Gabrielle Posted November 7, 2005 Share Posted November 7, 2005 No T4. If it didn't have Arnie in it, what good would it be. Plus Arnie is getting too old. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Judge Hades Posted November 7, 2005 Share Posted November 7, 2005 Actually lets leave time travel out of this. This could be a new trilogy set during the war and deals with the events that lead to the time travel in the previous movies and the consequences afterwards. If you mess with time, time messes with you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Akhan225 Posted November 7, 2005 Share Posted November 7, 2005 No T4. If it didn't have Arnie in it, what good would it be. Plus Arnie is getting too old. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Not to mention that he still might be the Governer of Califorinia. T3 was a semi-good action movie, but it was hard to associate it with the Terminator, because it didnt have the same feel to it with so much CGI in place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gabrielle Posted November 7, 2005 Share Posted November 7, 2005 No T4. If it didn't have Arnie in it, what good would it be. Plus Arnie is getting too old. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Not to mention that he still might be the Governer of Califorinia. T3 was a semi-good action movie, but it was hard to associate it with the Terminator, because it didnt have the same feel to it with so much CGI in place. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Too much CGI ruins a movie. What ever happen to the good old days of using models and stuff like that? I found T3 depressing at the end, because the end of the world happened after all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Judge Hades Posted November 7, 2005 Share Posted November 7, 2005 I loved T3. T2 was the worse of the bunch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Volourn Posted November 7, 2005 Share Posted November 7, 2005 No. T1 was. DWARVES IN PROJECT ETERNITY = VOLOURN HAS PLEDGED $250. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Judge Hades Posted November 7, 2005 Share Posted November 7, 2005 I liked T1. T1 was pretty kickarse. T2, the original cut, was pretty crappy. The Director's Cut was better, but still worse than T1 but only marginally. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Volourn Posted November 7, 2005 Share Posted November 7, 2005 (edited) I never said T1 sucked. I said it was the worst of the bunch. It's putrid 'romance' si one of the main culprits as wella s the fact that the actor who played the 'hero' was crap and brought the whole picture down. The romance in T3 was done very well in comparison. And, heck, the 'romance' between Terminator and Sarah in T2 was more believeable than the T1 romance. Hahahaha. Edited November 7, 2005 by Volourn DWARVES IN PROJECT ETERNITY = VOLOURN HAS PLEDGED $250. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Judge Hades Posted November 7, 2005 Share Posted November 7, 2005 But we got to see Linda Hamilton naked. You didn't get that in T2. T1 is better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gabrielle Posted November 7, 2005 Share Posted November 7, 2005 But we got to see Linda Hamilton naked. You didn't get that in T2. T1 is better. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Men Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Judge Hades Posted November 7, 2005 Share Posted November 7, 2005 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Launch Posted November 7, 2005 Share Posted November 7, 2005 Your preference over the three Terminator movies depends on what you look for in a movie DL [color=gray][i]OO-TINI![/i][/color] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Judge Hades Posted November 7, 2005 Share Posted November 7, 2005 Well, I was expecting a ending to the trilogy with T3 and it was a very good ending. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gabrielle Posted November 7, 2005 Share Posted November 7, 2005 In T1 at least we got to see Arnies backside. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Launch Posted November 7, 2005 Share Posted November 7, 2005 In T1 at least we got to see Arnies backside. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Sorry Gabs, I love you but... [color=gray][i]OO-TINI![/i][/color] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gabrielle Posted November 8, 2005 Share Posted November 8, 2005 In T1 at least we got to see Arnies backside. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Sorry Gabs, I love you but... <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Launch Posted November 8, 2005 Share Posted November 8, 2005 <{POST_SNAPBACK}> It's true Gabs... man butt in general is ugly... they're only good for... ermm... well... I shouldn't say... [color=gray][i]OO-TINI![/i][/color] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gabrielle Posted November 8, 2005 Share Posted November 8, 2005 <{POST_SNAPBACK}> It's true Gabs... man butt in general is ugly... they're only good for... ermm... well... I shouldn't say... <{POST_SNAPBACK}> But it's muscular and firm. Imagine what else could be if they did a frontal. :"> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Surreptishus Posted November 8, 2005 Share Posted November 8, 2005 biting? slapping? rubbing? waxing? Ooh i've just excited meself... one moment... there. :"> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Surreptishus Posted November 8, 2005 Share Posted November 8, 2005 <{POST_SNAPBACK}> It's true Gabs... man butt in general is ugly... they're only good for... ermm... well... I shouldn't say... <{POST_SNAPBACK}> But it's muscular and firm. Imagine what else could be if they did a frontal. :"> <{POST_SNAPBACK}> He's done naked pics for a gay porn mag you know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gabrielle Posted November 8, 2005 Share Posted November 8, 2005 <{POST_SNAPBACK}> It's true Gabs... man butt in general is ugly... they're only good for... ermm... well... I shouldn't say... <{POST_SNAPBACK}> But it's muscular and firm. Imagine what else could be if they did a frontal. :"> <{POST_SNAPBACK}> He's done naked pics for a gay porn mag you know. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I'm not going to say any more. I'm blushing as it is. :"> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Launch Posted November 8, 2005 Share Posted November 8, 2005 But it's muscular and firm. Imagine what else could be if they did a frontal. :"> <{POST_SNAPBACK}> My imagination won't allow me... but that has something to do with my childhood obsession of wanting him to adopt me and be my dad... I guess I can never look at Arnie and think " " Plus, he's just too muscular for my liking... DL P.S. Biting... :"> [color=gray][i]OO-TINI![/i][/color] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gabrielle Posted November 8, 2005 Share Posted November 8, 2005 Plus, he's just too muscular for my liking... DL P.S. Biting... :"> <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I like them big and muscular. Nice big strong arms wrapping around my body...... " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lyric Suite Posted November 8, 2005 Share Posted November 8, 2005 (edited) It's putrid 'romance' si one of the main culprits as wella s the fact that the actor who played the 'hero' was crap and brought the whole picture down. The 'romance' part of the film was bad, but it only lasted a few minutes. In T2 we have to deal with that atrociously annoying kid the whole time, much MUCH worst if you ask me. T1 also gets the credit for introducing the premise of the series, and i love the brooding sci-fi setting much better then the PG-13 kiddie crap we get in T2. I also think the lead actor in T1 was decently capable in both his role in T1 as well as Aliens. You also get a humorous duet from Paul Winfield and Lance Henriksen. In T2 we get an histerical Linda Hamilton, the above mentioned kid whom you wish dead for the duration of the film, a GOOD Terminator (what the hell ? ), and a series of blank characters horribly cut into the film. (the whole Dr. Silberman ordeal was terribly anticlimatix). Sorry, but the only good thing about T2 was Robert Patrick as the T1000, the rest of the film was an high budged crap fest. I'm also taken aback that you would choose the abomination that was T3 (seriously) over T1. I wouldn't consider T1 a 'great' film, but the only thing you can fault the movie for is being relatively low budged if compared to the other 2. You really have poor taste in movies, i must say... Edited November 8, 2005 by Lyric Suite Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lyric Suite Posted November 8, 2005 Share Posted November 8, 2005 But it's muscular and firm. Imagine what else could be if they did a frontal. :"> <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Please please please please somebody remove that mental image out of my head... :ph34r: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now