I doubt one poses as a pseudo-intellectual (the direct and conscious action, I mean, of course), since pseudo-intellectualism is per its very nature about concealment, shrouding the concealer's essence, his raison(s) d'etre, his texture (unless, of course, one attempts to subvert and satirize) and heaving up a facade in its place (and thus feigning knowledgeableness, intellectual vigor, etc.) (insecurities away!).
It would be less erroneous, I think, to accuse me of feigning insight.
And of pomposity.