Jump to content

SW: Empire At War Demo!


karka

Recommended Posts

It can get pretty chaotic.  I always suck at selecting units though.

Sounds like a lot of micromanagement. Does it get in the way of tactical planning?

 

 

Well, for me, it doesn't so much get in the way of tactical planning...but perhaps execution. I'm sure with proper grouping I would do way better though.

 

I do wish you could zoom out just a little bit more though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, execution.

 

That's always been my main gripe with standard RTS games. Micromanagement having too much of an emphasis, with the player with the most clicks-per-second having the edge even with inferior tactics.

 

Hopefully, with games like Supreme Command and Sins of a Solar Empire, what with their supposed emphasis on strategy (more than micro/tactics), strategy will play a bigger role in the genre.

Hadescopy.jpg

(Approved by Fio, so feel free to use it)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The galactic map would have interested me, if it weren't turn-based (similar to the Total War series, it seems). Counter-intuitive, perhaps, but when you take into consideration that the only mp mode that will allow it is 1v1, it holds zero appeal to me. MP Skirmish by itself is just about every other RTS ever released. I'm a coop player, whether it's against other players or AI.

 

Hopefully, Sins of a Solar Empire will be what EaW *could* have been. A RT4X game, where you manage an empire in real-time, acting as both emperor and fleet commander (or multiple fleet commanders at once, since it's all in real-time and you can have multiple battles going on at once). Automation and good AI is the way of the future, as opposed to current micromanagement - granted that the AI must be actually good, of course. When grand-scale strategy is more important than dancing your units or clicking on memorized order patterns, I'm in.

Hadescopy.jpg

(Approved by Fio, so feel free to use it)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't get the impression that the Galactic Map was turn based.

 

There's a play/pause button, as well as an accelerate time button. If it's turn based, then it is a wierd turn based interface.

 

 

 

It's funny that you mention that good AI is the future, as I was part of a research project last summer where the focus was on a smart AI for RTS games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My bad, then. In any case, 1v1 is what killed it, not the turn-based aspect in itself (which would have led to a 1v1 only system - which it is, so it's all moot).

 

AI in RTS is very important. AI should be what's doing the micromanagement. The player should be doing the strategizing. Otherwise, I'm better off playing an action game.

 

The design philosophy behind future are what's promising. Supreme Commander's "Tanks are very very slow" and "Maps are very very large" by design makes it so that fast-clicking won't really save the day, but long-term planning and bigger strategies will.

 

Same with Sins of a Solar Empire. The fact that it takes a capital ship around 70 secs to get from a planetary near-surface to far-orbit given the sheer size of space (thus, you need this long to go to "hyperspace", or retreat) means that planning ahead is much more important than fast-clicking.

 

Let's look at some of that game's facts:

"Star - 50,000m

Planet - 15,000m

Capital ship - 500m

Fighter - 20m

 

The distance from the atmosphere to the far orbit is on the order of 40,000m.

A single solar system is on the order of 8,000,000 m from end to end.

The distance between the 2 closest solar systems is around 250,000,000 m."

Hadescopy.jpg

(Approved by Fio, so feel free to use it)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unfortunately coop doesn't seem to be high up on the list.

 

 

Though I did talk with a fellow from Bioware that was telling me that coop is actually more difficult to implement that it sounds, which is why it often doesn't make the cut in today's games.

 

I can't really remember his explanation though, as it was a few months ago...but I do remember it actually being a plausible explanation. Though I don't think he was talking about RTS games. It would be "interesting" to have two sides share the same team in Empire at War. People would be bickering about resources and what to build and all that.

 

 

I miss coop :huh:

Edited by alanschu
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, I'm busy for the next week :huh:

 

On the other hand, that's what the Xfire network is for. We have a couple of others that play Civ4 as well. Speaking of which, we haven't been playing enough Civ4 together.

 

But let's not get off-topic. Which we haven't already.

 

In other news, EaW with coop would have been cooler.

Hadescopy.jpg

(Approved by Fio, so feel free to use it)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's so hard to please Gabrielle.

Lou Gutman, P.I.- It's like I'm not even trying anymore!
http://theatomicdanger.iforumer.com/index....theatomicdanger

One billion b-balls dribbling simultaneously throughout the galaxy. One trillion b-balls being slam dunked through a hoop throughout the galaxy. I can feel every single b-ball that has ever existed at my fingertips. I can feel their collective knowledge channeling through my viens. Every jumpshot, every rebound and three-pointer, every layup, dunk, and free throw. I am there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...