Meshugger

Because it's the norm there and not here, what's so difficult to understand?

Does this invaluable pearl of wisdom also apply to women? Just as no man can have female friends, no woman can have male friends. The sooner we accept this fact, the better people will get along. Reasoning? Sexual dimorphism manifested through masculinity and femininity, which leads to friendship between sexes impossible to be at the same level as within. ...Because...? Because it's different.

Does this invaluable pearl of wisdom also apply to women? Just as no man can have female friends, no woman can have male friends. The sooner we accept this fact, the better people will get along. Reasoning? Sexual dimorphism manifested through masculinity and femininity, which leads to friendship between sexes impossible to be at the same level as within.

Does this invaluable pearl of wisdom also apply to women? Just as no man can have female friends, no woman can have male friends. The sooner we accept this fact, the better people will get along.

There is no such thing as female friends. If you think otherwise, it just means that you haven't had any real friends to begin with.

They are bad at politics because they are just not another political party or entity, it's because they are men on a mission.

There was only one polling station for 21000 people in Arizona http://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/03/22/live-arizona-primary-coverage-presidential-preference-election/82096726/ lol

*sigh* http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3505610/Brussels-airport-suicide-bombers-Belgian-brothers-accomplice-white-remains-run.html#ixzz43lL0I6a8 Well, i do not trust the Turks, so why should this info bear any merit. But there it is anyway.

Yes I understand your concern, I may not share your view about them being all being dangerous but seriously ....WTF are people from those countries doing immigrating to Finland? Its more the principle for me because I understand the shared burden of the EU but I still think its unfair to expect countries like Finland to just accept these refugees and have no concerns It should be optional but as I keep saying the ME countries must take more refugees before Europe has to At least about 2/3 of all those refugees will have their status revoked and returned home, the problem is that the authorities are hoping that they will leave on their own behalf. So you have potentially 20000 men going underground going somewhere, doing something, but no one will know what.

Errr, the Syrian refugees Finland weren't even 3% of the total number of refugees. This is the list of the top 6. Iraq: 20485 Afghanistan: 5214 Somalia: 1981 Syria: 877 Albania: 762 (what?) Iran: 619 A total of 32 476, where over 70% where men in fighting age.

Vintage Mesh: "The problem with speech inciting genocide and racial hatred is that we don't have enough of it in the mainstream media! The solution is simple: we should give Nazis a voice! They've been oppressed for too long, I say!" ...and you didn't even watch video. Not once does he preach for genocide. Neither did I claim he did? I was just being anal about it, no worries.

There very well may be some truth to this. Voter fraud is nothing new. Certain places like Chicago are notorious for it, and there's a number of good documentaries out there on it in regards to national elections (none that I can link on youtube though). Some focus on the 2000 election in Florida, some focus on 2004 in Ohio, and some just talk about it in general. 'Hacking Democracy' is probably the best one overall in my opinion. I highly recommend everyone find it and watch it if you haven't already. On top of voter fraud there is the shady and very undemocratic at times primary process of both parties. The Dem's system currently seems more blatantly corrupt, but the Republican's certainly is as well. Just ask Ron Paul supporters from the last election, or do a little research. You'll find that party nominations have been stolen in the past (most recently and fairly obviously by Eisenhower), it's nothing new. The reason i asked was because there has been hearings in locally about it before: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t4aKOhbbK9E //edit: More about the vulnurabilities in the voting system https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ybCaT52Fa6w

Vintage Mesh: "The problem with speech inciting genocide and racial hatred is that we don't have enough of it in the mainstream media! The solution is simple: we should give Nazis a voice! They've been oppressed for too long, I say!" Free speech, you use it, you defend it, end of story. You should not pick winners, like they seem to do at Harvard. ...and you didn't even watch video. Not once does he preach for genocide. //edit2, bah i should've just posted this video instead and left it at that: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=icqPHsNumuU

It's not like you can verify the falseness of that hypothesis, however. Shootings and bombings weren't a particularly favored pastime before the recession hit, AFAIK. Either it is true for all unemployed, downtrodden youth in all of Europe and we would see Greeks and Spaniards blowing **** up (http://www.statista.com/statistics/266228/youth-unemployment-rate-in-eu-countries/), which hasn't exactly happened, or we have to accept that the underlying problem is something more within the community itself instead. This is where the article fails, it just scratches the surface.

The issue is not about some guys expressing the opinion of wishing to murder a whole group of people. The issue is that, thanks to identity politics, such things are ok to be debated on certain groups and not on others; which in turn will sow the seeds to war. For example, when are these opinions going to be invited and debated freely and given a voice in mainstream media? Free speech or death, i say.

That article comos off as more patronizing than what it wishes to be. If a culture or a group of people start to blow up airports and subways, do mass shootings and suicide bomb themselves sporadically because they are simply bored, too stupid, depressed, have high unemployment and think it is cool, then why even bother allow them to Europe to begin with if they are so fragile? *cough* scope insensitivity *cough* Estimated number of Muslims in Belgium: 320.000-450.000 Estimated number of young European Muslims who have traveled to Syria to fight alongside ISIS: 470. "A culture starts to blow up airports and subways", my ass. But that's what the article is saying and i took it to it's logical conclusion. Thus highlighting that something is greatly amiss in its reasoning. If an article states that 0,1% of a culture does something, stating that the entire culture is to be blamed for their actions isn't "taking the article to its logical conclusion", it's engaging in reductio ad absurdum. If I'm being nice. No. The article is trying to explain reasoning behind the actions of these men by asserting the same problems found among the youth across Europe, but for some strange reason people from Molenbeek express the same failures by shooting and bombing, all while being shielded by the locals against the authorities. It's trivilizes the problem, to downright patronizing, as something that will solve itself if there just were enough jobs.

