"Considering the jews were a minority and built their numbers through illegal immigration..."

 

'Illegal immigration'. LOLZ Did Palestine ever have a modern style immigration law? And, oh btw, tell that to the US anda few decades when illegal immigrants will magically become 'legal' and have some control (if they don't already).

 

" They were less than a third of the population of the land when they were given control of it. And no arguments about it being their homeland as it hadn't been their country for about 3000 years."

 

I love thisa rgument. With thatab rgument, if Isreal can keep control of the land for, say, 1000 years, you are then suggesting that the palestinians will no longer have a legit claim and they then should shut up. What a weak argument.

 

Hey, judge, yeah, I stole that guy's car but it was 10 years ago. He should just get over it. HAHA! That's the same lame argument the child molestor supporters use as well. L0LZ

 

Soemthing doesn't become 'right' simply due to the passage of time. If taht were the case, both the Kanadian and Amerikan governemtns should destroy treaties with the Native populations because it was so a few centuries ago. LMAO

 

Illegal immigration under the laws of the British mandate for Palestine.

 

Thats generally how it works. Squatters rights, statute of limitations, etc. Doesn't make it right, just accepted. Also, Jews conquered the land from the Canaanites and such, so under your logic and mine its not their land.

 

The population numbers are vastly different now, the jews are the vast majority now with mass migration of European jews and such so the point is moot, but the Palestinians still got screwed.

Edited April 18, 201015 yr by Oerwinde

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finnish_Waffen_SS_volunteers

 

From your link: "Moreover, the unit or its members were never accused of any war crimes."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finnish_Waffen_SS_volunteers

 

From your link: "Moreover, the unit or its members were never accused of any war crimes."

Unit 731 got a full pardon from the USA.

If you could provide something to back up your views other than "you're wrong because I say so," it'd be more convincing. Not that LoF argues flawlessly, either, but you're really not making a strong point.

See, I have already done that in countless other threads -- he simply repeats himself time and time again, hoping the opposition will go away. Analysing and defeating his rhetoric in detail is a pretty sterile effort, even when there is something to analyse and it's not just tripe along the lines of "democracy is only good when you can only vote for the CPSU". Use the search function, if you don't believe me.

You must enjoy fictitious arguments, because I've never argued that "democracy is only good when you can only vote for the CPSU".

 

 

I believe you DID say that all non-communist parties were reactionary. Moreover it cannot be enough to simply SAY you are communist. No doubt there will be committees of shiny-faced apparatchiks who will determine whether parties are true communists or not. I'm sure that won't cause any problems for free speech or democracy.

He made a girl cry

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cNQSV3BBtZ4

 

Manis Friedman

"doesn't believe in Western morality." So the Chabad rabbi from Minnesota stated in these pages last issue. "The only way to fight a moral war is the Jewish way: Destroy their holy sites. Kill men, women and children (and cattle)." Friedman was answering the question, "How should Jews treat their Arab neighbors?" Or rather, as he clarified afterward, he was describing how he believes Jews should behave when they find themselves at war with Arabs. His answer was that they should fight brutally, without regard for civilian lives, indeed genocidally.

 

Yes, the Palestinians Are to Blame.

Ok so you have found a video of a weird jewish professor. What does that have to do with anything.

 

Arguments generally work better when there is some semblance of context.

I don