Bokishi

Thanks kiro and nightshape

Spring updates in bold Wolfdale e8400 @ 4.0 GHz EVGA nForce 680i EVGA 8800 GTX x3 Tri-SLI 4 GB Corsair Dominators SB X-Fi Extreme Audio PCI-E 150GB RaptorX 1TB Hitachi Deskstar 1.2kw SilverStone Decathlon CoolerMaster Stacker 830 30" Dell 3007WFP-HC Windows Vista x64

I was hitting 17,600 when I had just two and the e8400. However 3DMark's default testing res is 1280x1024, and no real benefit can be seen from the 3rd 8800 until I put the res at 2560x1600 (at least crysis is now smooth as butter at that res)

Almost 18,000. I'm kind of disappointed

I'm sure you can find a buyer for the third 8800. Either that or now you have an excuse to go buy a mobo that supports 3-way SLI. It fit better than I thought lol

So I get another 8800 for my b-day. I was gonna say omg take it back I already have two, but I decided to be polite about it

Thanks guys! and add 10 to that 12 for my real age

Getting to make actual use of 4-gigs of RAM is an advantage. Crysis 64 having better mountain textures is an advantage This mod I've been playing for HL2 requires 64-bit and 4-gigs of RAM, but it's freakin amazing http://halflife2.filefront.com/file/Fakefa...0_Part_16;88111 32-bit programs and games run just as good, when I compare to running them in 32-bit XP, since 64-bit CPU is backward compatible with x86, I don't think any emulation is involved

There's no fear in going 64-bit

I didn't mean actual-real mus, just real enough to make the fantasy game world believable, and that means being able to do what you want. I'm getting sick of this topic

Realism is the pinnacle of gaming, and is what most games strive for, which is also why game system requirements keep getting higher and higher. Games will always continue to get more real in some ways as long as the realism doesn't interfere with fun (one shot deaths are no fun)

I know. The problem is that you can't say that more exploration is equal to greater graphics and as such shouldn't be a question, they are two completely different aproaches to singeplayer FPS unlike greater graphics vs. worse graphics where the difference between them is incremental. Why shouldn't I say that? They are both used to give more realism. Better visuals make a game seem more real. Flexibility let's you go where you want, which seems more real since you don't follow a scripted track in real life

Heavy foliage is ironically the place where I get the most FPS 35-40 avg. Where I get the least FPS is when it rains or snows...

Yea lets play Crackdown

The vid is saying that COD4 is following a dated formula, contrasting against modern games which are getting more and more freedom. More freedom is like better graphics; it's newer and superior. I played the first level of Crysis like 5 times, all differently. I only played the first level of COD4 once, since I saw everything the first time.

They're sold out again LAWL

Haha, I wonder if stock is permanent this time

Booo! I'm used to stand alone packs now. Is the campaign just as long?

BYO ftw

Kane's Wrath require original C&C3?

Why should I consider it anything but average? I can't think of any gameplay in crysis that was good enough to warrant it being labeled as above average. The video is stupid since it complains that COD4 isn't openended which I doubt is what infinityward was going for. I didn't watch all of it though so does it become better than that? So what you're basically saying is that freedom or no freedom, they're both the same in terms of averageness. Pretty short sighted if you ask me

I don't know what you mean that Crysis is just another average FPS, It's not a god send but it's not as average as you're making it out to be

More Crysis 4 all

Kor you should play Halo with us

my favorite game lol