Jorian Drake

I expect you to post links, or STFU. ) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> http://www.jamaat.org/news/2005/march/4mar05_threat.html http://www.greenleft.org.au/2006/659/7227 http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/09/23/1064083001492.html http://www.infowars.com/articles/ww3/iran_..._once_again.htm http://www.redpepper.org.uk/x-%20apr06-onions.htm just some to show nitpicks (sp?) of what reactions USA has

According to your eminence only. According to what you can see/hear in the world about USA now, and to what you can find on the internet or in your friendly 'K-Mart' while shopping. Average opinion of USA is right now below that of North Korea, now that's something.

Exactly, it would have been nice to (as example) get aid in 1956 in REAL after promishes already have been made, made a lot. Instead of focusing only on the Suez crizis. So you are not anti-american but you associate americanism with idiocy? Err... okay. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I just stated the overall view of USA-s external affairs in the world of today. You can blame that mostly to one person, the guy in the White House right now.

Would you find it sensible that police were only able to prevent a killing if they are in good terms with the aggressor? And more importantly, do you think Saudi Arabia would get involved in anything because of a human catastrophe? Really, you aren't making a very good job at concealing your anti-americanism. You get points for the laugh, though. Keep it coming. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Nice that you don't understand a word of what I said, and I am not anti-american, I am anti-idioticy....even doh today in nearly everywere in the world there seems to be a pattern that these two become the same in meaning.

So, it's fine to stop genocide in Somalia but toppling a genocidal, totalitarian government is a no-no? Interesting logic, indeed. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> insert any non-muslim nation* Ergo: Why not asking a neighbouring friendly (to you) nation to interfere next time? There would be much less problems if the attacker would have been Saudi Arabia and not USA, whose dont share the same culture, ect. If they would have DOW-ed Iraq and later USA would have joined on their side saying 'defending an ally' it wouldn't bee THIS awfull as it is now. Most iraqians hate US troops simply because they arent arabian/muslim/ect. PS: In Somalia there was Ethiopia

That's right, those dirty little semites aren't cultured enough to participate in a democracy. Adding racism to your isolationist diatribe, now? Excellent, I'm so pleased I re-opened the topic. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I think he means cultural and legal differences what exist, no racism. An other example would be Japan, they had to change their ways to be similar to 'western' ones, but enough remained of their ancient culture what some people dislike, or find crazy, but noone can deny they are effecient, honourable and 'tech-gurus' because they have their culture, original laws, and traditions still influencing their lives all day and all time. Nations and their cultures in Africa and Middle East are greatly tied to the fact that they are islam, their ways are islam ,their laws are islam, and their methods are islam. While europeans seem to loose their roots to christianity because our nations were build on individuals and royal ties, the muslims can only be gratefull for their existence today because of their faith. We have our basics in nation, ruler, culture, and they have theirs in faith. (Of course i do not deny the fact europe wasn't infuenced by our own faith, but that had great impact the last time in the crusades and reconquista. And the chism in the Church -Calvin, Luther, ect.- only weakened the faith in God and faith as the First Law* meanwhile nobles and other worldy people gained more influence and power in matters formerly decided by clerics.) All these actions in those nations outside your 'influental sphere' only prepares a new war, waht could be WW3, but more possibly a new crusade/muslim 'convertion of heathens by sword'. While I would be one of the first to join a crusade to retake Constantinople (as example) I do not think we can only act with violence in this case, but that needs that USA and other Western/insert any non-muslim nation just don't interfere in things what are simply not their buisness.

:D

If you actually get it, and in one piece

Maybe his daughter?

Gamershell, it doesnt need stupid registration or such.

I believe that's a q, not a g. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Yes, it is a 'Q'. This is a 'road-adventure'. Putting Drakula un an other light than he is usually portraid in the western media. And he shouldn't look like your 'typical Bram' vampire, that would be kinda silly like that noone sees that Superman is Kent without glasses. (even as he has the 'bram costume' just for fun) And BTW: why do you await from a small hobby developer team who makes this in their free time? I think its interesting, and will wait till I play the game/see the movie for my final judgement.

Everyone spies on everyone, even Hungary has spies in the US, and many in better positions. (and noone would ever believe it anyway)

Enjoy the trailer: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fGxIJCT1TXc And here's the description: http://www.draqula.hu/draqula-eng.htm

I don't recall him asking for it. BTW: It isn't over, it just began.

I think all of us have their own thoughts about it, and this thread won't help in anything, except making more spam. Think about it, thread creator didn't even once comment since he did it.

oil*

And sometimes these threads just dont make ANY sense

that he feels like a man?

shrek 1-2 never show the best gags in its trailers

http://mfile.akamai.com/17690/wmv/paramoun...ailer_1_lrg.asx

use intrigue, emotions , influence, and connections between NPC-s/PC-s

1. nearly the same ith jewis buildings 2. exactly

If you 'take a walk' with her, then yes! '

<{POST_SNAPBACK}> I talked with a rabbi (or what) about this when i was in their 'main building' in Budapest, they say they have different onlooks on this, just like on cristianity, some ot them actually agree on jesus being God's child, but don't call themselves christians because the people burning and such in the medieval times, also there are those who openly use the swatiska as it was meant to be, and hope to archieve with this that the symbole becomes again what it should be. if i remeber correctly jews have 13-26 different 'branches', like christianity has catholicism, protestantism, anglicanism, ect.

I have seen that you're here, but you weren't writing/editing anything at that time.