think that qualifies as different cultures). Well I read some discussion with professor of French Constitutional Law Olivier Beaud and he mentioned that they will have to conquer their suburbs back and there is martial law for 2 years + in France so yeah feel free to use some web translator: http://zpravy.idnes.cz/olivier-beaud-rozhovor-francie-vyjimecny-stav-macron-terorismus-p9o-/zahranicni.aspx?c=A170915_150939_zahranicni_kha

well I'd argue we reached a Toke where conquest isn't the economically ideal mode of immigration depends on where you emigrating from

Yeah I am fine with culture I have, I would rather skip that conquest part during my lifespan

well, that cultural exange usually ended or started with conquest

LOL So, commies are relevant enough for you to note that almost all of them are (even though not really), but Franco isn't because... "he was kinda dictator as his opposed commies" (?). And Salazar neither because, uh... Of course, I forget: pointing out commie dictatorships is always relevant. what? I pointed them about because they are irelevant as Africa leaders which I noted, seriously, do you need to be still the smartass? I even can't probably decypher that sentence properly

well, he is still elected and Russia is more like oligarchy? Not sure, not expert on Russia

I know but as he mentioned non-monarch I kinda pud that connection in, he didn't say he don't want commie dictators either. Pardon me if it was far fetched expectation

Why is Franco not relevant ? Well since he was kinda dictator as his opposed commies I mentioned previously he doesn't sound that relevant to me when compared to democratically elected leaders but I never stated he si not from Europe. Count him in if you want, no problem for me

well, since its really not clear to you will try to explain. 1) First there was this 'question': I wonder what the record is (non-monarch) for length of ruling a modern European country. Putin and Merkel have to be close, if not haviing set the record already. 2) Where Malcador send list of List of longest-ruling non-royal national leaders since 1900 of whole world\ to which I pointed that: almost all are from Africa, rest from commies ruled states 3) to which 213374U replied (and I must say I chukled as he again provided examples of non-europeans) Sure. Except from Franco, Salazar, Díaz, Trujillo... and I am the called bull? if you want to be the clever one, point out those which are on list and actually are relevant: Éamon de Valera Urho Kekkonen nah, whatever

Right, right. So: - "commies": Enver Hoxha, Tito, Todor Zhivkov, János Kádár, Stalin* -- rest don't count because you shifted the goalposts to admit only European countries - non-commies: Éamon de Valera, Salazar, Franco, Urho Kekkonen So, 4 (5 if you count the Soviet Union as being in Europe) commies vs... 4 non-commies. Still your original statement that "almost all are [...] commies" is bull. Care to try again? try what, what is bull? Seems like you are trying to be edgy where there is no need for it

not yet, you need to try harder my friend

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_longest-ruling_non-royal_national_leaders_since_1900 almost all are from Africa, rest from commies ruled states And? well he asked about EUROPEAN ones, thats why I pointed that our, don't be touchy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_longest-ruling_non-royal_national_leaders_since_1900 almost all are from Africa, rest from commies ruled states Sure. Except from Franco, Salazar, Díaz, Trujillo... Diaz and Trujillo are not from Europe...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_longest-ruling_non-royal_national_leaders_since_1900 almost all are from Africa, rest from commies ruled states

Sharp_one you do realize if Germany collapses Poland will be following it shortly afterwards down the economic maelstrom The EU offers the best economic future for a country like Poland, there is no realistic better alternative what EU does have to do with economics?