@\NightandtheShape/@ Posted April 7, 2007 Share Posted April 7, 2007 Meta... I know all this. "I'm a programmer at a games company... REET GOOD!" - Me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metadigital Posted April 7, 2007 Share Posted April 7, 2007 I wasn't implying that you didn't ... I was trying to expand for the other readers. OBSCVRVM PER OBSCVRIVS ET IGNOTVM PER IGNOTIVS OPVS ARTIFICEM PROBAT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blank Posted April 7, 2007 Share Posted April 7, 2007 Anyhow, despite my enthusiasm for interesting discussions regarding the direction of RPGs, I must say that I've always considered them rather futile. The game industry, like most popular mediums, pays little attention to theory - it is nothing if not practical, and learns only by example. No amount of critique or debate will ever convince the suits to try something new, but when someone creates a truly fad-worthy game that makes non-lineartiy the Next Big Thing, we'll see all that you desire come to pass. Not before. I think it's important to know what makes a good game, and what things should be there to make it better. Especially if you aspire to be a game developer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azarkon Posted April 7, 2007 Share Posted April 7, 2007 My impression is that it's not the game developers who are in charge... There are doors Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark_Raven Posted April 8, 2007 Share Posted April 8, 2007 The publishers are large and in charge. Hades was the life of the party. RIP You'll be missed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
@\NightandtheShape/@ Posted April 8, 2007 Share Posted April 8, 2007 I wasn't implying that you didn't ... I was trying to expand for the other readers. In that case... I thank ye kindly. "I'm a programmer at a games company... REET GOOD!" - Me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morgoth Posted April 8, 2007 Share Posted April 8, 2007 The publishers are large and in charge. Which are in return driven by the arrogant and selfish thinking customers. Rain makes everything better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maria Caliban Posted April 8, 2007 Share Posted April 8, 2007 Why should consumers be anything but selfish when it comes to shelling out $60 for entertainment? If I didn't feel like being selfish, I'd donate the money to Greenpeace instead. "When is this out. I can't wait to play it so I can talk at length about how bad it is." - Gorgon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hell Kitty Posted April 8, 2007 Share Posted April 8, 2007 (edited) Games are luxury items, so calling people who buy them selfish seems kinda redundant. Edited April 8, 2007 by Hell Kitty Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morgoth Posted April 8, 2007 Share Posted April 8, 2007 Eh? People get me wrong. This is aimed towards the retardos that always claim how evil publishers are and yet exactly buy these games that they think are the reason for the decline of quality. Whatever. Don't buy that crap you always criticize so vigorously. Rain makes everything better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hell Kitty Posted April 8, 2007 Share Posted April 8, 2007 ^ Whiners like that are such a small minority that they don't really drive anything and are thus irrelevant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metadigital Posted April 9, 2007 Share Posted April 9, 2007 Why should consumers be anything but selfish when it comes to shelling out $60 for entertainment? If I didn't feel like being selfish, I'd donate the money to Greenpeace instead. *tangent alert* I lost all respect for Greenpeace when the Paul Watson, a co-founder, left after they tried to ban Chlorine. "Isn't that an element of the periodic table?" OBSCVRVM PER OBSCVRIVS ET IGNOTVM PER IGNOTIVS OPVS ARTIFICEM PROBAT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
@\NightandtheShape/@ Posted April 9, 2007 Share Posted April 9, 2007 Why should consumers be anything but selfish when it comes to shelling out $60 for entertainment? If I didn't feel like being selfish, I'd donate the money to Greenpeace instead. *tangent alert* I lost all respect for Greenpeace when the Paul Watson, a co-founder, left after they tried to ban Chlorine. "Isn't that an element of the periodic table?" Greenpeace! Enviromental terrorists LOL. "I'm a programmer at a games company... REET GOOD!" - Me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now