Jump to content

What is your position on the ANSWER Coalition?


lord of flies

Recommended Posts

I ask because there was a forum that I used to browse back when I was just a moderate left-winger (like a liberal), and just recently I decided to look up ANSWER on that forum (because I'm joining the PSL, which is a member and one of the main organizers of ANSWER). And while most of the posts were in 2003, there were a few from 2005, and they were mostly virulently anti-ANSWER. Basically on moralistic white-man's-burden grounds. I'd appreciate it if you explained whether or not you were aware of ANSWER.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have never heard of it.

 

I am partial to a bit of the old white man's (democratic) burden, however. :bat:

"It wasn't lies. It was just... bull****"."

             -Elwood Blues

 

tarna's dead; processing... complete. Disappointed by Universe. RIP Hades/Sand/etc. Here's hoping your next alt has a harp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never heard of it.

"Some men see things as they are and say why?"
"I dream things that never were and say why not?"
- George Bernard Shaw

"Hope in reality is the worst of all evils because it prolongs the torments of man."
- Friedrich Nietzsche

 

"The amount of energy necessary to refute bull**** is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it."

- Some guy 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Take up the White Man's burden--

The savage wars of peace--

Fill full the mouth of Famine

And bid the sickness cease;

And when your goal is nearest

The end for others sought,

Watch sloth and heathen Folly

Bring all your hopes to nought."

 

lebanon_attack_un_0625.jpg

 

Although I don't for one moment consider this really a white man thing.

 

 

_45141227_-23.jpg

"It wasn't lies. It was just... bull****"."

             -Elwood Blues

 

tarna's dead; processing... complete. Disappointed by Universe. RIP Hades/Sand/etc. Here's hoping your next alt has a harp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am partial to a bit of the old white man's (democratic) burden, however. :bat:
White man's burden is, always has been, and always will be, a naked justification for imperialism.

 

Czechoslovakia 1968... Afghanistan 1979... Soviet involvement in the Spanish civil war...

"It wasn't lies. It was just... bull****"."

             -Elwood Blues

 

tarna's dead; processing... complete. Disappointed by Universe. RIP Hades/Sand/etc. Here's hoping your next alt has a harp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Czechoslovakia 1968... Afghanistan 1979... Soviet involvement in the Spanish civil war...
Defending progressive revolutionaries is different from imperialism.

 

Oh, I see. So the socialist's burden is different? Thanks for clearing that up.

 

This reminds me of a Polish joke I heard recently. A Pawel is a small boy in class, and he is given the assignment of writing an essay entitled 'The benefits of living with our Communist friends' (meaning the Russians). When it is marked the teacher says "Your essay was good, but you got the title wrong. It should have been 'friends', not 'brothers'." To which Pawel replies "No I changed it on purpose. You get to choose your friends, but you don't choose family."

"It wasn't lies. It was just... bull****"."

             -Elwood Blues

 

tarna's dead; processing... complete. Disappointed by Universe. RIP Hades/Sand/etc. Here's hoping your next alt has a harp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope, never heard of it.

 

Also I don't give a rat's arse about the "white man's burden." In my ever so humble opinion it is a load of bull. If a nation can't stand on its own they deserve to be taken over. If a nation can successfully remove the yoke of tyranny then they deserve to be free. I don't see that as an issue of being white, black, or anything in between. That is just how the human race is like. It has been that way for thousands of years and will continue to be that way for thousands of years to come.

"Your Job is not to die for your country, but set a man on fire, and take great comfort in the general hostility and unfairness of the universe."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While we may think that Democracy is preferable to totalitarianism, and with good reason, that doesn't give us the right to decide when to fight for it, and how many casualties are acceptable.

 

I like how LoF can't wipe his own arse without first formulating the consequences according to Marxist theory.

Na na  na na  na na  ...

greg358 from Darksouls 3 PVP is a CHEATER.

That is all.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also I don't give a rat's arse about the "white man's burden." In my ever so humble opinion it is a load of bull. If a nation can't stand on its own they deserve to be taken over. If a nation can successfully remove the yoke of tyranny then they deserve to be free.

 

I'm quite interested by this. So you're saying that military success is predicated entirely on the abstract virtue of the nation? Or is it more subtle?

 

EDIT: On the other hand I agree that to a certain extent we have to accept that politics are deermined by tooth and claw. As 11xhooah said: "Freedom, peace, and security are not crapped out of a rainbow."

Edited by Walsingham

"It wasn't lies. It was just... bull****"."

             -Elwood Blues

 

tarna's dead; processing... complete. Disappointed by Universe. RIP Hades/Sand/etc. Here's hoping your next alt has a harp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never heard of it.

In 7th grade, I teach the students how Chuck Norris took down the Roman Empire, so it is good that you are starting early on this curriculum.

 

R.I.P. KOTOR 2003-2008 KILLED BY THOSE GREEDY MONEY-HOARDING ************* AND THEIR *****-*** MMOS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...