TrashMan
-
Posts
1516 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Everything posted by TrashMan
-
This is also why they generally tend not to offer any meaningful insight into what the wider populace thinks. I mean, you can certainly ascertain what the subgroup of "people who have access to Internet, have time to and like to fill out internet polls, and are aware of the poll in question" think, but these selection criteria are not guaranteed to grant you a representative sample. Gee, it's like you people have never heard of selection bias. What this poll tells you is that a lot of people are fed up with SJW's and radical feminists. a big backlash is happening. Polls like that are not proper scientific polls, yes. So what? It's a poll specifically for people who come to that site. In theory, it's representative of THAT. If you already now that, then why censor?
-
You are wrong, there is no "should". A poll is not a tool to get the result you want, it's to get a result that is. So a result that does not conform to what you think is "skewered" and has to be discarded? That people decide to vote like that IS the reality, you just don't want to accept it. No you wrong and I tie your spurious assertion back to the " EA was the worst American company " ever vote Worse than the big banks, the oil companies, the cigarette companies? Of course its not, its a frigging software company. How could it be worse than them, yet according to your logic " its must be the worst company ever because the poll said so ". There are factors that the poll doesn't consider so it can create an unreasonable and unrealistic result A POLL DOES NOT EXIST TO VALIDATE YOUR OPINION. You think EA is not the worst? I agree. But you know what? It doesn't matter what I think. It doesn't matter what you think either. Polls are reflective of what people who voted think at the time of voting. OF COURSE emotions factors into it. Everything does. The result is what it is. You just don't want to accept it because it clashes with what you think the result should be
-
You are wrong, there is no "should". A poll is not a tool to get the result you want, it's to get a result that is. So a result that does not conform to what you think is "skewered" and has to be discarded? That people decide to vote like that IS the reality, you just don't want to accept it.
-
Still doesn't change the fact that you avoid answering and make "joke" responses as a smokescreen.
-
WTF?F?F?F?F?FF? The world has gone mad!
-
OH MY! We must not let people know that feminism as a word lost respect and has become toxic to many! We must not let the people speak out. Quickly, hide the results! Emotional responses? What is wrong with those? You know what else is an emotional response? Indignation. You know, the thing you feel when you yell "oppression! harrassment! sexim!" They were being emotional... ha, what a cheap excuse. How would you know the mental state of every person who votes? And why would it matter in this poll any more than in every other poll in history?
-
TIME had to remove the word "feminism" from the poll of words people would like to see gone. It was wining by a landslide... 53% EDIT: The shirtgate may as well be the turning point in this war. The crazies are out for all to see now.
-
I'm rich, I'm rich, I'm rich, I'm rich, I'm rich, I'm rich, I'm rich, I'm rich, I'm rich, I'm rich, I'm rich, I'm rich, I'm rich, I'm rich, I'm rich, I'm rich, I'm rich, I'm rich, I'm rich, I'm rich, I'm rich....
-
LOL... Anit-GG tries a NEW hastag. Hashtag gets derailed and crashes in 15 minutes
-
Why wouldn't he be? On-the-spot reporting usually involves talking to people in the middle of their workplace or in the middle of work. As such, those people wear what they normally do. It is perfectly fine. There is nothing wrong with his shirt. Oppression Olymipics?
-
And I'm sorry, but it probably has pretty little to do with "SJW pressure". I'm pretty sure if he was wearing a tacky T-shirt with pink unicorns instead of one with half-naked women, his superiors also would have had a serious discussion with him about what is appropriate to wear on occasions like this. IF a company has a casual dress code, then it is appropriate. Enough of this faux crap about "you must dress this way" stick-in-the-butt assholery. Appropriate? By who's judgemnent? Yours? Well, I consider your tastes in clothing abysmal. Wrong, he wasn't apologizing to his colleagues. No colleague ever had a problem with him. Basing your worldview on superficial appearances is stupid. "looking professional" is nothing more than "looking like my imagined stereotype". Choice of clothing has NO BEARING WHATSOEVER on ones capacity to do jobs like this.
