BruceVC

So declare your opponents as enemies (=far-right, what's a far-right anyway?) of the EU, threaten with sanctions and refuse to debate them. What a time to be alive in this democraship. Original link: http://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/juncker-vows-to-use-new-powers-to-block-the-far-right-nq5r5tnqq No this is necessary to protect these countries from leaving the EU...I can explain it more detail? But its basically the reality that no country will leave the EU...and this is a good thing Why do you even ask permission? Your opinion does exist on the approval others, doesn't it? Yes I am nearly done....and yes I agree there is no point asking for permission but if no one is interested in me writing a long post I wont bother because what would be the point and its a waste of time But I do want to make this point, so I was looking for someone who would read it because its a few paragraphs And then people read it later and comment I don't think these nations need to be protected from leaving the EU. If they decide to do that, then so be it. They're not children and they don't need an overbearing EU sanction government father to protect them from making what he (or you) thinks are dangerous mistakes. Comments like the one from Juncker are also completely and utterly stupid (voting for right-wing populists now becomes the clearest act of defiance available to the general populace), but hey, what can anyone expect from the EPP these days. *sigh* I can understand that view, its reasonable but it ignores the real and extreme economic risk countries face who leave the EU but read my post about this as its aimed at all you guys who live in the EU I'm not trying to scare you or suggest I know more than you but these considerations are from my cousins who are much clever than me and work in emerging markets at HSBC in the UK....they very worried about the future of all countries staying in the EU They have done risk assessments of what if a country leaves the EU and I added my own concerns. I dont think the EU is trying to be condescending but there is real risk that I doubt these right wing parties think of But ultimately this is based on a risk assessment so its just suppose to be a fairly accurate warning...but my cousins are normally accurate. They did one for South Africa and were about 60-70 % right

I was always for Trump. Im sure there was time you did say you weren't going to vote?

So declare your opponents as enemies (=far-right, what's a far-right anyway?) of the EU, threaten with sanctions and refuse to debate them. What a time to be alive in this democraship. Original link: http://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/juncker-vows-to-use-new-powers-to-block-the-far-right-nq5r5tnqq No this is necessary to protect these countries from leaving the EU...I can explain it more detail? But its basically the reality that no country will leave the EU...and this is a good thing Why do you even ask permission? Your opinion does exist on the approval others, doesn't it? Yes I am nearly done....and yes I agree there is no point asking for permission but if no one is interested in me writing a long post I wont bother because what would be the point and its a waste of time But I do want to make this point, so I was looking for someone who would read it because its a few paragraphs And then people read it later and comment

Greens didn't lose Gore the election and if Hillary loses because certain voters think she would make a poor president and said voters go Green instead it's on her for being a bad candidate. I know most of you youngsters were still in diapers back then, but some historical perspective. Gore actually won the popular vote, and only lost Florida by 500 votes. Had Nader not been on the ballot, certainly Gore would've won Florida and the election. But definitely all the lefties should vote Green, Go whatever-her-name! WoD any idea who will you vote for now..Trump is toning down the Rhetoric

I'm still disappointed by your ideological change but I am hoping hard evidence will change your mind I can make that long post if you want about the EU ..but only if you want

Foucault? I had never heard of him but I do know about the psychology of pedophiles and habitual rapists and both these mental sicknesses are normally caused by abuse themselves or childhood trauma ?

I'll be honest there is something none of the guys who live in the EU realize ...I can post it but it will take time?

Roofles What you think rape is about .....wealth or success Do you think Saville only abused kids when he became famous?

So declare your opponents as enemies (=far-right, what's a far-right anyway?) of the EU, threaten with sanctions and refuse to debate them. What a time to be alive in this democraship. Original link: http://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/juncker-vows-to-use-new-powers-to-block-the-far-right-nq5r5tnqq No this is necessary to protect these countries from leaving the EU...I can explain it more detail? But its basically the reality that no country will leave the EU...and this is a good thing

No, power and wealth has nothing to do with there deviance's. This is something that was always in them ...lets not blame material things for mental dysfunction One a true hater of women, he used rape to dominant scores but then the great act on the Cosby Show ...man that takes mental strength And one a licentious abuser of young women and older ones The good news in this type of behavior is less and less likely to be accepted nowadays and more likely will be exposed

