Wrath of Dagon

Today's polls don't look too bad for Trump: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/ Not that polls matter much at this stage, but with all the doom and gloom and the media narrative of Trump implosion. State polls tend to be a trailing indicator since they're not taken as often, eventually they'll line up with national polls.

Supposedly the $400 Million is from an international court ruling regarding a disagreement between US-Iran dating to the late 1970s when the US agreed to back the Shah of Iran in buying arms. The US's position had been that the change of regime made the agreement null and void, whereas the international court determined the agreement was with the country and that the regime was irrelevant. This is - again supposedly - why the right has been arguing that US agreed to "accept" the international court ruling as a cover to buy off Iran to release prisoners. Mike Rogers claimed on TV that there was no ruling yet. Not sure if that's true or not. Edit: In any case they obviously tried to hide the fact that they made the payment.

The whole war against Serbia was a set up, just like the invasion of Haiti. Democrats like to help our enemies for some reason.

What gun can shoot 30 highly accurate rounds in seconds? None of which would've prevented anything. These are just ideas to harass law abiding people.

Yes, don't vote for the party that supports BLM.

Yet another argument why the two party system needs to be ended: http://www.ocregister.com/articles/party-724083-democrats-economic.html

Makes sense actually, she's the one world, corporatist candidate. Republican voters for once told the Koch brothers to shove it.

Beware of the fact checkers: http://dailycaller.com/2016/07/28/snopes-caught-lying-about-lack-of-american-flags-at-democratic-convention/

I used to live on Bio forums, but after DAO I finally gave up on Bio. By then the forums had way too many people, it wasn't any fun anyway.

That's fine, I wasn't particularly trying to argue, just surprised you have libertarian believes.

What's surprising about it? Sounds like do nothing. And yeah, I'd like to opt out of Social Security. Most younger people would (not that I'm young). It's a great deal for lower incomes, terrible for higher incomes. Where does that leave people who are on it?

I'm curious Hurlshot, what's you position on Libertarians abolishing Social Security and Medicare?

Actually Bush abrogated the ABM treaty, you don't need agreement from Senate, that's only to ratify. Although NAFTA is probably one of those fake agreements which are designed to get around treaty requirement, so it's actually implemented through legislation. Also there's plenty of money in the budget that the president can use for whatever he sees fit, Obola certainly has. There's plenty of money in the border patrol budget to build fences where necessary, Obola has been spending that money to support illegal alien children residing in the US, as I've said.

It's been said of Churchill that he had 100 ideas a day, 4 of which were good. But hey, that's still 4 good ideas a day!

I'd be OK with some tax increases if they went to deficit reduction. But you know she's going to spend it all and then some, and leave us in a worse financial situation then even now. Are these apparent tax increases legitimate...its the first time I have heard about it but my knowledge of the American tax system and perceived changes to it is lacking But you will also end up paying extra money under Trump, for example how is the Trump Wall going to be funded? Use the money they're now spending on supporting illegal children pouring across the border.

I'd be OK with some tax increases if they went to deficit reduction. But you know she's going to spend it all and then some, and leave us in a worse financial situation than even now.

Not to worry, I'm sure Hilzilla will pick the best people for her administration: https://pjmedia.com/homeland-security/2016/07/27/exclusive-how-hillary-clinton-mainstreamed-al-qaeda-fundraiser-abdurahman-alamoudi/?singlepage=true

You mean the panhandle? I doubt that's true. The Mexico border area certainly is though. And yet the immigration numbers have levelled off... http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/11/19/5-facts-about-illegal-immigration-in-the-u-s/ Establishment lies. It might have leveled off in the worst recession years, but not overall. They've claimed the same number of illegals for over a decade now, who can believe such garbage? Edit: http://cis.org/New-Data-Immigration-Surged-in-2014-and-2015 And even that's based on manipulated government statistics, there is no objective unbiased data.

@Gorth If there are better people out there, they should've run

West Virginia and Virginia are completely different. In fact West Virginia was formed because they didn't want to leave the Union during the Civil War. West Virginia has a lot of coal miners, Virginia has a lot of government employees who live in the suburbs of Washington, D.C. HRC is their nominee. What do you think? We don't want it. 4-5 viable parties would be enough. So, tell me. Did you ever think about why there are only two viable parties? Because it's winner take all. Voting for a third party simply means you're hurting the major party you're ideologically closest to. The best way to fix it is with run-off elections, that should give us 4-5 viable parties that would be optimal. Last I heard, 60% go over the border. You'd need both a fence and someone to go looking for visa overstays. Right now we're doing neither.

The immigration police have been ordered to not only not remove illegals, but to assist them in getting to their destination of choice within the US.

Depending on the context that could be pretty damning. I guess I'll watch it. Yeah, Trump asked the Russians to travel back in time, and hack the e-mails Hilzilla deleted 2 years ago. “We don’t look to be ruled.” President pen and phone. Edit: It's funny how Obola doesn't seem to realize that for us not be "ruled", the government has to follow its own laws, else you just have tyranny.

So you want the Dems to control the Senate in case Trump tries to appoint someone to the Supreme Court who might actually defend the Constitution? OK.

David Burge @iowahawkblog New #DavePoll: which watchdog do you trust more to uncover political and governmental corruption in the US? The New York Times Putin-controlled hackers

Did you forget how you slaughtered the rest of his minions? Do you think he has unlimited resources? In fact the fight just before you get to him was fairly tough IMO.