Wrath of Dagon

Most likely, yes. But that doesn't give you or anyone else the right to tell people what they can or cannot think. Do you get it yet? No, I don't.

I think maybe you're reading too much into the long-term consequences of the marine situation. There are a bunch of marines guarding the embassy. If you shoot at them, they'll shoot at you. From what I understand, you have a reputation with each faction. If you kill the marine guarding the embassy, you'll be on the marines' crap list from then on.

And anyone who thinks about killing children in his mind is one sick pervert.

As I recall, they didn't even announce when the game became available in stores.

Yes please, I'd love to be put on trial for disobeying orders and committing atrocities. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0092783/quotes See second quote (bad language)

Well I agree the first 1/3 of Cthulhu where you just sneak around and run away was the best and most inventive part, but I think that would've gotten tedious if extended to the entire game. The rest of the game was excellent also, and still quite inventive.

What's Indigo Prophecy syndrome?

Do you even know what you're talking about, or do you just make random statements out of your ass? As far as Cthulhu development, I think the game was supposed to be much bigger initially, with several detectives available as playable characters, so it was just a case of an inexperienced developer biting off too much. Still a work of art though, too bad it sold so poorly.

First, Cthulhu is a fantastic game. Second, Bethesda had nothing to do with developing it, it was all Headfirst, and all the delays were their fault as well. Bethesda did do a really crummy job of marketing the game, as in no marketing at all. Probably just a sexier box cover would've doubled the sales.

I think it's quite obvious LA and Bioware want to force KOTOR fans into paying monthly subscriptions for the MMO, so no K3. They said themselves the MMO replaces K3.

Isn't that what King's Bounty is supposed to be?

Well, I certainly hope there are William Kristol choices in the game, not just **** ones.

When you blow up a town, that's abstracted violence, quite different in depiction from immediate violence.

I think third person works OK in RPG's, I can't stand it in shooters though. It would be nice if there was a choice of camera selection.

Gears of War? Duh. What I mean is, will we actually use it? No one used the cover system in Mass Effect. What do you mean? You won't last 5 sec in ME without cover, unless may be it's on easy.

His accusation is not entirely without merit. When IGN put together a video of all the stuff you could do in GTA 4 they were quickly pressured to pull it to avoid controversy and giving ammunition to critics.

Vince has very high standards.

Vince is going to review it for NMA.

Yes, talk about the pot calling the kettle black.

IGN seems to be confused. Their info is the same as the main TOR page, but distorted through ignorance.

Sounds like the epitome of Ubisoft game design.

I think their excuse was they'd have to give you the whole game to be able to do a demo, since it's all one open world. Although I suppose they could've demoed the Vault part.

ROFL As far as factions, I don't think they have anything to do with grinding, I think how you approach the mission is what will affect your reputation. The example they gave is if you kill the Marine guard guarding the embassy to get in, you will be on the Marines' crap list, and they will fight you once you get inside, otherwise they help you. In another example, if you don't kill the arms dealer, you probably lose rep with whoever gave you the assignment.

My biggest nightmare: Every planet in TOR is an Uncharted World.

I always thought grinding meant doing stuff to gain XP instead of doing it because it was fun. Lots of repetitive combat would be an example of grinding.