Meshugger

Sorry for using your post as an example, but see what happens when you shroud a few excerpts taken out of context in social reality? Pretty nasty, huh? Not at all. You are perfectly welcome to shield yourself and dismiss others as you wish. The truth is that the guy has suspicious contacts, mentioned by personal name in the Podesta-leaks (Austyn Crites), and it is already been established that the DNC hire professional agent provocateurs thanks to the Project Veritas investigations, where they admitted to the Chicago and Arizona riots. Meshugger please stop arguing for the sake of arguing, you know Indira is right Whoa, settle down there. You're out-nazing the Nazis with all your telling what people should say or not. Sorry for using your post as an example, but see what happens when you shroud a few excerpts taken out of context in social reality? Pretty nasty, huh? Not at all. You are perfectly welcome to shield yourself and dismiss others as you wish. The truth is that the guy has suspicious contacts, mentioned by personal name in the Podesta-leaks (Austyn Crites), and it is already been established that the DNC hire professional agent provocateurs thanks to the Project Veritas investigations, where they admitted to the Chicago and Arizona riots. No need for shielding (from what?), as I'm obviously just as subjective as you are, and I'm certainly not dismissing you, but rather what you delineate with such absolute certainty, when it's just a matter of leaning on a termite-infested pole. Transforming a textual game of Chinese whispers into "the truth", the "established", and other claims without any other scientifically stringent or reliable sources than bits of text strings garnered over the internet grapevine is quite a feat, but it has nothing to do with reality. It's just as real as those talking heads you see in documentaries, it's just blah, blah, blah. It seems barbaric in nature, the post-Nietzschean 21st century kind. Oh, by the way, did you know that the etymology of that word "barbaric" is blah, blah, or "bar bar", in ancient Greek? My point is a serious one, though. We should all be much more careful in our usage of internet sources, and that goes for all the wikis out there. And, please, keep on rallying for your sociopolitical views, but why mask them and present them as established truths, when they're just opinions and wishes? Stand up for your beliefs, no need for filters or smoke screens. Just go get 'em, champ! You're losing me because it almost reads like a stream-of-consciousness-line from Ulysses. I thank you for caring about my internet investigate rigor though. You have a link for that? Doesn't seem to be anything wrong with that if true. Certainly isn't like cops pretending to be rioters. List of mentions: https://search.wikileaks.org/?query=austyn+crites&exact_phrase=&any_of=&exclude_words=&document_date_start=&document_date_end=&released_date_start=&released_date_end=&new_search=True&order_by=most_relevant#results Click on the result called "RE: Additional Order" for the excel-file. Link to video about sabotage, bird-dogging and arranging the riots at Trump-rallies: https://search.wikileaks.org/?query=austyn+crites&exact_phrase=&any_of=&exclude_words=&document_date_start=&document_date_end=&released_date_start=&released_date_end=&new_search=True&order_by=most_relevant#results Click on the result called "RE: Additional Order" for the excel-file.

Sorry for using your post as an example, but see what happens when you shroud a few excerpts taken out of context in social reality? Pretty nasty, huh? Not at all. You are perfectly welcome to shield yourself and dismiss others as you wish. The truth is that the guy has suspicious contacts, mentioned by personal name in the Podesta-leaks (Austyn Crites), and it is already been established that the DNC hire professional agent provocateurs thanks to the Project Veritas investigations, where they admitted to the Chicago and Arizona riots.

Aaaah, the fear of the press as their deceased corrupt temple is about to fall on their heads. It's a wonder to behold.

Thanks again to Wikileaks (he was mentioned at least 7 times in the Podesta-leak as an affiliate for "Global Intelligence Files"), it is shown that the guy who was thrown out of the Trump-rally was an agent provocateur to do some birddogging.

Panic intensifies as he he realizes no control of the narrative. Or should i say, "triggered". Suffice to say that Wikileaks release what is leaked to them and they have said since the very beginning that they are against current world order of power between governments, the military-industrial complex and the media that parades it. What a bunch of meanies.

