karka Posted March 2, 2006 Share Posted March 2, 2006 This "score" thing in the Wolf is funny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alanschu Posted March 2, 2006 Share Posted March 2, 2006 Hehe, I forgot all about that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metadigital Posted March 2, 2006 Share Posted March 2, 2006 Um. I have a copy of Wolfenstein-3D, and it looks better than that ... did they make an update / sequel? OBSCVRVM PER OBSCVRIVS ET IGNOTVM PER IGNOTIVS OPVS ARTIFICEM PROBAT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
karka Posted March 2, 2006 Share Posted March 2, 2006 (edited) Yes. Return to Castle Wolfenstein. Edited March 2, 2006 by karka Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diogo Ribeiro Posted March 2, 2006 Author Share Posted March 2, 2006 I still prefer Super 3D Noah's Ark. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metadigital Posted March 2, 2006 Share Posted March 2, 2006 Yes. Return to Castle Wolfenstein. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Ah. That'sit! OBSCVRVM PER OBSCVRIVS ET IGNOTVM PER IGNOTIVS OPVS ARTIFICEM PROBAT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BattleCookiee Posted March 2, 2006 Share Posted March 2, 2006 alanschu just confirmed that even from the beginning people cared more about graphics in FPS than gameplay " And quality-terms are; LIGHTMAPING TEXTURED BARRELS And I knew there was Multiplayer in Doom... but it wasn't internet so I just did some bad word choosing... :"> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metadigital Posted March 2, 2006 Share Posted March 2, 2006 Donkey Kong barrels? OBSCVRVM PER OBSCVRIVS ET IGNOTVM PER IGNOTIVS OPVS ARTIFICEM PROBAT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alanschu Posted March 2, 2006 Share Posted March 2, 2006 I'd suspect you are part of an excruciatingly small minority of people that think the gameplay between the two games are on par. The level design was light years ahead of anything Wolfenstein 3D could do, because of the engine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metadigital Posted March 2, 2006 Share Posted March 2, 2006 True, Mr Carmack made his phenomenal reputation on that game ... OBSCVRVM PER OBSCVRIVS ET IGNOTVM PER IGNOTIVS OPVS ARTIFICEM PROBAT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moose Posted March 2, 2006 Share Posted March 2, 2006 What makes Lionheart so bad? Unfinished? Something else? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Lack of depth. Not particularly intellectual. 'Unfinished' - I never actually completed it mind; quit before arriving at England. If you're not a Diablo fan take all those feeling and they translate well to Lionheart. There are none that are right, only strong of opinion. There are none that are wrong, only ignorant of facts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BattleCookiee Posted March 2, 2006 Share Posted March 2, 2006 I already get the point alanschu; Good games are good games because of better graphical engines! Rule of the old, rule of the new... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alanschu Posted March 2, 2006 Share Posted March 2, 2006 Don't be so obtuse. Grow up. Doom > Wolf3D in every aspect, not just graphics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
karka Posted March 2, 2006 Share Posted March 2, 2006 Doom's interface doesn't even show your score! How can it be better? :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gabrielle Posted March 2, 2006 Share Posted March 2, 2006 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Llyranor Posted March 2, 2006 Share Posted March 2, 2006 Give it up, alanschu. You'll never win! Never! (Approved by Fio, so feel free to use it) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alanschu Posted March 2, 2006 Share Posted March 2, 2006 It is rather like arguing with Magical Volo, now that you mention it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gabrielle Posted March 2, 2006 Share Posted March 2, 2006 You guys have no life. So many pages to read through since I signed off this morning? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BattleCookiee Posted March 2, 2006 Share Posted March 2, 2006 Well, I am basing it on when I played both around the release of Unreal Tournament... so for me it was all about the gameplay; I played UT if I wanted graphics. And I won't budge on this one, whatever you gonna try... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metadigital Posted March 2, 2006 Share Posted March 2, 2006 So you are admitting that you are impervious to logic? OBSCVRVM PER OBSCVRIVS ET IGNOTVM PER IGNOTIVS OPVS ARTIFICEM PROBAT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diogo Ribeiro Posted March 2, 2006 Author Share Posted March 2, 2006 He'd be the first to admit it in these forums. Certainly should net him some sort of award. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Llyranor Posted March 2, 2006 Share Posted March 2, 2006 <3 Darwin awards (Approved by Fio, so feel free to use it) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BattleCookiee Posted March 2, 2006 Share Posted March 2, 2006 So you are admitting that you are impervious to logic? Logic != fun Fun != logic for some it seems... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShadowPaladin V1.0 Posted March 2, 2006 Share Posted March 2, 2006 Doom was shareware. Quake is usually where people go for the game that started the FPS ball rolling. I have to agree with Volourn. Bioware is pretty much dead now. Deals like this kills development studios. 478327[/snapback] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alanschu Posted March 3, 2006 Share Posted March 3, 2006 Quake was released via Shareware as well. It's big impact was large scale internet multiplayer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts