7 hours ago7 hr Damn, the news that Erik Prince was abducted seems to be fake. Why has elegance found so little following? Elegance has the disadvantage that hard work is needed to achieve it and a good education to appreciate it. - Edsger Wybe Dijkstra
4 hours ago4 hr If even Boebert is swaying against the pedophiles now, things must be really bad. "only when you no-life you can exist forever, because what does not live cannot die."
2 minutes ago2 min 7 hours ago, BruceVC said:Thats definitely a concern and something I wasn't aware ofI am very interested in how this unfolds, if you could post examples as time goes on of what sites get banned for " dangerous ideas" or other similar things that would be helpfulI can see the anxiety because words like " dangerous ideas" are very subjective and open to abuse depending on the government and its ideological viewsI found this link specifically around how Denmark has implemented age verification, Im not sure how accurate it is but its similar to other countriesDenmark To Set 15-Year Minimum Age for Social Media UseDenmark becomes the first EU country to set a 15-year minimum age for social media, aiming to protect youth well-being and regulate harmful online exposure.So basically"Under the agreement, individuals under 15 years old will be prohibited from self-registering on designated platforms. Children aged 13 and 14 may access social media only if a parent or guardian permits them.Complementing the age rule, the agreement includes measures to tighten digital “gate-keeping”: monitoring offensive content, preventing aggressive marketing to minors, and limiting the use of children in advertising.In practical terms, enforcement will lean on Denmark’s advanced digital infrastructure. The government plans to use its national electronic ID system and create or require age-verification tools for online platforms. In case of rules being violated, the regulated social platform may face liability for non-compliance with age checks up to 6% of its yearly turnover across the globe, as provided in the EU Digital Services Act (DSA)."So it all seems at the moment to be targeting under 16 only but I understand your concern because it can be extended to now include adults and websites government decides are problematicPersonally I dont support any type of ID age verification for children or adults because of how it has to be implemented, its too invasive when you have to use your actual ID. I realized I actually dont normally give my ID but just my date of birth which is fineI think parents should be more involved and deciding what there kids can or cant see and I dont think the state should enforce these types of measures. But I also understand why we at this point, we have heard endless stories over the last 10 years of the negative impact SM has had on many kids so now governments are acting but they going about it in a way that is getting understandable criticism for the reasons we have discussedI dunno, news organisations going against the orthodoxy, advocating for abandoning Ukraine, advocating for action to stop the Palestinian genocide. We have already seen organisations designated as terrorist, who are but any sane definition definitely not that.the kids would grow up smarter without rotting their brains with American aligned social media, but we can't have censorship, it's too dangerous to let it in. Na na na na na na ... greg358 from Darksouls 3 PVP is a CHEATER. That is all.
Create an account or sign in to comment