Does anyone have a link to Sammael's BG3 FAQ?

[GhostofAnakin]

Doies anyoiine want toi guiess when we will see a goioid rpg that is like what van buiren and jeffersoiin was suippoisied toii be?

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

Never. Because it's pretty obvious that you have a specific view of what a "good" rpg is and unless a developer copies PS:T, BG or FO 100% EXACTLY like they were, then you don't seem inclined to change your view. Which is your choice, of course. But it's a rather narrow view of what a good game should be.

[Musopticon?]

"unless a developer copies PS:T, BG or FO 100% EXACTLY like they were, then you don't seem inclined to change your view"

 

Sounds very codexian.

[roshan]

Doies anyoiine want toi guiess when we will see a goioid rpg that is like what van buiren and jeffersoiin was suippoisied toii be?

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

Never. Because it's pretty obvious that you have a specific view of what a "good" rpg is and unless a developer copies PS:T, BG or FO 100% EXACTLY like they were, then you don't seem inclined to change your view. Which is your choice, of course. But it's a rather narrow view of what a good game should be.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

 

Well BIS almoisit made the game I wanted..... twice, and boith times the games were cancelled by herve caen.

[Sammael]

"unless a developer copies PS:T, BG or FO 100% EXACTLY like they were, then you don't seem inclined to change your view"

 

Sounds very codexian.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Nah, not really. Codex people don't really care for PS:T or BG.

[kumquatq3]

Doies anyoiine want toi guiess when we will see a goioid rpg that is like what van buiren and jeffersoiin was suippoisied toii be?

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

Never. Because it's pretty obvious that you have a specific view of what a "good" rpg is and unless a developer copies PS:T, BG or FO 100% EXACTLY like they were, then you don't seem inclined to change your view. Which is your choice, of course. But it's a rather narrow view of what a good game should be.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

Of a good game? Yes, that would be a narrow view.

 

but he said a good RPG.

[Musopticon?]

"unless a developer copies PS:T, BG or FO 100% EXACTLY like they were, then you don't seem inclined to change your view"

 

Sounds very codexian.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Nah, not really. Codex people don't really care for PS:T or BG.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Ah you're right, I meant the attitude, not the games in question.

[EnderAndrew]

Codexians are my hero!

[roshan]

Doies anyoiine want toi guiess when we will see a goioid rpg that is like what van buiren and jeffersoiin was suippoisied toii be?

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

Never. Because it's pretty obvious that you have a specific view of what a "good" rpg is and unless a developer copies PS:T, BG or FO 100% EXACTLY like they were, then you don't seem inclined to change your view. Which is your choice, of course. But it's a rather narrow view of what a good game should be.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

Of a good game? Yes, that would be a narrow view.

 

but he said a good RPG.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

Theres a difference between a goioid game and a goioid rpg???? Thats quiiite suirprising!!!