Opinions aside. Because 3/10 means the game is unplayable not only due to bad design but bugs and a complete failure on multiple fronts. If you are going to give a game such a low score then you really need to explain why. An example...
10 - As a rule all games should start here and then be graded on merits.
-1 - No New Game +
-1 - No Keymapping
-1 - Multiplayer camera is bad
Those are my complaints against DS3, at the moment... that sets it at a 7/10. That's passing. But there is more!
+1 - I liked the story. Short as it was I was very immersed and at the end... I craved more.
+.5 - The gameplay was solid.
+.5 - I had fun
That brings it back up to a 9/10 in my opinion, and I just illustrated why. As I said with such a low score... you really should illustrate it further. Explain why you scored it so low.
Actually reviewing video games for a living I can tell you that game reviewing is never scored like that. Most games that are reviewed are broken down by features and aspects and generally are compared to the best performer in the category. For example, DS3 would most likely be rated against and compared to Diablo 2 or maybe something more modern such as Titan Quest. In my opinion DS3 deserves a 6/10 it lacks many features that are pretty much assumed to be present in similar titles. That is a huge problem that would make the score dip down immensely. Now if Obsidian adds in persistent characters, separate cameras, separate gold, open access to modding, random loot tables for all creatures, and perhaps some random extra powerful mobs I can see that score being more around 8/10.
id have to agree with this the most all the features you mentioned SHOULD be in there but were left out if they were added the game would be 100x better.
the big question is tho CAN it be done and patched in or was our 60$ wasted and us left hangin