There is a pretty big line between adultery and assault. You are looking at the act of the man and not the wife's action or their point of view. Man accused of deviance by a horde of women, wife sticks by mans side, and you say "well the deviance of one is worse by letter of the law." Ok, sure, but the parallel is still there between the wives (the two people I was pointing out). They are both wlling to put up with suspect behavior from their husbands. Which is either a weakness of character or a strength of character depending on how you look at it. I view it as weakness, but perhaps both wives are privvy to information that we are not. I find both acts deplorable, and Cosby's is worse by the view of most of the "western world". The level of criminality in their acts through law and/or as viewed by society is irrelevant. What is relevant is how their infidelity is viewed by their wives. Which is an eerily similar situation. The Cosby's have been married since 1964. So, every example of his guilt is also a betrayal of their marriage. Just like with Bill Clinton. However, both wives sticking around is equally stupid to me. It reeks of dependence, but maybe both are in a marriage of convenience over one of love. It could also be that both marriages are more business arrangements. That is something I would possibly believe with the Clintons, but don't know enough to make that assumption of the Cosby's. Ganrich I am not trying to be condescending as I like you but please tell me you havent said what you said above to any women or people who support gender equality? They will think you are utterly sexist or very unaware of something VERY fundamental Cosby raped dozens of women over the decades..he drugged and raped them and he pretended to be a good family man. I repeat he raped and drugged dozens of women....he was and is a sexual predator ....but he was one of the worst as he was able to hide it Bill Clinton had affairs, he had consensual sex with women. He never raped anyone? You must see the huge difference

There is a pretty big line between adultery and assault. Thats just part of it, I have heard what Ganrich said before, I'm not saying he believes but its similar to other personal attacks from Trump. It doesnt have to be true for them, some of his supporters just have to think its sounds feasible But this is what Hilary expected, Trump is predictable like this. What he doesnt realize is Hilary is much better at playing the " old personal attack " game than he could ever conceive. She just basically ignores it ....the perfect response and just makes her look more reasonable yet highlighting how childish and petty Trump comes across

Volo produce links if you want me to review it

If you want to make a factual comparison I promise I would consider it But dude ...come on its got to be reasonable, when people try to compare Bill Clinton to what Cosby did that just smacks of an unfair and irrelevant comparison and really a personal one ...something Trump would say to his supporters who think its great I am sorry if I seem dismissive but Hilary is going to be the next president and I am going to spend as much time as possible challenging some of more absurd attacks on her that often motivated by the fact she is a women

I remember being in love years ago with different women but nowadays I find I like a women, really like them but that is a far as I feel I'm fine with that as its not like I'm not happy but this whole idea of being in love with a single person , its just a fond memory

I don't know, maybe she actually loves him and the accusers are like a den of vipers who only want fame and money. What do you know? " she loves him " ???? Whats love meshugger to people like us.....you also dont seem to be someone who factors that into why people do things ? No so this is not about love, if for example a women found her husband was a child molester she may still love him but to stand by him would be deplorable. Cosbys wife is obviously completely under his influence...but to actually stand by him when over 50 women are accusing him of rape I dont feel sorry for her, I just think its pathetic and a betrayal of the ordeal all those women went through

She is his wife. There is nothing wrong with wife standing by him when he is accused by moneygrabbers. Sharp_one......I always appreciate your brutal honesty. It demonstrates your bigotry and ignorance but you are one of those rare people who doesn't seem to care

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3606778/Bill-Cosby-arrives-court-smiling-waving-s-set-come-face-face-woman-accused-rape-time-decade.html?ITO=1490&ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490 Guys I said this was inevitable ....and his wife is still standing by him .....50 + women accusing him, what is wrong with his wife ?

Is it really a relevant distinction? It is if the two aren't equivalent. Really.....its significant ? So do we now question the veracity of what people say....I have a large list of things for you guys to check

volo you laughed earlier when Sadie said " she was drawn to the website because of the intelligence ",,,, Do you consider yourself unintelligent ?

I think on the internet you have to at least accept that a person is representing themselves the way they want and address that and apply skepticism where applicable. But that's where making a sweeping generalization becomes a process in futility; when you make a statement like "you think X because you're a white guy" you've moved from accepting that a person is representing who they want to be to accepting that is what they are, and then drawing conclusions based on that. Which, as mentioned in another thread today, means you're drawing a conclusion without having all of the data to make an accurate conclusion. Yes but he has told me he is Czech and we have chatted about his country

How do you know? He is Czech How do you know he is Czech? Why you asking me such silly questions ..its unusual for you ? This was my point; you're assuming that someone on the net hasn't decided to be the person they want to be rather than the person they are. Thats okay, I believe people when they tell me things ....it they want to lie to me thats fine

To be honest its a little annoying, especially when you get told " BruceVC is Oby " Can you think about anyone more unlikely to be Oby ?

How do you know? He is Czech How do you know he is Czech? Why you asking me such silly questions ..its unusual for you ?

Poor Bruce has been damaged by cognitive dissonance. So you think because Obama is shaking his hand that means the Kazakhstan economy is going to be magically transformed? " In 2015, the World Economic Forum compiled its Global Competitiveness Ranking ranking Kazakhstan 50th out of 144 countries.[16] The ranking considers multiple macroeconomic and financial factors, such as market size, GDP, tax rates, infrastructure development, etc.[17] In 2012, the World Economic Forum listed corruption as the biggest problem in doing business in the country,[18] while the World Bank listed Kazakhstan as a corruption hotspot, on a par with Angola, Bolivia, Kenya, Libya and Pakistan.[19] "