-
If you feel that harassement and pressure have no impact on a person psyche, then why get up in arms when a women gets harassed? According to you, people can't be pressured/bullied. I think it's you who are looking for a reason that would justify this redicolous "shirtgate" affair. And frankly that offends me. Now apologize.
-
How many must feel "objectified" for it to be a problem? 1? 2? 100?
-
I heard that they had a interview with a pro-GG female game dev, but they decided not to run it.
-
Dude, one of the Mojos attacked him SIMPLY FOR TRYING TO SET UP AN INTERVIEW. 5 tweet messages were harassement to her. In other news, SJW's abusing the Twitter WAM system: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B2fQw_LCIAAtLSI.jpg B.t.w. - Bruce, should anyone wearing this also be shamed and attacked?
-
I don't think it's possible to diminish it.
-
-
I'll just re-post here then SJW's getting REKKED: http://dailycaller.com/2014/11/13/the-waronnerds-how-far-left-feminists-and-the-media-created-gamergate/ http://guardianlv.com/2014/11/gamergate-exposed-a-peek-inside-and-how-i-went-native/ Also, a crazy SJW getting ultra-super-platnium mad. https://archive.today/W2kyB#selection-1115.1-1115.109 In other news, GG discusses starting up TWATTER, a un-censored version of Twitter. It's a good day to be alive.
-
OHHHH...... SJW's getting REKKED today http://dailycaller.com/2014/11/13/the-waronnerds-how-far-left-feminists-and-the-media-created-gamergate/ http://guardianlv.com/2014/11/gamergate-exposed-a-peek-inside-and-how-i-went-native/ Also, a crazy SJW getting ultra-super-platnium mad. https://archive.today/W2kyB#selection-1115.1-1115.109 It's a good day today.
-
It's the EXACT SAME THING you hypocrite. If something is wrong, then it's wrong regardless if 10 people protest or 1000. And Tomb Raider doesn't even have a historical accuracy reason for not doing it. So no, there is no contraversy, because there is no problem. There never was. The feminist shrills makes their living and get their power by breeding conflict and making a fuss over nothing, creating outrage and contraversy to fuel their careers.
-
Plenty of GameDevs support GG, but unofficially. Official support is too risky, as they risk getting balacklisted and harassed.
-
There is one crucial difference here. This isn't some random Joe saying hurtful things. This is organized journalistic media engaging in a large smear campaign. This is people peddling serious accusations, and spreading lies to the public. This is people attempting large-scale censorship. This does bloody well effect a LOT of people and in a very bad way.
-
The journos re loosing advertisers and money. The narrative is cracking, as more and more people are seeing the truth and switching sides. Heck, just today I "redpilled" 2 people. Also, Gawker lost another advertiser today. We kicked the SJZ's and radical feminist in the balls (or ovaries if you will). That alone is a worthy accomplishment.
-
There we disagree. Why should we have the same conventions and mode of behavior? I've have never visited the chans before. I thought they were the cesspool of the internet. I joined 8chan three weeks ago and I was pleasantly surprised. It's so liberating to speak freely, not having to dance on eggshells or pick words. The internet is the most free "public" place on the planet. But it's getting less so every day. More censoring, more rules, more "sanitizing". Ever watched Demolition Man? The rat-burger scene? That's me.
-
Well said. I'm not interested in their "better". furthermore, they are trying to "sanitize" the internet. I personally do not want that. I believe the internet culture is worth preserving as it is. Why? Because everything is a two-edged blade. You cannot change what is bad about it without demolishing what is good about it in the process. I do not want the internet to mimic the real world in terms of everything (standard, conventions, lack of anyonyimity, etc.) I have the real world for that. I'm quite happy with accepting the bad as a trade-off for the good.
