Wormerine

Erdtree - just one final boss left. It might take a while. Mostly, because I am not in the mood of figuring him out at the moment. Other than that I continue delving into Calvin’s catalogue. I tried Monster Hunter: Wilds beta, and aside terrible performance it mostly confused me. Odd controls, odd gameloop. Monster Hunter: World has been on my radar for a long time, but from what I heard about it (hunt monster, craft equipment to fight tougher monsters) I worried it just might not be for me, the way Diablo-like games aren’t for me. I decided to finally give it a go, and I think I found my grindy progression game. What makes it stand out is that I actually like the combat, and I like it more the more I play. Each monster so far has its own quirks so it feels more like boss rush, rather than dull grind. I am quite amazed how much variety there is, even though Capcom smartly reuses assets for different monsters variants - but even if they have some of the same animation, they tend to fight very differently. Difficulty curve is very well handled so far. There is a lot to MH, but I didn’t find it too overwhelming. It might be my game to dip into in-between Street Fighter6. I feel like I have been missing out on Capcom.

As a consumer I have been very happy with FromSoft under Namco Bandai, so I don't see an immediate benefit to myself. The most positive thing would be reuniting Bloodborne IP with Fromsoft, allowing for a potential sequel, or perhaps finally a remaster/remake. On a flip side, that would probably mean end of day and date multiplatform releases, and while in general I don't mind waiting, I think it can be somewhat demaging for FromSoft game, where obtuse nature, and community discovery is part of the experience. That is, of course, assuming Sony would port their games to PC. While they have been moving their IPs over, Demon Souls remake is annoying absent. Whenever it is business decision, or if there is something blocking Sony from released DS on PC, I don't know. But from all Sony's IP DS and Bloodborne are two games I want to see the most. I must say, I have been rather disappointed with Sony games so far. They are not bad, but the best I can say is that they have been "alright".

Couple eyebrows raised, and while I thought Erdtree will take the cake, I am even more confused by Marvel vs. Capcom Fighting Collection as a best fighting game(s?) of the year. That's not even a remake, that's just a re-release/port. From what I understand it is a very welcome one and a great one, but still. A collection of old games shouldn't be a contender for best X game of current year.

Eh, I am curious how OW2 will do. My impression was, that Bethesda's Fallout76 fiasco generated a lot of buzz for OW, and a lot of "Fallout In space, Bethesda killer etc." headlines, in spite of devs trying really, really hard to communicated that it is not on the scale of Fallout: New Vegas. The game did get a good critical reception, and it sold reasonably well. We will see if it was a one off, or if the audience returns for the sequel.

Classes are as accessible as they come - you simplify player made builds in favour of pre-configured kits. While team-based class systems are my personal favourite, I just don’t think there is much benefit to a class system in a single character game, as there are no other equal party members to synergise with. From what Obsidian has showed my impression is that Avowed will focus more on player defined kits (choice of weapon and couple active skills), rather than more traditional “builds”. They also keep mentioning an ability to keep switching playstyles, so at least an easy access to respec is a likely possibility.

Yeah, nor did I, but frankly I bounced of it so quickly I don't see my opinion as valid. In my case, I just couldn't figure out how the game works, and had too many other things to play to boot it again.

I think it is more about scale of the title, than the design. But yes, in principle, I have no issue with a game abandoning expected features in pursuit of something new. In fact, I did like more unusual Obsidian games (like Alpha protocol). However, I am still waiting to see what makes Avowed tick. As I keep mouling over Avowed popping on Battlenet - it might be an attept to give the game more spotlight. Sure as heck it is easier to notice on Battlenet, than on a busy platform like Steam.

Yeah, I am also not quite sure what to make of Avowed just yet. I am not sure "Pillars, but like Skyrim" was ever a thing - at least not in the way that I would interpret it. The quote is from before Avowed was being worked on and the meaning of the quote might not be any deeper than "what if we do a first person game in Eora setting". The roumors had it that originally Avowed was more coop focues, but that direction was scrapped midway through development, and the game switched gears to become a more traditional singleplayer Obsidian game. So far what interviews highlighted to me that a special "Avowed" feature, is allowing less player agency than what I have come to expect from Obsidian - companions are mandatory, and our role quite strictly defined. Allegiedly, that allows to integrated companions better into the story, as one doesn't have to account for them not being with the player (or dead). However, I would think that if they pulled something extrodenary, they would try to showcase it, which I don't think have been the case so far. Eh, we will see. I am hoping for the best, expecting the worst. Let's just say, that Microsoft's track record hasn't been great. PS: Also: “Skins” for companions? I assume than, that there will be very little systemic depth to them. No inventory at least, it seems.

Huh. Interesting. Are they looking to make Battle.net, Microsoft's 2nd digital shop? As it is, Battlenet would need a serious overhaul to host more than a handful of games, and if Avowed is a one off, it is a really random one. As far as we know it doesn't even have multiplayer, right? Also pretty pricey - at £60 I am having some serious expectations. Also, £20 extra for some skins and playing "5 days earlier".

In an RPG I do, if it is an RPG with a decent amount of visual fidelity. Even in Outer Worlds, where I can't see my character in gameplay, I did appreciate having an option to make him look how I wanted to roleplay him - and seeing the avatar in the menus did reinforce the character I was roleplaying as. I can't be bothered to do much customisaiton in soulslike games though - it gets covered by armor anyway.

I mean how lite are we talking about? There is a bit more agency and build variety (so stuff like, will your rip open a door, or sneak in through the vent just around the corner). Side content is a bit more robust, and potentially allowing for more variety of approaches. Quest design isn't Deux Ex, though. Systems in Cyberpunk a more complex than in Witcher, but it is not a systemic game that allows for emergent solutions. And Cyberpunk is way too cinematic, to give players an objective, sandbox and let them loose. In the main quests you mainly follow objectives and watch cutscenes inbetween gameplay sections.

Gameplay won't blow anyone socks off, but I think it does the job for what it needs to be. The game is so well paced, that I never minded combat (unlike the original, where I grew bored of it). I wondered how I will like the 2nd playthrough, knowing the story, but I still enjoyed it thoroughly. HoD is something, and it is not even a musical highlight of the game.

Yeah, it takes time these days for me to get into those highly guided movies. I am so used to having agency (or being guided seemlesly) that when game so restrictive and so heavy handed it takes me out. Had this experience with Red Dead2 and Cyberpunk. There is enjoyment to be had once one switches the brain off and arrears it more like a movie with audience engagement.

Ouch. And I hoped the game became less buggy since I played it :-). The drop in polish after Early Access area is unfortunate. Yeah, there was a vocal audience asking for Minthara (and especially Halsin) to become companions and be romancable, so I suppose Larian listened to the fans. Personally, I found Halsin's shift from camp follower to horny companion rather jarring. I didn't appreciate him harassing my halfing and not taking no for an answer. I feel like BG3 camp could use HR.

They are not “Origin story” companions, as you can’t play as them. There are also two more potential companions to come . yes, there is a gulf of content between Origins and Joinable NPCs, especially H and M. According to what Larian said early on there was supposed to be far more Origins than the game shipped with. The suspicion is that they proved to work intensive and they padded out the roster with joinable NPC with lesser interactivity past recruitment. I don’t think it is a terrible idea, but stitches are a bit too visible me for my taste (at least in H’s case - when I played BG3 it was impossible to have Minthara and Halsin in the same playthrough).