WITHTEETH

ohh burn...

that poll was a big surprise (sarcastic)

Alliance isn;tthe dream of europe to unite as 1. and that the euro helps all to interrconnect more?

just to share information a starting teachers makes about 29 thousand a year which is less then half, but with full beneifts still and retirement.

my girlfriend is going to college for that, so i was just curious, thanks that helps.

How well do the people who work for the gov. get paid, for instance teachers?

how come you guys dont have euro's yet?

My background is scandinavian. norwegain, and danish

WOW, i get taxed 28% and and i make $30k and im 22 paying for my own college. WITH NO HEALTHCARE! The reason i have no healthcare through college is beacsue you have to atlest take 12 credits and i average on 8-11 only because i have to support myself.

how much do you averagely get taxed for making 90kr?

Rancor is no match for a jedi consular lever 1 sceptor. geez!

that was very interesting! but what about the person that isn't unionized, say he works at a painting or caprenter job, he wouldn't get paid the good money because hes not backed by the gov. so he gets paid whatever the boss decides like in a capitalist gov.?

what do you mean precisely by socialist program? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I mean a socialist gov. like the one you are from. i was under the influence that the average worker gets paid more, gets their actual cut, so the top doesn't get it all, so their can't be a bill gates or enron exec with a swiss bank account.

Yes i agree about the U.S. schools not being that great, i have a big opinion on this. i think it should be year-round, and shorter days and more small breaks in between. also pay the teachers more. also stop bogging the teachers down with tests and STOP THE MULTI CHOICE QUESTIONS! and free college. =less crime, less poverty, and the kids don't come back from summer break w/ no clue.

for question 1: i heard that people in scandinavia will make more on avreage in a socialist program, is this false? if it is true can you tell me how and why.

well that scares me to think that education is getting worse. since we control the earth to some extent, i wouldn't want it to be in the hands of idiots! how many years was it free in UK?

"Why is it the state's responsibility to take care of the needy? Why should it be the state's responsibility to organize health care and education? Why should the state provide the safety nets? Why should private acteurs not be trusted too much with these things? Because all a private corporation cares about is earning money. Profit. Profit. And profit. That is all that will matter, and the human beings in the system will be overlooked and pushed back. We will not be the priority. Liquid means will. The state has a better possibility of staying neutral in cases like this. Its institutions need to stay afloat and prosper financially, of course, but this will be provided by the taxpayers, who are investing money into their own safety. There will be no need to start saving up for your children's college money the moment they are born, because education is free. There's no need to fear calling the ambulance, because you know an ambulance ride and two nights at a hospital will cost you $3000. It will be free. There's no need to fear having an accident that will render you unable to work - the state will help you, as is its responsibility." Well written jellybelly. but i do have some questions for anybody who lives in a socialist gov, that i have been wondering about. 1: How can a regular factory worker make more, or does he make more just to balance out the cost of healthcare and other expenses, because its going to bew taxed anyway. 2: You say that your state pays for college, i just want to hear it again just to be sure you mean college. also is education in a socialist country trated different? 3: Your opinion(or someone elses) on if its fair to the man who starts his own small business since he is taking the risk, if its fair to have to share more of the wealth, with his employees. feel free to whomever answers these questions to ellaborate on them, im very curious. thank you

Bellbottoms i think your talking about, capris rise above the ankle.

nah more like swamp thing (w00t)

I might be late but... Most people relate to themselves more then anybody. therefore if people pick a character that resembles themself or someone they admire, then the game is more to them. I feel it when i watch a movie or listen to music or even read a book. if you can see yourself in that person easier then its easier to relate. For instance, my girlfriend hates blondes, she can't relate to them. and my sister is blonde and she doesn't care about brunnettes so neither of them are going to be willing to play eachother and enjoy it more. thats my hypothesis. any comments?

I agree w/ you ,its not neccessarily a bad thing.

Thats to bad man. Hopefully this patch comes out soon. thats also to bad when ive been saying that for nearly 2 months.

Hm... as expected! But what could be the problem? Any ideas? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Maybe someone put you on a restriction so you can't watch porn anymore

communism is not suppose to be spontanous, theres steps, people never reallly jump into anything, always increments. just like platos cave. the man was dragged out, the matrix was mostly unrealistic when he took the pill willingly. first capitalism, then industrialization, then socialism then communism. the reason why the communist nations have failed is becasue it hasn't started like it should yet. it needs to start witht the working class rising above politically, which is possible in socialism. and not grabbing their guns to do so. Im just thinking, how could we know if its not possible? the system could always be tweaked and Marks and Engals really didn't set up a strict system, he left room to work w/. Of course the "real world" "communism" didn't work, its was your standard dictatorship who oppressed it people. and anytime you need to protect youir own regime from the people you govern, its doomed to have trouble. Its sad that lenin got away with starving 2Million to industrialize his country for "a Means to an end" how scarey.

I don;t think anyone here thinks that the USSR version of "communism" was a healthy way to live. its generally universal how people feel about it. but we have been defending socialism. By the way, what do you think the USSR at the beggining stages of Communism was? socialist dictator, capitalist perhaps? feel free to express your opinion and make a constructive argument my ears are open. i can't seem to place my thumb on it. im thinking whle lenin was still around that it was a socialist dictator with bits of capitalism and military.