Blarghagh Posted April 17, 2010 Posted April 17, 2010 Cool. Socialist party in Holland just seems to be losing ground. (What? Just 'cause I think lord of flies is a jackass doesn't mean I hate all socialists. I vote socialist party most of the time.)
Gorgon Posted April 17, 2010 Posted April 17, 2010 She is pretty hot Na na na na na na ... greg358 from Darksouls 3 PVP is a CHEATER. That is all.
Humodour Posted April 17, 2010 Posted April 17, 2010 (edited) Just need to smoke some jays aaaay Edited April 17, 2010 by Krezack
Rostere Posted April 17, 2010 Posted April 17, 2010 She seems to be a nice girl, although at least I would be reluctant to vote for a party who has never held power. Although in a way, that really highlights an inherent problem with the American way of democratic representation. "Well, overkill is my middle name. And my last name. And all of my other names as well!"
lord of flies Posted April 17, 2010 Author Posted April 17, 2010 She seems to be a nice girl, although at least I would be reluctant to vote for a party who has never held power. Although in a way, that really highlights an inherent problem with the American way of democratic representation.Yes, and that is why (I think) the PSL focuses on elections where it can be more competitive, so that it can eventually succeed and show that it is capable of holding power.But, really, it's no use discussing politics with you or Mr. Flies - you're two sides of the same coin.Yeah. I'm the right side, and he's the wrong side.
Hurlshort Posted April 17, 2010 Posted April 17, 2010 There are actually benefits to running for election even in a lost cause. I'm no expert on them, but I believe that when you reach a certain percentage of the vote you gain benefits in future elections. I remember that was the big reason Ralph Nader always ran, it allowed his party to take part in other political events if he garnered like 5% of the vote.
Humodour Posted April 18, 2010 Posted April 18, 2010 There are actually benefits to running for election even in a lost cause. I'm no expert on them, but I believe that when you reach a certain percentage of the vote you gain benefits in future elections. I remember that was the big reason Ralph Nader always ran, it allowed his party to take part in other political events if he garnered like 5% of the vote. That's true. Or at least it is in an election where you only need quota (not majority) to win. I don't know if that little observation would hold in America's voting system.
Humodour Posted April 18, 2010 Posted April 18, 2010 Not hot. Oh come on, worth a poke if your telly's broke, yeah?
Guest The Architect Posted April 18, 2010 Posted April 18, 2010 Not hot. Oh come on, worth a poke if your telly's broke, yeah? Not hot =! wouldn't poke, buddy.
Oblarg Posted April 18, 2010 Posted April 18, 2010 (edited) Where the hell have you been LoF? Have you not realized that I oppose socialism? That's a really dumb blanket statement, especially because I've yet to hear you give a coherent definition of socialism. Hint: It's not simply "redistribution of wealth." Edited April 18, 2010 by Oblarg "The universe is a yawning chasm, filled with emptiness and the puerile meanderings of sentience..." - Ulyaoth "It is all that is left unsaid upon which tragedies are built." - Kreia "I thought this forum was for Speculation & Discussion, not Speculation & Calling People Trolls." - lord of flies
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now