Wrath of Dagon

And riding in a tank looking like an idiot smurf. And releasing a rapist/murderer to rape and murder again. I don't think it was even the whole debate, it was how he answered a single question about the death penalty. Good by free speech, it's been a good run. Geez, I cant believe people may consider Trump a better debater than Hilary Trump does make me laugh sometimes but he also constantly reminds me how insecure he is .....we live in an age where its considered inappropriate for Billionaires to boast about how rich they are Especially with this " anti-wealthy people " sentiment and the issues around the income gap Look at Gates and Mark Zuckerberg, there philanthropy is what defines them....not the fact they keep telling strangers how rich they are? Being douchebags is what defines them, especially Zuck. That monster literally has blood dripping from her hands, I don't know how she's got away with it for so long. Edit: Nice victory against abuse of Eminent Domain: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2016/08/05/court-strikes-down-taking-that-is-a-manifest-abuse-of-the-the-eminent-domain-power/

What do you teach in your history class Hurlshot? "We aren't sure how deeply Hitler was involved in the Holocaust"? "No one is sure if Stalin knew about the Gulags"?

Fencing rules!

A nation without borders isn't a nation at all. A nation which treats everyone in the world the same as its own citizens makes citizenship meaningless. The politicians are busy replacing the voters, and no one seems to care.

And it would be very easy to show that he did. But that's not even what Gorgon said, he said "you could make a very strong case".

@Gorgon There's no way he could've shown he didn't know about it. Milosevic wasn't in charge of the Bosnian Serbs, and the court records show he was opposed to them in many instances.

Until you get to the tax and regulation part. And gun control. And free speech, Federalism, and education. But that is the nice thing about the LP. It's got half a sandwich for everyone! Yeah, open borders and open zippers. Well they lost me on the open borders part but it would be a stretch to agree with any candidate 100%. If you ever see a "perfect" candidate let me know. Destruction of America is a pretty important issue to disagree on.

That's not what he said at all. He is talking about proving something in a court of law. Chillax. "You could make a very strong case that Hitler was not aware of the Holocaust and that he never gave any direct orders." Learn to read historian.

There was no written order found. That doesn't mean he didn't give a verbal order to Himmler, it's believed by all sane historians he did. This is what Goebbels wrote in his diary on August 19, 1941, which is the time the murders of Jews increased hugely: "We talked about the Jewish problem. The Fuhrer is convinced that his earlier prophecy in the Reichstag is proving correct, and if the Jews succeed again in provoking another world war it would end with the annihilation of the Jews. This is being proved in these weeks and months with an apparently eerie certainty. In the east the Jews must pay for this..." The Holocaust took a huge amount of Hitler's desperately needed wartime resources. The Allies knew all about it. To believe that Hitler somehow didn't you'd have to be completely delusional.

No you can't, don't lie.

Until you get to the tax and regulation part. And gun control. And free speech, Federalism, and education. But that is the nice thing about the LP. It's got half a sandwich for everyone! Yeah, open borders and open zippers.

Well, Trump just sold out and endorsed all the establishment candidates in the Republican primaries.

Unfortunately because of their hatred of parties the founders set up what turned out to be a two party system. A perfect example of the perfect being the enemy of the good.

Today's polls don't look too bad for Trump: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/ Not that polls matter much at this stage, but with all the doom and gloom and the media narrative of Trump implosion. State polls tend to be a trailing indicator since they're not taken as often, eventually they'll line up with national polls.

Supposedly the $400 Million is from an international court ruling regarding a disagreement between US-Iran dating to the late 1970s when the US agreed to back the Shah of Iran in buying arms. The US's position had been that the change of regime made the agreement null and void, whereas the international court determined the agreement was with the country and that the regime was irrelevant. This is - again supposedly - why the right has been arguing that US agreed to "accept" the international court ruling as a cover to buy off Iran to release prisoners. Mike Rogers claimed on TV that there was no ruling yet. Not sure if that's true or not. Edit: In any case they obviously tried to hide the fact that they made the payment.

The whole war against Serbia was a set up, just like the invasion of Haiti. Democrats like to help our enemies for some reason.

What gun can shoot 30 highly accurate rounds in seconds? None of which would've prevented anything. These are just ideas to harass law abiding people.

Yes, don't vote for the party that supports BLM.

Yet another argument why the two party system needs to be ended: http://www.ocregister.com/articles/party-724083-democrats-economic.html

Makes sense actually, she's the one world, corporatist candidate. Republican voters for once told the Koch brothers to shove it.

Beware of the fact checkers: http://dailycaller.com/2016/07/28/snopes-caught-lying-about-lack-of-american-flags-at-democratic-convention/

I used to live on Bio forums, but after DAO I finally gave up on Bio. By then the forums had way too many people, it wasn't any fun anyway.

That's fine, I wasn't particularly trying to argue, just surprised you have libertarian believes.

What's surprising about it? Sounds like do nothing. And yeah, I'd like to opt out of Social Security. Most younger people would (not that I'm young). It's a great deal for lower incomes, terrible for higher incomes. Where does that leave people who are on it?

I'm curious Hurlshot, what's you position on Libertarians abolishing Social Security and Medicare?