Llyranor

BTW, try going through the Jaegermeister 'advanced tutorial' as the commies. Hehe, steep learning curve indeed.

Why are you even randomly attacking houses? And yeah, I still had to give orders, so I'm not sure when exactly the battle will end.

Did you watch round 15 yet?

Guffaw

Hehehhahehahehahehaheahehaea

http://shadowstrider.youaremighty.com

Time is running out!

Sins of a Solar Empire is a 'RT4X' game, a mix between - I guess, MOO and Homeworld. The game engine basically supports a mega-zoom feature (liken it to SupCom, perhaps) that allows you to expand anywhere from whole star systems and just zoom into individual battles around planetary bodies. So, essentially, eventually happens in one big freaking map. Basically, it's a RTS where combat (full 3d, of course - no 2d plane crap) revolves around planets or other bodies (all with gravity wells taken into account - get close to the planet if you want to start bombarding, but get too close, and it's going to take you a while to escape if you get ambushed), but also features other '4X' elements. o All this happens in real-time, and the game supposedly boasts a rigid AI that eliminates the need for micromanagement, but allows it should the player find the time. You basically may have to manage multiple battles across different star systems all while managing your empire, while the AI helps up with automation - leaving you to micro what you think is most important. In theory, it sounds like it has lots of potential. The scope is a major appeal. The website, of course, has more detail. The trailer just went up. http://www.sinsofasolarempire.com/trailers.html

Hmm, 3 monitors along with this http://www.naturalpoint.com/trackir/ would be very cool.

Hehehe. The fun's just starting. Or is it ending? DUN DUN DUN

I hope you invested in tombstones. ... for your guys, I mean.

Thanks for understanding, guys!

Malkavian or nothing, dawg.

Currently listening to this http://www.yogabba.com/keeptrying.mp3

Not that I dress like a prepubescent female. I mean, I'm just saying.

Why are people so adamant about calling their lifestyle some specific "lolita" lifestyle? I find that to be a paradox because you live your own lifestyle, not that of someone else's. You may take aspects of the fantasy surrounding the lolita fashion into your everyday doings, and may aspire to behave in a way you're intrigued by, but in doing so you are making it your life. If you aim to behave and indulge in things that feel uncomfortable just because you feel it's necessary to do so in order to 'live like a lolita', then that is not life, that's pretence. So why is it so difficult to just say, I am living like me? If the lolita 'subculture' compels you more than any other, and you feel comfortable doing the things 'a lolita' would do, then you aren't living some lolita lifestyle, you are living your own, which in turn is "one lolita's lifestyle", i.e. yours. We all make our own interpretation on things and we all carry that out differently. People who cry about others not understanding the meaning of a lolita lifestyle do not understand that everyone has their own concept of what it means, even those who claim to live by it. The whole argument is pointless and I wish people would just get over it and do the things they like, "lolita-like" or not.

Isn't that the mod where one of the modders committed suicide?

Or worse, your affiliation with stuff like this! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OiaaeIbS_Ko

...... Look what you've done, alanschu.

It doesn't matter, because PS3 will be the trigger that ignites flat-panel TV sales.

http://www.gamespot.com/news/6152586.html YAY!

Quick, let's divert this thread into a hilarious Bush-monkey comparison before the serious rational discussion ensues!

The countdown for FUN!

irony x 2!

ROFL