Jump to content
The Community Blog (An Invitation)

Oner

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    8010

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Oner

    Viability of not killing opponents?

    in Alpha Protocol: General Discussion

    Posted

    I hear ya.

    Some of the best games out there became that way because the developers decided to actually read the forums and find out what the community wanted to see in the game. In this area, Obsidian is doing a great job. In my opinion just letting a developer make a game without any sort of feedback from the people who are going to be buying the game is a huge mistake. True it can get annoying if someone fights the developer on everything, but in my defense disarming and CQC implementation are the only issues I've argued about.

    I have no problem with feedback. Feedback is good. What I meant are exaggerated/outright stupid ideas. Like, say, "hey Mr. Rorie, you know what AP should have? Space vampires from planet Cyclone-B. That would be awesome!!1!1" (Yeah, I'm exaggerating, but this was the best I could come up with right now.)

    Viability of not killing opponents?

    in Alpha Protocol: General Discussion

    Posted

    ...

    So, because there won't be a disarm ability, the CQC will be unbalanced, you have no chance in group fights, the game will suck, and Obs consists of drug addicted idiots, and they don't deserve to make games. Because there's no disarm.

     

    Don't flame me unless the game does end up having disarms. Then, off coarse, I would be the "bad guy" and I would deserve it.

    But of course you're allowed to flame Obs, because they don't make a disarm move.

     

    PS: I've got 20 bucks that says at least 2 major game reviewers bust AP for not having disarms.

    50 bucks say the game will be bashed because there is no pinkie finger animation when holding teacups.

     

    Aren't you a wee bit too obsessed with disarming? Or

    are you just trolling?

     

     

    On a different note, why do people say that they look forward to games and/or, that they're fans of the developers, then try to butt in in everything instead of just letting them make the game? I never told anyone what they should be doing and just enjoyed the games for how they were. Note, I'm not talking about suggestions, I'm talking about game mechanics, story element, etc. Like that Diablo 3 mess with the "not enough darkness" and all.

    FO: NV

    in Computer and Console

    Posted

    You mean, tell them to F YOU, smack them in the face, spank them for being bad kids, throw fruits at them, or sue them for something?

    Didn't see dialogue options for either.

    FO: NV

    in Computer and Console

    Posted

    Little Lamplight doesn't exist. Bethesda cut it from the final game, and the person who came up with it in the first place died a slow and painful death from 5 different diseases.

×
×
  • Create New...