Wrath of Dagon

Time for the retirement home grandma: http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/09/05/hillary-clinton-serious-coughing-fit-in-cleveland/

That's because he wasn't voiced. But in the new game he is voiced, and by the same guy who voiced Garret in the first three Thief games. So I was going to play as Emily for the new powers, but it turns out I'll have to play as Corvo again. Unfortunately I almost never replay games. In Dishonored the books were pretty short and interesting.

No because I'm sure you know how to google.

" Waaaaaaaaaaaaaa....the media is being unfair ....waaaaaaaaaaaaa " Volo blaming the media is like getting angry at Bioware for betraying gamers because they became more inclusive True enough. You can't fault a compass for pointing north. The media is mostly biased towards liberals. It's just how it is. You can find plenty of media of varying degrees of popularity and quality that slant right. You can tilt at windmills all day. The Wall Street Journal. U.S. News and World Report. Investor's Business Daily. Fox News. NewsMax. Breitbart. WorldNetDaily. The New York Post. The Washington Times. Etc.,.. Many people nowadays tend to get their news from sources they are already pre-disposed to agree with anyway. Check this one out, tell me what you think. I've been reading/watching for a month now. So far I haven't found a bit of bias, It's pretty straight forward & factual: http://www.oann.com/ Its not bad, it neglects certain facts like the fact the FBI found all or most of the deleted emails. We discussed this before, data recovery software works well in cases like this https://www.yahoo.com/news/fbi-finds-deleted-clinton-emails-112714810.html?ref=gs That story is old and inaccurate. She used Bleachbit, which makes the data impossible to recover. Try not to use year old stories as evidence. They get stale real fast. Edit: "The Hill" also seems fairly unbiased, although it's also a matter of which stories get coverage at all. When I read Breitbart, it's less that I like the conservative bias, it's that they cover the stories that interest me, which no one else covers.

It was true then and is true now. Hilzilla just has to finish the job now.

"I will not accept if nominated and will not serve if elected."

They were constantly revived when I started playing HR, to the point that I said the hell with the non-lethal approach.

Meh, I've thought of that back when I was playing Cyanide's Game of Thrones. As far as Hilzilla, at least I don't call her Hitlery or Hilderbeast. And anyone who doesn't think she's Godzilla-like has obviously never seen her in a rage. They didn't call her "Hurricane Hillary" for nothing. Actually Hilzilla originated in 2008 before the primaries, when everyone expected her to crush Obola. So the joke was "Hilzilla vs Obambi"

The future of America: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/columnists/kass/ct-chicago-violence-kass-0831-20160830-column.html In other news, Hilzilla is looking worse than ever.

Meh, if Rubio was a man of principle, all would be forgiven. Unfortunately he turned out to be just another corporatist traitor.

And I never lost one minute of sleepin' Worryin' 'bout the way things might have been http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/439453/marco-rubios-fatal-contradiction

A lot of these allegations come from Ronald Kessler, I know no reason why he wouldn't be credible. Here's an example of a supposedly neutral fact checker driving his own agenda: http://counterjihad.com/huma-abedin-the-muslim-brotherhood-whats-the-truth Edit: Heh, just noticed they have the same last name. I didn't mean to imply the two things are in any way related.

I agree, volo expects people to treat Trump with manners and not be critical I think volo thinks Trump is just some normal well meaning politician but I dont mean to target volo but he reminds me of many of Trumps supporters. They have this almost incomprehensible view Trump is a good guy who treats people well and knows how to " fix " the USA ? Just like you expect them to not be critical of Clinton. She is every bit as nasty and uncivil as Trump. Really? Did Trump ever throw a bible at the head of a Secret Service agent who was sworn to protect him with his life? Did he ever start yelling obscenities at an agent just because the guy said "good morning"? Hillzilla is a hundred times more uncivil, nasty and vindictive than Trump ever was.

