obyknven

I am seriously. It's talk about cultural differencies. Western world - safety, safety everywhere. Because this all this drones, non-contact wars and fights only against weak enemies. In unsafe situations Western military forces lost their combat ability and everything become ruined. http://youtu.be/v8RvWIhTls4 Meanwhile in Russia: "you never die twice, but not escape from die once", "Company make death beautyfull" "Russians don't surrender" etc http://www.russiancambridge.org/2007/05/russian-graduate-seminar-aesthetics-of-death-in-the-russian-culture-of-the-silver-age-15-may/ In other words in Russian culture death don't considered as bad thing. As result Russians can stay operational in such situations when any other army has been broken and flee. Actually is nothing unusual here, Russians participaite in wars abowe 900 times over 1000 years, add to this hardest climate in the world and constant internal figth for power, such result of natural selection just cant be another. http://youtu.be/NJj7jlc_59U If people have no fear of death they are completely free and powerful, meanwhile people who fear death are weak and enchained. If you don't trust me you can read same thing in of Saint-Exupery's "Wisdom of the Sands" or in "Seven Pillars of Wisdom" by T. E. Lawrence.

Psychological aspects of war. Tskhinvali, Russian peacekeepers base with smal garrison without heavy weapons. They are outnumbered and surrounded by Georgian troops with extremely bigger firepower (lots of tanks and artillery), half of Russians are die in combat, but they not surrender and continue fight http://youtu.be/FMk_HPD0EtY http://youtu.be/kCfZOf9N2tY Somalia. Best of the best American warriors encounter some resistance and flee. http://snafu-solomon.blogspot.ru/2013/10/seals-get-pushed-back-into-sea-by.html

I talk about childish proportions of their bodies. Looks comical, too much kawaii - its not better decision for horror game. Yes, i understand, West have lack of realistic artists today (realistic art disappeared here in first mid of XX century) and Western developers can't do realistic 2d graphics as, Russians do http://youtu.be/sQCQTUFMiQE but they can choice more suitable art stylization for horror game,. http://youtu.be/IdSpZgE3fD4

http://youtu.be/AQLxdHfMPF8 Interesting idea, but disgusting realisation. This childish art style ruined all atmosphere.

http://thelostwood.com/about_en.html FAQ

Today is Putin's birthday! All Hail the emperor of Mankind!

Women from Russia (she is creator of neo-jews ultra-right extremist movement, her paintings you can watch here - http://rufabula.com/articles/2013/10/04/sad-story ) kill Libyan air force officer and provoke Libyans attack to Russian embassy in Tripoli. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gHl4mnTYOOE

Nicest game ever. 18+ http://youtu.be/WTKINIxkkEQ http://thelostwood.com/en.html

How to you imagine that? How can be possible stole tausands of shipbuilders, sailors, navigators, gunners and many other people for creating navy from nothing? And why our historical major known nothing about Moskovy civil fleets in Barents and Caspian seas? Or why you don't known about similarity between older Russian ships and ships of Peter 1? Anyway Peter 1 create own unique technology of shipbuilding. He also designed majority of ships for own fleet and inventi improved false kill construction (this improwment appeared in Europe only after 140 years ). It's not similar to "stolen". 1915, Osovets, "dead men attack". European soldiers flee because fear of Satan. http://www.erjournal.ru/journals_n/1324195868.pdf Progressive Europeans so progressive Henry VIII of England - executed 84 000 people Elizabeth I of England - executed above 90 000 people Oliver Cromwell - exterminate 80 % of Irish populace Reformation - only on last stage during Thirty Years' War 2 071 000 soldiers and above 6 000 000 civilians are killed, populace of France reduced by 1 000 000, populace of Chzech reduced from 2 000 000 to 700 000, populace of Germany reduced from 17 000 000 to 10 000 000, Meanwhile in Russia most evil Tsar Ivan the Terrible executed 3 000 people.

Again your wet Eurocentric fantasies. Look at this - this is Petersburg of Peter 1 compare to another typical Russian port and now European cities from this time Obviously Petersburg of Peter 1 have own Russian style of architecture instead of Western European. Let's talk better about European "progressive" culture: How Britt's sell ow wifes as slaves on market even in XIX century. Or about European Witch Hunt's, when millions of European women's are burned due ignorance of society. Also explain why "progressive" European's create such "progressive" social institute as inquisition and why protestants during Reformation religious wars exterminate significant part of Europeans. Explain also why Europeans (Germans, Britt's and others) constantly flee into Russia from own homeland's at least from XV - XVI centuries?

O'RLY http://youtu.be/4DZOM8jwy_w No-no. Knights are too dirty. Maybe only in tiny Britain. Russia of Peter of Great yet causing butthurt for you? From 15 century Moscovian principality become one of most progressive state in the world. Russian Regular army appeared in 1550, in England regular army appeared only in 1685, Artillery as separate military branch appeared in Moscovy in 1550, firstly in world, in Europe similar field artillery appeared only in times of Gustavus Adolphus after 1611, calibre standarts and serial production of canons appeared in 1480 in Moscovy, similar thing appeared in Europe only after two centuries etc. Best European scienists just wanted leave own retarded states and emigrate into high tech Russia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrey_Nartov Just for your education http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_Russian_Innovation http://indrus.in/articles/2012/03/16/12_top_russian_inventions_that_changed_the_world_15164.html Actually this list too short, but i fear even this short version can causing extreme bottom pain for proud European supermacist's.

