Jump to content

2006 FIFA World Cup


Guest The Architect

Recommended Posts

Japan's a neat team, raelly neat passing when they're in the mood and nice wing attacks. Too bad their strikers aren't as good as what their play deserves and their preferred method of attack is to get high crosses to the strikers but too bad they're going to get owned in the air.

Spreading beauty with my katana.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My favourite 8 teams:

 

England

Australia

USA

Ivory Coast

Holland

Japan

Serbia-Montenegro

Sweden

 

 

The one's I'd deem best at the moment:

 

Brazil

Holland

Spain

Argentina

Czech Republic

Italy (here's hoping they choke!)

France

Germany

 

 

The ones I see making the quarters:

 

QF1

GERvSM

QF2

CZEvFRA

QF3

ENGvIVC

QF4

BRAvKO

 

 

BBC World Cup 2006 Predictor

 

Mine(fixed)

Edited by Baley
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm an England fan at at heart but Sven's offensive choices have been beyond moronic. Theo ****ing Walcott? The boy's got skill but he's too damn young and unexperienced! Rooney was playing regular premiership matches when he got picked, not the same thing! Walcott has been on the reserves at Arsenal for a while now. It's shameful, Sven hasn't even seen him play a single match! The bastard even admitted it! With Rooney injured and Owen severely out of shape, the team's got to rely on bloody Crouch! Crouch of all people! Would it have ****ing killed him to have picked Fowler, he's in pretty good shape! Or Teddy Sheringham! He can outfox any of these new guys any day of the week.

 

 

it's one out of 23 players. please, get a grip on yourself. besides, ronaldo and eto'o were both selected for their countries and went to the world cup at the age of 17. if owen is injured, walcott is the only english player with extrordinary pace that can make runs behind the defenses.

 

just like crouch; sure, there are better players than him, but none better target men. the england squad isn't made up of the 23 best players. it's not even made up of the 23 players that deserve it the most. it's made up of those players that eriksson think he needs to implement his prefered tactics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you understand the burden a world cup match puts on a young player?

 

Ronaldo didn't play a single match for Brazil in 94. They had Romario and Bebeto in top shape, they didn't need him nor depend on him.

 

I don't really remember Eto'o in 98. But I think Cameroon wasn't depending on him either.

 

Ashley Cole is fast as hell, that doesn't make him a dependable striker. It takes more than speed. Walcott is unexperienced as hell. He's a decent enough runner I'll give you that, but there's more to being a striker than mere speed!

 

Walcott hasn't been playing enough matches, he's young and he's raw, as I already stated the way Eriksson treated the matter is shameful at best. ( i.e.)

 

Thank you for schooling me in Eriksson's tactics. How dare I question their quality! Surely critique is dead and we must all have blind faith in our ruling coaches! Long live the Coach!

 

Crouch is an above average target man sure, but old man Eriksson is set in his ways, he might surprise us but I doubt it, he'll probably play Crouch as a lone striker. He's not fast enough nor strong enough for that.

 

Anyway if England's gonna score my money's on one of them mid-fielders or hell, John Terry if Beckham get's the old foot in good shape.

 

Here's hoping they play Cole in Rooney's place instead.

Edited by Baley
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Heh. I for one doubt Sven plans Walcott to play much, at all. If you've seen him in Southampton, he is good, and he has played in the premiership. However, I agree that we probably wouldn't see him score lots of goals for England.

 

Problem is that Defoe, Bent and Vassell are all pretty crap choices on a World Cup level. Maybe he should just have left Rooney out, there's no way he will be able to do mor ethan hobble onto the pitch and fall over. :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, here's what I got. Please excuse the lame formatting.

 

Summary:

 

World Cup 2006

Winner: ARG

2nd: HOL

3rd: BRA

 

Elimination round

POLvSWE - Sweden

 

ARGvPOR - Argentina

 

ENGvGER - England

 

MEXvHOL - Holland

 

ITAvJAP - Italy

 

FRAvTUN - France

 

BRAvCZE - Brazil

 

SPAvSWI - Spain

 

 

QUARTER FINALS

QF1

SWEvARG - Argentina

QF2

ITAvFRA - Italy

QF3

ENGvHOL - Holland

QF4

BRAvSPA - Brazil

 

SEMI FINALS

SF1

ARGvITA - Argentina

SF2

HOLvBRA - Holland

 

FINAL AND THIRD PLACE

 

WORLD CUP FINAL

ARGvHOL - Argentina

THIRDPLACE

ITAvBRA - Brazil

Spreading beauty with my katana.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Germany will puncture through like a Panzer blitzing into Russia! :devil:

 

... only, that didn't end very well now did it? <_<

DENMARK!

 

It appears that I have not yet found a sig to replace the one about me not being banned... interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just watched the final, eh?

 

Well, mother****ing mother of God, ****, ****, ****, what a ****ing awesome game, mother****ing awesome saves by Reina, **** me what a ****ing final!

 

I think you've pretty much summed up everyone's thoughts on the final right there.

Just because you're a bit thinner than your even fatter mum it doesn't mean you're in excellent physical shape, if you could fit through the door and view the normal people you'd notice that cheeseburger boy. Squid suck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...