Skarpen

It's easy to support peaceful protests when protesters are not peacefully protesting near your home:

Well the first picture have soldiers of a country that created internment camps for minorities during WW2 and the second one have a guy that killed Hitler.

@Gromnir @Zoraptor Don't know what you guys will read from that, but my military friends told me back then when they prepared for Iraq that superiors told them openly to not be afraid of any WMD because americans informed them the talk about WMD is just for show to justify intervention.

The whole "explanation" is based on omission of the core libertarian rule which is my freedom ends where someones else freedom begins. Utter waste of my time reading this, thanks man...

After 20 years one of the best games ever created gets a surprise update https://www.team17.com/worms-armageddon-content-packed-new-update/worms/

Well no wonder the media are trying to spin the narrative that Biden is not supporting the defund police notion. When any sane person sees that he does. Trump is already gaining support from the blue heroes: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.foxnews.com/politics/national-association-police-organizations-endorses-trump-reelection-after-backing-biden.amp

Umm, so there is a second video of black on white violence and was treated the same as this one. Ok, I might have missed that one, but it only shows a pattern with this kind of videos.

Funnily enough this is the first video of black person violation a white person AND the first time I see you or anyone asking for context, source, proof etc. Makes you wonder...why this video is treated differently? Well by that logic shouldn't white on black/hispanic/asian/etc. violence be the overall biggest then? Just looking for consistency here.

BLM is a Schrödinger organization everyone is or isn't a member depending on if you look at their behaviour.

Twitter is using such words like "blacklist"? Disgusting. I've seen some people noticing those options in recent hack scandal. It confirms what people noticed from some time now. Twitter is shadowbanning and manually alter trends and searches.

@Gromnir Well I, on the other hand, am shocked you are puzzled that someone is calling you out when you defend sexism.

You know this is considered racist statement nowadays?

@Gromnir why do you think sexism is ok when a person targeted is someone you don't agree with? It's never ok.

Did you went to Gromnir school of misreading things? I didn't defend anyone I criticized two punks who provoke people to get views. How is this sexist behaviour allowed? Where are the moderators?

How is walking around provoking people excellent. It's just rude.

Stop violating people with your closed minded, bigoted mathematics. https://babylonbee.com/news/2-2-4-insists-close-minded-bigot

Recently in an interview by CBS I think Trump stated that more white people get shot by police than black. And while media agreed it's factual true they claimed that Trump was wrong regardless. So factchecking Trump rules are: 1. Trump is always wrong 2. If Trump is right, see p.1

@Gromnir Thank you for providing confirmation of my words. I gladly accept your recognition of being wrong.

Wrong. Again you are confusing the 1998 Act with what was added in the 2018 amendment. The defamation of Poland (i.e. claiming Poland was responsible for Germany or Russia war crimes) wasn't part of the act until 2018 amendment and up to 3 years (it's actually a fine or up to 3 years, you got that wrong also) is for denial of Germany and Russia war crimes and such. You need to get better sources or actually read up a little. The world doesn't revolve around US and US laws are not the law in the world. I already stated what I meant, so given that please forgive if I ignore your claim to know better.

This is false as the passed law categorized it as civil offense not criminal. And I see as always Gromnir knows better what someone had in mind than that person. Amusing as always.

You missed the word "falsely" for once and I see you are talking about the amendment to the act rather then the act itself. The amendment only gives the appropriate institutions tools to prosecute people who defame Poland. I assume even with all the free speech in US there are defamation laws, yes? Maybe I wasn't clear. My intention wasn't to say "if you are from country x you cannot contribute to discussion about y". What I meant was: arguing that your country methods are better than methods in other country while the results are not in favor of your country is not very convincing.