Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Core 2 Duo (Conroe) the new king
Posted 18 July 2006 - 07:13 AM
I'm probably gonna try to get a Conroe system this fall.. been sticking with AMD since my first own home-built PC.. *sniff*
Posted 18 July 2006 - 08:51 AM
Core 2 Extreme X6800 $999
Core 2 Duo E6700 $530
Core 2 Duo E6600 $316
Core 2 Duo E6400 $224
Core 2 Duo E6300 $183
Pentium D 960 $316
Pentium D 950 $224
Pentium D 945 $163
Pentium D 915 $133
Pentium D 820 $113
Pentium D 805 $93
Intel's prices are very reasonable given they have no competition.
It's a great year for PC users. :cool:
I guess you weren't buying computers in 1999.
Posted 18 July 2006 - 08:51 AM
Posted 18 July 2006 - 08:53 AM
Posted 18 July 2006 - 10:45 AM
Like I said, yay competition. Regardless of which camp you're in, you're getting processors for cheaper than you would otherwise.
Posted 18 July 2006 - 11:30 AM
Posted 18 July 2006 - 11:46 AM
Posted 18 July 2006 - 12:16 PM
The idea was to have an insanely fast execution core that is clocked at twice the speed of the already ridiculously clocked front end. A 3.8GHz Penium4's ALUs actually ran at 7.6GHz. The instruction scheduling logic was another insane piece of work. It all just crashed heavily when clocks reached close to 4 GHz and power consumption shot up though the roof.
I have never hesitated to ridicule Netburst in the past, but in truth the Hammer, Conroe etc. are fairly traditional uarchs: evolutionary derivatives of the P6 (Pentium II). Netburst dared to be different, but it just didn't work. Intel should have killed it off 2 years earlier; it would have died a much more honorable death back then.
Posted 18 July 2006 - 01:22 PM
Posted 18 July 2006 - 01:34 PM
Posted 18 July 2006 - 01:49 PM
P6 (Pentium II) -> PIII -> Banias -> Dothan -> Yonah -> Merom -> Conroe.
Banias, Dothan, Yonah and Merom are all Israeli Pentium M/Centrino cores. Merom has not yet been released. I don't think Conroe was ready until recently. It's true that if Portland had started working on this line in parallel with Haifa instead of focusing all of their efforts on Netburst derivatives, Conroe might have been born a lot sooner.
Posted 19 July 2006 - 12:28 PM
Posted 20 July 2006 - 12:15 AM
Posted 20 July 2006 - 12:22 AM
Posted 20 July 2006 - 12:27 AM
I've been an Asus fan for pretty much my entire life though (motherboard wise...not sold on their video cards)
Posted 20 July 2006 - 12:56 AM
Posted 20 July 2006 - 03:39 AM
This is also my fear. The Conroe processors sound like such a better deal than anything else available that at the moment I'm feeling it's worth the wait, but only for a month or two. If they're delayed or not available for ages, then I'm getting an Athlon.
Make sure you're not always waiting.
Posted 20 July 2006 - 06:10 AM
I believe their current direct competitor would in fact be DFI. They market themselves in the same (crazy) segment of hardware buyers. MSI doesn't have such a hot marketvalue (in Sweden at least) and ASUS have such a wide array of products that they're not exactly in the same segment either. The expensive ASUS (Deluxe models) is a bit like Abit used to be.
Hmm... I've never tried Abit. Would you put them in the same league as DFI, MSI and ASUS?
I have an Abit motherboard in my own computer and an ASUS in my girlfriends computer. The Abit is much more versatile when it comes to overclocking (and tweaking memory latency) but the ASUS has a MUCH smarter motherboard layout. I recently bought a Zalman fan for my (overclocked) CPU and the damn motherboard is so stupidly built that I had to cut off a big piece of metal from the cooler just to get it to fit.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users