Wikileaks doesn't have agents. It just acts as a dead/ drop box for other people's info. Which may or may not have been obtained illegally. That's the problem for the US, much as they'd love to go after WL overtly they cannot since they definitely don't do any hacking or similar directly illegal stuff; they just distribute information that is leaked to them. eg Manning didn't illegally obtain the info he gave to wikileaks, he illegally distributed information he had legitimate access too- similarly Snowden (albeit not WL related) didn't hack the NSA, he had legit access to information he then distributed. If Mark Rich gave WL the DNC leaks- as Assange has repeatedly hinted at- then it wasn't hacked either, since he had legit access to it. The only election relevant stuff that was likely hacked is the Podesta emails where he fairly clearly got phished. Yep, and that's the crux of the matter. They're real documents and emails, and there's never been a serious effort to discredit WL information as being false or altered, all the effort has gone into obfuscation rather than denial. If they were false that would be the defence, and it would be a complete one that would discredit WL far more than any amount of neo Red Scare McCarthyism and claims of bias could. Gee what a surprise, Zora defending Wikileaks. As usual you present a subjective and biased view of the reality of political developments around the world. For example you say things like " It just acts as a dead/ drop box for other people's info" and " they just distribute information that is leaked to them " , someone who believed you and had no knowledge of Wikileaks would think " so its just a benevolent organisation that just seeks to share information with the global information , whats wrong with that " Nothing would be wrong with that if that is what Wikileaks does....but they absolutely dont do that. They selectively target the Democrats and have ensured they release certain emails strategically to achieve the maximum disruption to the US election..nothing negative about Trump ...nothing So please stop suggesting Wikileaks is about " distributing information that is leaked to them ". They have a political agenda and only release information that aligns to that agenda That is the crux of matter It's afraid.

Interesting video: https://twitter.com/VivaLaFreedom/status/795004230880870401 What does Hillary mean there?

Once again, reality is more fun than the internet: Ozzy should rewrite his old hit to accomodate Hillary: http://edition.cnn.com/US/9606/22/hillary.book/

Urrr, what agreement are they talking about here? (read from the bottom up) https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/47397 I read it like that there was an agreement between the Sanders and Hillary for him not to attack her on certain issues but he went rogue.

I have to give it Johnsson this time, the guy can make you laugh.

Subtly implying that Hillary supporters are alone and victims of violence. The comic needs more work.

lol, electrical voting. What a dumb idea.

Ah, the #NeverTrump-ers are at it again. I am sure that aspie 40 year old unmarried mormon with a lemonhead is a good investment by the neocons. William Kristal must be proud.

This keeps in getting eerie. What the hell are they talking about? https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/30613

The insanity is any sane person giving her credence, let alone people in the political glitterati.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/15893 http://www.editionjs.com/img/abramovic/ So let me get this straigth. Hillary's campaign manager engages in "spirit cooking", meaning breast milk, sperm and blood. Wow.

Since the are rumors floating around (mostly from the truepundit-site) that part of Clinton machine and the DoJ are involved in traficking and child prostitution, it caused the autistic anons to dig like never before. Resulting in the quite hilarious self-revelation: //edit: Is it this perhaps? https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/10052

Human psychology in action. No one wants to be around the loser and everyone naturally flocks around the winner. Ha, that sounds like something I'd write. Of course as entertaining as that would it's not going to happen. Just like Sanders had no chance of being the Democrat nominee Trump has no chance of being the President. In other news, for the 5 hipsters who care about his opinion Žižek has said he'd vote for Trump. Watching his fanbase try to rationalize that is pretty funny. You know that the left has gone awry when Zizek is starting to support Trump.

What https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/45131

Don't worry, we will finally know the extent of her medical condition when she has to use it in order to avoid going to jail.

A nice, long, and informative article describing populism in the past and in the current day, written by someone not being a Trump supporter: http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/11/02/the-populist-explosion-new-book-explains-rise-of-trump-sanders-and-the-populist-future/

The lines have been drawn in the sand and all that, but for once in a long time someone from outside the political machinery has a chance to claim the presidency, and even challenging the current paradigm of globalism to boot. So why not?

Well or is at least notable. The idea that there are scumbags out there is pretty obvious. And not as if there is some narrative here that this is fighting against, as well. Relax, I was just messing with you.

Everyone, lets only post if it changes anything.

Are you insinuating that a bunch of **** have once again foiled the plan a utopia of mother Gaia? Well, i never!