Wrath of Dagon

Actually Bush abrogated the ABM treaty, you don't need agreement from Senate, that's only to ratify. Although NAFTA is probably one of those fake agreements which are designed to get around treaty requirement, so it's actually implemented through legislation. Also there's plenty of money in the budget that the president can use for whatever he sees fit, Obola certainly has. There's plenty of money in the border patrol budget to build fences where necessary, Obola has been spending that money to support illegal alien children residing in the US, as I've said.

It's been said of Churchill that he had 100 ideas a day, 4 of which were good. But hey, that's still 4 good ideas a day!

I'd be OK with some tax increases if they went to deficit reduction. But you know she's going to spend it all and then some, and leave us in a worse financial situation then even now. Are these apparent tax increases legitimate...its the first time I have heard about it but my knowledge of the American tax system and perceived changes to it is lacking But you will also end up paying extra money under Trump, for example how is the Trump Wall going to be funded? Use the money they're now spending on supporting illegal children pouring across the border.

I'd be OK with some tax increases if they went to deficit reduction. But you know she's going to spend it all and then some, and leave us in a worse financial situation than even now.

Not to worry, I'm sure Hilzilla will pick the best people for her administration: https://pjmedia.com/homeland-security/2016/07/27/exclusive-how-hillary-clinton-mainstreamed-al-qaeda-fundraiser-abdurahman-alamoudi/?singlepage=true

You mean the panhandle? I doubt that's true. The Mexico border area certainly is though. And yet the immigration numbers have levelled off... http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/11/19/5-facts-about-illegal-immigration-in-the-u-s/ Establishment lies. It might have leveled off in the worst recession years, but not overall. They've claimed the same number of illegals for over a decade now, who can believe such garbage? Edit: http://cis.org/New-Data-Immigration-Surged-in-2014-and-2015 And even that's based on manipulated government statistics, there is no objective unbiased data.

@Gorth If there are better people out there, they should've run

West Virginia and Virginia are completely different. In fact West Virginia was formed because they didn't want to leave the Union during the Civil War. West Virginia has a lot of coal miners, Virginia has a lot of government employees who live in the suburbs of Washington, D.C. HRC is their nominee. What do you think? We don't want it. 4-5 viable parties would be enough. So, tell me. Did you ever think about why there are only two viable parties? Because it's winner take all. Voting for a third party simply means you're hurting the major party you're ideologically closest to. The best way to fix it is with run-off elections, that should give us 4-5 viable parties that would be optimal. Last I heard, 60% go over the border. You'd need both a fence and someone to go looking for visa overstays. Right now we're doing neither.

The immigration police have been ordered to not only not remove illegals, but to assist them in getting to their destination of choice within the US.

Depending on the context that could be pretty damning. I guess I'll watch it. Yeah, Trump asked the Russians to travel back in time, and hack the e-mails Hilzilla deleted 2 years ago. “We don’t look to be ruled.” President pen and phone. Edit: It's funny how Obola doesn't seem to realize that for us not be "ruled", the government has to follow its own laws, else you just have tyranny.

So you want the Dems to control the Senate in case Trump tries to appoint someone to the Supreme Court who might actually defend the Constitution? OK.

David Burge @iowahawkblog New #DavePoll: which watchdog do you trust more to uncover political and governmental corruption in the US? The New York Times Putin-controlled hackers

Did you forget how you slaughtered the rest of his minions? Do you think he has unlimited resources? In fact the fight just before you get to him was fairly tough IMO.

Behold the consequences of 3 decades spent telling the voters that they can't trust media organizations! (And, you know, the internet killing the economic viability of local investigative reporting.) Well, you can't, it's just a fact. You can still find everything you need on the internet, like the voting record, you don't need investigative reporting for that. I'm not claiming he did anything underhanded that needed to be investigated, but most people don't even bother to check how their Congressman actually votes. You can trust the media on most things, the same stories get told on Al-Jazeera, CNN, Sky, BBC etc. So if the media was indeed untrustworthy that would mean all independent global media houses are complicate in some kind of global deceit and conspiracy theory....and I reject that idea It worries me immensely that you feel you can't trust international media houses yet you seem to believe any other link from far less credible sources....especially when they suit a particular narrative All these news outlets are similar ideologically, thus have similar biases. As I said before, they mostly lie through omission and emphasis, and giving opinions disguised as facts, so you having a similar ideology may not recognize it. I try to evaluate all sources objectively. Here's an example: http://blogs.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/timblair/index.php/dailytelegraph/comments/marathon_motive_mystery/ OK, probably not entirely fair as some of the reporting was very early. We don't want it. 4-5 viable parties would be enough.

Don't you mean + Taqiyya ?

Behold the consequences of 3 decades spent telling the voters that they can't trust media organizations! (And, you know, the internet killing the economic viability of local investigative reporting.) Well, you can't, it's just a fact. You can still find everything you need on the internet, like the voting record, you don't need investigative reporting for that. I'm not claiming he did anything underhanded that needed to be investigated, but most people don't even bother to check how their Congressman actually votes.

We tried to defeat my Congressman in the primary. 47% of the votes were against him, which is tremendous against a powerful incumbent. He probably did the worst of any Congressman in Texas who were challenged, but 47% is still not enough to beat him. He probably had 50 times more money than the nearest challenger and ran saturation commercials, so he could lie with impunity since no one had the resources to effectively rebut him. Most voters just don't bother to find out information for themselves and make the right decision, so what can you do about it?

Made sense to me, why should he be so powerful by himself? It's just to take the sweet, sweet revenge. I mean you're a Jedi, and what is he?

We have now achieved singularity, where the Onion has merged with reality. As I keep saying, nothing can be done until the laws are changed to get rid of the two party system. A third party will never be viable unless it can replace one of the two major parties. Suppose Bloomberg ran like he was thinking of doing. He'd probably get a good chunk of votes, but all it would accomplish is ensure that Hilzilla, who he just endorsed, and would infinitely prefer to Trump, lost. Disclaimer: I'm actually pretty happy the way the election is going so far.

I was talking about her other law breaking, not just the unethical behavior on display here. And actually certain things are illegal in politics, I'm not an expert in that law. For example if you take donations in support of party activities, but in fact use it for a specific candidate, that could be fraud and could be against election law, not sure. David Burge ‏@iowahawkblog Jul 25 If this election doesn't convince voters why government ought to be small, then we're doomed.

It becomes the government's job when the politician breaks the law, like Hilzilla. But the press is certainly not doing their jobs either, unless you accept that their job is to be Democrat party operatives, in which case they're doing great.

It was the only real boss battle in the game. It just felt so weirdly out of place. Unless I missed something earlier, there was no significance to that boss battle. It's like they just added it because every game apparently needs to pit you against a giant alien creature before the end of the game. At least the previous semi-boss battle just prior to that made sense from a story perspective. That one was sort of like "wait, why am I fighting a giant creature that there's been no mention of in the lore?" Niesha said there must be some really bad mutations at the pole when you first get there, but may be it depends on which companions you have. There are giant mutations throughout, so why is this one out of place? Also you fight a similar boss in the Mars game.

In Soviet US, the government selects the voters.

Less immigration = more assimilation.

When our own government refuses to keep our politicians honest, we have to outsource it to the Russians. Foreigners - doing the jobs Americans won't do.