I've been to Arizona. It's incredibly beautiful state with the Grand Canyon, Joshua trees and its open vistas (the indian territories were quite depressing though). Little did i know about their primary system, so maybe it's sometimes good to be ignorant about certain things, depending on how you see it.

KP, any comments?

Criminal behavior and extreme violence are much more common within those people that are secede from general population than in general population, regardless of their origin. Like how our school shooters and that man/boy that exploded himself in mall were all pure breed Finns that all had seceded from general population and found people with similar mind from internet that feed their feelings of separation to point where they committed their acts of mass murder. And we have those pseudo nazis that commit petty crimes and violence and some case murders, we have our motor cycle gangs, we had our extreme leftist groups that idolized non-existent communism to point where they were willing to do heavy crimes, we have our very miss guided nature protectors that are willing to go extreme measures to stop/prevent things that they see to be against their world view and so on. Of course every society have their own Morlocks causing trouble in their own way and they are handled accordingly. But adding more Morlocks from other places and effectively having no preventive measures for this new kind of Morlock behaviour will not help one bit and as in worst cases, what the host nation consider as Morlock behaviour is a-ok or understandable by the imported Eloi. But in this case problem isn't in imported Eloi, but that some children or children's children of said imported Eloi become Morlocks. So like I said reason why these Morlocks pop-up isn't necessary in fact that we let their Eloi parents in the society, but how our society's systems have failed to make them Eloi. Almost agreed, but our Eloi seems to fail to grasp that you cannot blame us for all the problems they cause and make their Morlocks victims of society. Our Eloi should have and should've had the foresight on what potential problems this experiment would cause.

Criminal behavior and extreme violence are much more common within those people that are secede from general population than in general population, regardless of their origin. Like how our school shooters and that man/boy that exploded himself in mall were all pure breed Finns that all had seceded from general population and found people with similar mind from internet that feed their feelings of separation to point where they committed their acts of mass murder. And we have those pseudo nazis that commit petty crimes and violence and some case murders, we have our motor cycle gangs, we had our extreme leftist groups that idolized non-existent communism to point where they were willing to do heavy crimes, we have our very miss guided nature protectors that are willing to go extreme measures to stop/prevent things that they see to be against their world view and so on. Of course every society have their own Morlocks causing trouble in their own way and they are handled accordingly. But adding more Morlocks from other places and effectively having no preventive measures for this new kind of Morlock behaviour will not help one bit and as in worst cases, what the host nation consider as Morlock behaviour is a-ok or understandable by the imported Eloi.

Article uses assumption that this attackers are European born and grown. Which means that nobody allowed them in Europe in first place. "European" as second or third generation North Africans and Middle Easterners. The result of an ongoing policy since the end of WWII. You can't come to Europe because your children or your children's children may grow to become terrorists because of things that have happened yet. Sounds reasonable policy, too bad that our politicians didn't understood need for such caution decades ago. The article being dumb aside, creating a policy where middle eastern and north african muslims become ghettofied over the generations and not part of society is the reason why we are here we are. I see little reason to continue with the same. It isn't good policy to let any population group secede from general population. But I see fault to be more in housing, schooling, and employment policies than in immigration policies of past. But of course if we can't make our domestic policies work then adding more stress to system that don't work isn't solid policy either. BruceVC: I am sorry that I have failed in my attempt of sarcasm. I tried my best to make it so over the top that nobody would take it serious. I would buy the first half of your argument if all human behaviour in different groups manifested itself similarly for all, but it doesn't.

I am amazed how women have survived through the generations when there's these kinds of problems. It's a good thing we have invented them now so that we can finally solve them.

Article uses assumption that this attackers are European born and grown. Which means that nobody allowed them in Europe in first place. "European" as second or third generation North Africans and Middle Easterners. The result of an ongoing policy since the end of WWII. You can't come to Europe because your children or your children's children may grow to become terrorists because of things that have happened yet. Sounds reasonable policy, too bad that our politicians didn't understood need for such caution decades ago. The article being dumb aside, creating a policy where middle eastern and north african muslims become ghettofied over the generations and not part of society is the reason why we are here we are. I see little reason to continue with the same.

That article comos off as more patronizing than what it wishes to be. If a culture or a group of people start to blow up airports and subways, do mass shootings and suicide bomb themselves sporadically because they are simply bored, too stupid, depressed, have high unemployment and think it is cool, then why even bother allow them to Europe to begin with if they are so fragile? But that would require responsibility for failure in policy, of which Drowsy already pointed out that the current establishment will not do. Rather race further down the cliff than admitting that you're wrong, i guess. Article uses assumption that this attackers are European born and grown. Which means that nobody allowed them in Europe in first place. "European" as second or third generation North Africans and Middle Easterners. The result of an ongoing policy since the end of WWII.