data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0be1f/0be1f589aac193c98a47387b94c888ffd82a49f0" alt=""
DreamWayfarer
Members-
Posts
655 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
DreamWayfarer last won the day on February 17 2016
DreamWayfarer had the most liked content!
Reputation
275 ExcellentAbout DreamWayfarer
-
Rank
(6) Magician
-
Tabletop RPG adaptation
DreamWayfarer replied to hamskii's topic in Pillars of Eternity: General Discussion (NO SPOILERS)
Maybe it would work better if instead of x attacks per turn there were action points, DEX gave more action points per turn and interrupts subtracted action points from the target's next turn action point pool.- 18 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- pillars of eternity
- tabletop
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
I think you may be talking about me . And I agree that Chanters fit a Watcher as much as ciphers, because their unique type of necromancy and tradition of remembering the past mean that a chanter would be the first to embrace the gift of being a Watcher. Not only that, but both Watchers and Chanters are much closer to the original meaning of the term "Necromancer" than what you usually see on fantasy, being bridges between the living and the dead, the present and the past. It is only natural to have both in one character. EDIT: not really my favorite class however. I don't love extreme micromanagement, but chanters take it too far in the other direction before late-game.
-
I would say that for a melee wizard who focuses on damage with conjured weapons DEX is slightly more important, even if so little it is more of a matter of tastes, as weapon accuracy is straighforward enough to buff to the point of few misses and critting is not a Wizard's main strenght, while attacking, casting and chaining buffs faster can be helpful (and even if buffs are all fast, sometimes you just need to empty your grimmorie at once to survive. For a tank Wizard however, PER is the only way.