Humodour Posted April 18, 2007 Share Posted April 18, 2007 I think I'll have the Imperial March at my wedding when she's coming down the isle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tale Posted April 18, 2007 Share Posted April 18, 2007 I think I'll have the Imperial March at my wedding when she's coming down the isle. She can wear a Stormtrooper outfit. That's white. "Show me a man who "plays fair" and I'll show you a very talented cheater." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kumquatq3 Posted April 18, 2007 Share Posted April 18, 2007 (edited) I cannot see how a new game can diminish an existing one. We were talking about the franchise, not past games individually. I tried to make the distinction, maybe I failed to make it clear. I hope it makes sense in hindsight. I am questioning your assessment ... who gets to say whether a Fallout sequel is inferior? "I want all games to be good according to MY subjective wishes. Every developer must let me decide whether they can publish it or not." The argument made the assumption that the FO3 was a "bad FO". Since that assumption was made, "I rather have no FO than a bad FO" works. Also, it doesn't matter if you look at it from a "who gets to decide" viewpoint. The argument is one of personal opinion. Whatever your opinion is, you rather have no FO than what you precieve to be a bad FO. Edited April 18, 2007 by kumquatq3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sand Posted April 18, 2007 Share Posted April 18, 2007 (edited) I think that given the style in which Bethesda has shown in their past in house games is a good indicator on how Fallout 3 will be made, and if that is the case then it will be a bad Fallout. Edited April 18, 2007 by Sand Murphy's Law of Computer Gaming: The listed minimum specifications written on the box by the publisher are not the minimum specifications of the game set by the developer. @\NightandtheShape/@ - "Because you're a bizzare strange deranged human?" Walsingham- "Sand - always rushing around, stirring up apathy." Joseph Bulock - "Another headache, courtesy of Sand" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hell Kitty Posted April 18, 2007 Share Posted April 18, 2007 No Sand is better than bad Sand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pidesco Posted April 18, 2007 Share Posted April 18, 2007 bad Sand. Tautology? "My hovercraft is full of eels!" - Hungarian touristI am Dan Quayle of the Romans.I want to tattoo a map of the Netherlands on my nether lands.Heja Sverige!!Everyone should cuffawkle more.The wrench is your friend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fenghuang Posted April 18, 2007 Share Posted April 18, 2007 No Sand is better than bad Sand. But for bad Sand to exist there would have to also be good Sand. Thus I posit there is only Sand. RIP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sand Posted April 18, 2007 Share Posted April 18, 2007 There is no spoon, only Sand. Murphy's Law of Computer Gaming: The listed minimum specifications written on the box by the publisher are not the minimum specifications of the game set by the developer. @\NightandtheShape/@ - "Because you're a bizzare strange deranged human?" Walsingham- "Sand - always rushing around, stirring up apathy." Joseph Bulock - "Another headache, courtesy of Sand" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoM_Solaufein Posted April 18, 2007 Share Posted April 18, 2007 There is only lock down since someone threw sand into the well oiled machine and caused it to break down. War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery, Ignorance is StrengthBaldur's Gate moddingTeamBGBaldur's Gate modder/community leaderBaldur's Gate - Enhanced Edition beta testerBaldur's Gate 2 - Enhanced Edition beta tester Icewind Dale - Enhanced Edition beta tester Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts