EnderAndrew Posted July 15, 2005 Posted July 15, 2005 Manhunter was that violent and didn't piss anyone off.
metadigital Posted July 15, 2005 Posted July 15, 2005 Terrible, apparently. OBSCVRVM PER OBSCVRIVS ET IGNOTVM PER IGNOTIVS OPVS ARTIFICEM PROBAT
EnderAndrew Posted July 15, 2005 Posted July 15, 2005 I didn't play it so I wouldn't know. But I question the morality of a society where brutal murder is acceptable, but sex is not.
ShadowPaladin V1.0 Posted July 15, 2005 Author Posted July 15, 2005 The title is misleading. Rockstar put in the sex-game that got everyone so upset and left in the code. Mod-makers aren't really responsible for this whole mess. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Thay have admitted to it now ? I have to agree with Volourn. Bioware is pretty much dead now. Deals like this kills development studios. 478327[/snapback]
BattleCookiee Posted July 15, 2005 Posted July 15, 2005 Manhunter was that violent and didn't piss anyone off. That's because: A 17 Year old killing people is GOOD A 17 Year old f*cking woman is EVIL And if a American Senator let his 12- Year old Son play this game, and finds him jacking off because of Pixel-p0rn, we are all screwed...
metadigital Posted July 15, 2005 Posted July 15, 2005 I didn't play it so I wouldn't know. But I question the morality of a society where brutal murder is acceptable, but sex is not. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Yeah! We need a more Nordic / Norse / Wiccan concept of brutal beatial rape, killing and bathing in the sacrificial blood (and then eating it). OBSCVRVM PER OBSCVRIVS ET IGNOTVM PER IGNOTIVS OPVS ARTIFICEM PROBAT
EnderAndrew Posted July 15, 2005 Posted July 15, 2005 Rockstar doesn't need to admit to it. People have found the graphics in the XBox version using cheats, and actually unlocked it in the PC version with this mod.
alanschu Posted July 15, 2005 Posted July 15, 2005 I didn't play it so I wouldn't know. But I question the morality of a society where brutal murder is acceptable, but sex is not. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I find the more we try to restrict sex, the more fascinated we are by it. I'm sure if we were all nekkid all the time, no one would care about catching a peek of anyone's jubblies, since it'd be so meh.
Diogo Ribeiro Posted July 15, 2005 Posted July 15, 2005 Yeah! We need a more Nordic / Norse / Wiccan concept of brutal rape, killing and bathing in the sacrificial blood. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Not necessarily in that order, o'course.
metadigital Posted July 15, 2005 Posted July 15, 2005 I didn't play it so I wouldn't know. But I question the morality of a society where brutal murder is acceptable, but sex is not. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I find the more we try to restrict sex, the more fascinated we are by it. I'm sure if we were all nekkid all the time, no one would care about catching a peek of anyone's jubblies, since it'd be so meh. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Most people's jubblies aren't worth a first look. OBSCVRVM PER OBSCVRIVS ET IGNOTVM PER IGNOTIVS OPVS ARTIFICEM PROBAT
alanschu Posted July 15, 2005 Posted July 15, 2005 I'm all about freedom! :D EDIT: Referring to Role-Player's decision to vary the order of blood bathing and what not, not looking at jubblies.
EnderAndrew Posted July 15, 2005 Posted July 15, 2005 I don't tire of looking at naughty bits, including those owned and operated by my wife.
ShadowPaladin V1.0 Posted July 15, 2005 Author Posted July 15, 2005 Rockstar doesn't need to admit to it. People have found the graphics in the XBox version using cheats, and actually unlocked it in the PC version with this mod. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Kind of dumb of them to deny it then really. They will probably end up getting more stick for lying (as well as having any future games subject to extreme scrutiny by the censors) than they would from just fessing up. I have to agree with Volourn. Bioware is pretty much dead now. Deals like this kills development studios. 478327[/snapback]
alanschu Posted July 15, 2005 Posted July 15, 2005 I didn't play it so I wouldn't know. But I question the morality of a society where brutal murder is acceptable, but sex is not. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I find the more we try to restrict sex, the more fascinated we are by it. I'm sure if we were all nekkid all the time, no one would care about catching a peek of anyone's jubblies, since it'd be so meh. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Most people's jubblies aren't worth a first look. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> That's just it. But even for those people, in our society, we all love a peek since they are so taboo!
Nartwak Posted July 15, 2005 Posted July 15, 2005 But I question the morality of a society where brutal murder is acceptable, but sex is not.
EnderAndrew Posted July 15, 2005 Posted July 15, 2005 I will admit that taboo = fun. However sex isn't just a matter of taboo. It's not taboo in nature, yet animals seem just as obsessed with it. How often does a dog lick itself in a given day, let alone mount legs?
ShadowPaladin V1.0 Posted July 15, 2005 Author Posted July 15, 2005 But I question the morality of a society where brutal murder is acceptable, but sex is not. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Is there such a society? I have to agree with Volourn. Bioware is pretty much dead now. Deals like this kills development studios. 478327[/snapback]
alanschu Posted July 15, 2005 Posted July 15, 2005 Why is a dog going to town on some guy's leg not grounds for NC-17 ratings in movies???
metadigital Posted July 15, 2005 Posted July 15, 2005 I don't tire of looking at naughty bits, including those owned and operated by my wife. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Defence pleads special dispensation, M'lud. A wife is a special case, and does not consitute a legitimate example for the "every person" case, as stated by the prosecutor. Most people's jubblies are like most people, and therefore not worthy of a perve, unless the perver is a repressed coitus-starved teenager, in which case the pixelated colours on the HiRes washing machine read out are almost as useful for auto-eroticism. OBSCVRVM PER OBSCVRIVS ET IGNOTVM PER IGNOTIVS OPVS ARTIFICEM PROBAT
EnderAndrew Posted July 15, 2005 Posted July 15, 2005 I was guilty of the scrambled channel tactics of adolescense.
ShadowPaladin V1.0 Posted July 15, 2005 Author Posted July 15, 2005 Why is a dog going to town on some guy's leg not grounds for NC-17 ratings in movies??? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> For the same reason that you can see animals mating prior to the watershed and humans mating only after it. I have to agree with Volourn. Bioware is pretty much dead now. Deals like this kills development studios. 478327[/snapback]
metadigital Posted July 15, 2005 Posted July 15, 2005 I was guilty of the scrambled channel tactics of adolescense. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Did you manage to complete your mission in the ten second timeslot available? Why is a dog going to town on some guy's leg not grounds for NC-17 ratings in movies??? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> For the same reason that you can see animals mating prior to the watershed and humans mating only after it. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Yeah! Society wants more dogs and cats, and people who mate with dogs and cats, so there is no restriction on that sort of viewing. OBSCVRVM PER OBSCVRIVS ET IGNOTVM PER IGNOTIVS OPVS ARTIFICEM PROBAT
Diogo Ribeiro Posted July 15, 2005 Posted July 15, 2005 in which case the pixelated colours on the HiRes washing machine read out are almost as useful for auto-eroticism. <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
213374U Posted July 15, 2005 Posted July 15, 2005 "Explicit" Sex? I have yet to see this coffee mod, but are you saying that watching this mod would be akin to watching a hardcore pornographic film? Without the close-ups you are used to in porn flicks, and all within the graphic engine of the game, but yes. - When he is best, he is a little worse than a man, and when he is worst, he is little better than a beast.
Recommended Posts