Why do wands need hands at all? Why can't a character duct tape 200 of them onto him and shoot them all at the same time? Pew fuggen pew.

 

Whatever made up answer there is for that, it's probably the same as for why no dual wielding them. You need to channel the magic with a force of will or whatever, you can't do that with 2 at once because does your mind even lift bro.

I want my Aumaua wizard to have six wands set to rotate mounted on a Dwarf with a backpack who acts as a tripod. Where are my fully automatic gatling wands???

Bandoliers. You wear one that holds six pistols. You shoot them in rapid succession, boom boom boom boom boom boom, but can't reload and will have to switch to a melee weapon after you're done.

 

A single one-handed pistol couldn't be reloaded; instead, once you've let off the shot, you use it off-hand as a club. Perhaps not very effective, but badass. Definitely badass.

 

Preach it.

 

Bandoliers. You wear one that holds six pistols. You shoot them in rapid succession, boom boom boom boom boom boom, but can't reload and will have to switch to a melee weapon after you're done.

 

A single one-handed pistol couldn't be reloaded; instead, once you've let off the shot, you use it off-hand as a club. Perhaps not very effective, but badass. Definitely badass.

 

Preach it.

 

 

Because what if you equip a wand in one hand and a dagger in the offhand? They'd have to code a whole new behavior system for mixing melee and ranged weapons.

 

I would have just made the wands float then, like shooting swords.

 

Attack from shoulder float 1.

Balance reasons.

This would be more credible if single wands weren't already pretty bad.

I need two hands to handle my wand, though I tend to prefer referring to it as a staff...

 

I'll get my coat.

Since I got my married I no longer need to handle my wand  staff, my wife takes care of that.....