Let's deconstruct, shall we?
So it would initially seem that your concern is regarding the posters and their perception, though you do take a moment to single out "you people." An interesting way of engaging someone of whom you are about to inquire
A rhetorical question, followed by invective- perhaps this is exposition? No specific concern yet, but some more animosity towards your subject
Rhetoric contiunued. No defined concerns or questions yet although you do allude to the issue, that the "product" is sub-par. More exposition maybe? Certainly more aspersions at Obsidian anyway...
OK, you've stopped the rhetoric, maybe we've reached the specific cause for concern....nope. although another general area of disatisfaction is PR.
Ummm. You think that the game is sub-par and that the PR is poor, and this translates to not treating customers as human beings? Thankfully, you do narrow your focus here with two specific requests, though you have yet to identify these "problems" or "hold-ups" that are referenced.
What issue? The general state of PR? The sub-par product? General problems and hold-ups? Global warming?
One doesn't often jump from exposition to conclusion, but it's an option you've taken.
Actually, this is a very applicable solution to what you've outlined. When faced with general probl,ems with no other detail or rationale; take a meeting
And that issue is a complete inability to articulate dissatisfaction in a way that ifacilitates constructive discussion