Uh, the naked statue of Trump in Central Park? And you have to consider the source here. Is it an accurate comparison if weHave a naked statue of a man, Trump in this case but the statue is just him naked. Its an artist impression.....it means nothing Juxtapose Hilary and Monica with some stupid caption. But Monica had an affair with the husband of Hilary and she was humiliated when it all came out....imagine how Hilary felt? One insult is real and caused real life pain ....and one isn't. How can they be the same? Bruce, i don't know how to tell you this, but Hillary will never love you. Ever. But may be she'll send him a sexy picture of herself if he tries hard enough. Hilzilla was the enabler btw.

Uh, the naked statue of Trump in Central Park? And you have to consider the source here.

It felt to me like they were trying to force me into one of pre-determined paths, very Ubisoft like, instead of letting me find my own solution, like a game of that type should. Also it felt like I was constantly sneaking around offices, reading e-mails. I do that at work, well, minus the sneaking. If I never see another office in a game again it'll be too soon.

Has anyone found DX:HR boring but is having more fun with DX:MD?

Funny how that works. Because right now somewhere around 11% of all wealth in the US is in the hands of just .01% of citizens (.00025% hoarding a bit over 3%). And many of the ones who have the most are still bitching it's not enough. And by the way, the flat tax is the most regressive option out there. A flat federal income tax would later combine with state/municipal taxes for an extremely uneven distribution of tax/earning ratios, punishing the poor(est) the most. You like this idea, why exactly? Not necessarily, most flat tax proposals include the exclusion of significant amount of income at the bottom, so the poor still wouldn't pay any income tax. Right now Mitt Romney only pays 12%, what's fair about that? Having said that a completely flat tax is not the best fit for US at this point. The key is getting rid of all deductions and exemptions, and taxing every kind of income at the same rate. Then there still could be 2-3 different tax brackets. This would produce a much more efficient tax system and increase economic growth.

If your party can't put forward a decent candidate, they don't deserve your loyalty. Our vote is our most powerful tool in enacting change. If we vote for the same party every time regardless of their actions, we are giving up our power. They may not deserve my loyalty but the other party will screw me a lot more. If you want change, you got to work to add run-offs to our elections. Even if one party collapses and is replaced by two or more parties, eventually it'll consolidate into the same corrupt two party (or may be one party) system, if election laws aren't changed.

It's because when you vote for a third party candidate you hurt the major party you're most closely aligned to, thus helping the other major party.

I'm not GD, but it's a situation where you have to keep the bigger picture in mind, like how likely is the candidate to actually damage the country. Trump may be the off the cuff talking buffoon with all the social grace of a British soccer hooligan from the 80's, but as mentioned previously in this thread, odds are he'll be mired down in opposition from both factions. Clinton on the other hand is devious, lying and manipulative enough to actually get active damage done over a 4 year period compared to "just" 4 years of the US being in a state of limbo. Very true. Since Trump is hated by the establishment of both parties, he'll be impeached if he steps out of bounds. The only way Democrats will ever vote for Hilzilla's removal would be if she murders someone on live TV, and I'm not even sure about that. And once she appoints the Supreme Court justice, her power will be all but absolute.

Wikileaks violates privacy: http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2016/08/23/innocent-lives-exposed-in-wikileaks-crusade-against-big-government.html Obviously the reason AP is suddenly interested in this is because Wikileaks has started to publish anti-Hilzilla info.

I don't buy AAA games at all, unless it's something unusual, like Dishonored, which is probably more of an A.

Okay, the idea of a Daily Mail investigation cracked me up I know of no reason why Kessler wouldn't be credible. He's been covering these subjects for a long time and he's the one who uncovered the Cartagena Secret Service scandal.

We should vote for Hillary because she's a warm and caring person: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3753013/Missing-FBI-files-linking-Hillary-Clinton-suicide-White-House-counsel-Vince-Foster-vanished-National-Archives.html