It stopped being productive when OP stopped paying attention to criticism to his baseless arguments.
I don't see a point in running this campaign to make fighters OP and so i will participate to resist this change.
Fighters are in good place now, they dont need any nerfs or buffs
Fighters are in a bad place now, cause there is no a single reason to take a fighter in the party now over paladin. Paladin is just a better version of fighter now. I don't have an exact idea how it should be fixed (whether fighters should be buffed or paladins nerfed) but it should be fixed somehow to make fighters usefull and unique again.
I do not agree with this... Fighter is much better at hitting things and he can also apply front line CC. I have no idea where do people get this idea that paladin outshines fighter... the only thing they might outshine the fighter is at holding the line with their slightly higher defenses... Fighter can both hold the line, and deal reasonable damage with weapons, AND he has front line CC capabilities...
Fighters and Paladins are almost equal in their pure offence and defence capabillities now both are good tanks and both are not really good damage dealers, but paladin gets some usefulll unique abilities while figher doesn't have any unique abilities that are usefull enough. So paladin is a better choice for any battle now. As for monks I doubt monk can be a good tank however I didn't use monks much so I can be wrong here.