Russia charges Greenpeace activists with piracy http://youtu.be/rJsxuwsE3Hg\ Good-good, Rothschild puppets must suffer.

But you don't show your proofs for this statement. With Russian Empire being an example of that and how other Eurasian cultures that dominated the entire rest of the world without the British culture getting outside it's own borders (effectively). Actually British Empire had been retarded, primarily agrarian despoty with non-educated, medieval populace - If consider British Empire not only as Buckingham Palace, but include all British territories.

Western dreams about Russians. BDSM Brilliant! Mattress against Panzerfaust. Just Life in Russia Typical Russian warriors. Vintage Western image of Russia. Russian Giant swallow French Army Same **** Agai BDSM Cthulhu Fhtagn! Evil Russian Tsar His crown

Oh, Britain! Do you never hear about corruption in European Armies? Osprey even publish book about this: http://www.ospreypublishing.com/store/Military-Misdemeanours_9781846031489 For example in times of Crimean war Britts have wery poor uniform Oh, poor retarded British Empire, their industry cant produce coats and bayonets. Even their migthy fleet have very ****ty canons in end of XIX century. Or example from modern times - f-22 "Raptor", their stealth covering fall apart in the rains, US so backwarded! Lol, Britain constantly dominated Culturally and Technologically by France, Netherlands and Germany. Entire world now used French International System of Units, only "progressive" UK and US continue use obsolete measurement systems. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_System_of_Units http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperial_and_US_customary_measurement_systems

This tread need moar Russophobia http://youtu.be/LMQ2Q-SleHk

Lol, guy never hear about Russain Literature. Just imagine naked Russian armies fougth against French Grande Armée (Rains quite often in Russia). Obvious nonsense. Even don't understand what you trying to say. Probably something about "British Empire is Stronk!". Just few major European conflicts as examples: Thirty Years' War - Tiny English army try figth against France but easily has been defeated. Menawhile in continental Europe titanic forces fougth one agains another, entire lands are deserted, danse makabre etc. Results: France become European hegemon, Spain become minor nation, Sweden rule Baltic region, Holy Roman Empire fallen. Seven Years' War - Again titanic forces fougth in continental Europe. France is European hegemon with strong army, Austria quite strong also, but Russian army even strongest. Prussia have not so strong army but king Frederick II is good commander. He mostly won battles agains French and Austrian troop's, only Russian troops constantly won battles against him. Treacherous Austria constantly try use these victories for yourself until Russian Empire not send own allies GTFO and not signed peace treaty with Prussia. After this Frederick defeat antiprussian coalition, France lost hegemony, Austria lost some territories, Prussia and Russia become more friendly to each other. Tiny English army figth against lov-quality colonal troops in distand non-inhabitted lands. Now they even dont try fougth on main war teatre in Europe. casulaties from war: Austria - 400 000, Prussia - 262 500, France - 168 000, England - 20 000. It's just for understanding how minor role play England in this war. Napoleonic war's: War of the Fourth Coalition (10 000 British troops participiate) - no comment's Peninsular War (~ 25 000 British troops participiate - France use only 1/4 of Invading Army against British and Spanish troops, 3/4 of them fougth against guirella) - no comment's. War of the Fifth Coalition (340,000 Austrians, 40,000 Britits against 275,000 French) - again tiny British army can do nothing. War of the Sixth Coalition (175 000 Russians, 170 000 Prussians, 110 000 Austrians, 28 000 Swedes, 13 000 Germans and 500 Britts against 420 000 French Army ) - Britain so strong again! Hundred Days ( 25 000 Britts, 258 000 Prussians and North Germans, 168 000 Russians, 254 000 Austrians and Southern Germans against 200 000 French Army ) - yet again Britts play minor role. WW1 and WW2 same story. Just a wery arrogant minor nation with megalomania. English language become dominant in Europe only after WW2 (Marshall Plan, NATO and Cold War). Before this in XVII-XIX centuries French language dominant in Europe, in other lands different languages play this role. I ex-Soviet zone of influence (or in land's with significant Russians presense) most dominant language is Russian.

Too much photoshop

It's your proofs? You mean other than the fact that British empire didn't become a local power even in Europe? Or that US were still using slaves until the 1860's? Or that the British royalty deliberately held back scientifica and cultural progress so that they didn't have to deal with a highly educated underclass that'd rise up and attempt to depose them (In British empire even elemental education is not free unti Free Education Act established only in 1891)? And they didn't form the continental empires as Persians, Romans, Russians or Chinese. They weren't even a military power to threaten the continental Europe and own rebelled colonies. Can i say now that British Empire and US: "far behind culturally and scientifically they couldn't afford to. Thus their cultural and political impact is minimal on the world at large"? As to Rome 2: All strategy games become boring in mid/end. This is because extensive gameplay (moar territories and armies to controll, gamer must perform moar similar operations). This can be solved by adding new gameplay elements in the end and by indirect controll + good AI (but as we known CA cant develop good AI and just watching how stupid AI perform turns instead of gamer is boring too).

proof or GTFO

NATO main battle tanks have some problem. Do you try compare APC with main battle tank? You are serious?

2X30mm, Fagot's, automatic grenade launcher, machinegun. Tanks can't shot at top floor's in city fight, too smal angle. http://youtu.be/mbUJ4x5s4qI Wrong, this is heavely protected tank with unmanned turret , not APC as Bradley.