Epiphany

...

In what respect? He did a lot, need to know what you're wanting to know. I don't know whether to laugh cause you're joking, or be scared because you're this stupid.

I dunno, I don't play the rulebook stuff. What I can tell you is the enemy difficulty (even though lacking completely) scales with your characters. So lvl 50 or lvl 20, still takes roughly the same 2 seconds to kill an enemy.

you're obviously too clueless on the subject to continue discussing the issue bye

Again, when you see episode three, and how palpatine fights yoda in a light saber duel, you'll eat those words.

No, he said it was fitting, given Fables narrative quality. There was nothing to listen to, because I never said Fable's ending didn't fit the game. I merely said it wasn't cinematic in nature. That, sadly, is the part that you can't seem to understand. Various people have different views on what is cinematic and what isn't. You seem to think that only your view is correct, and that there are no other possible opinions no the matter. I could just go on and on repeating "most gamers consider cinematic endings to be those of high production quality, such as Final Fantasy, Ninja Gaiden, etc...", but it's something you choose to ignore. You used to be open minded back on those old green Baldur's Gate forums... what happened?

How can it be better? Force adept don't even use force powers against you like they did in KOTOR... You never have to worry about mind attacks, force storms or drain life (cept from 2 characters which is some cheap "auto" attack, and not really a skill attack). The AI is dumber...

k

Yes twice, and from what I've heard, one line.

It's apparently over your head then. Let's break it down for you.... You said: "surely nothing Gromnir said indicated that text on black screen = cinematic." I said, before you said that: "You APPEARED to be claiming anything that's not text/black screen is cinematic." So, I went in and bolded the "not", in order to point out that your inital "surely nothing...blah blah" was already addressed. The rest of your post, I ignored, since it's a waste of time to address things with someone that only sees either a little bit, or what they want to see. toodles

Palpatine is useless. What kinda sith lord gets pick up by his own apprentice and thrown off a cliff? Pathetic! And his Lighting sucks. He fried Luke for two minutes, and luke still didn't die! Bah! <{POST_SNAPBACK}> lol You will be so eating this comment when you see his use of lightning in episode 3... Gonna bookmark this page and hope you're still here when it's released.

Bolded word is response to the italics line.

If you found this game even remotely hard, then you're apparently missing a key element to combat. It's very easy, because the enemy AI is worse than in KOTOR. Soloing hard difficulty is a snap.

You - the others are just pawns. The game is so easy you can solo everywhere. But, hell bent on a team... HK-47 and Visas/Mandalore would be fun....... I guess

Yes, you continue to recieve your normal feat/attribute progression.

She's the easiest to influence. All you have to do is create echos and listen to her teaches. You can't influence characters, they more or less influence you. You have to bend around their personality. No Dunno about the part, but... 1 on Peragus, 1 on Telos and 2 on Nar Shadda Yes Darth Sion = boss Disciple - play female Hanharr - play evil Hanharr replaces Mira, Disciple replaces Handmaiden. No new slots appear. It's implied that evil - goto wins and good - the remote wins. But the whole ending sequence is abrupt, so who really knows for sure.

In response to this: "people has some strange notions of what is and is not cinematic... 'especially if their other option is "text."", Ace. It was an example that even text over an image wouldn't be cinematic. You APPEARED to be claiming anything that's not text/black screen is cinematic. My notions on Fable aren't twisted, as I've played through it several times. Bye.

ok

Methinks some people are having faulty nostalgic memories about KOTOR. It was a good game, but 'insulting it's legend' implies that it has one, which it never did. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Tell that to the press, the people that made it legendary.

When the **** did I say Fable had text over a black screen? That's *YOUR* definition of a non-cinematic ending. For most gamers narration over a mural is NOT a cinematic ending... Forget it, trying to discuss anything with you is apparently as rewarding as stabbing your eyes with a plastic spoon. You have your close-minded ideals of what cinematic endings are, and you refuse to acknowledge the existance of other opinions on the matter.

Well isn't that incredible...

Because it's not a movie, it's a game? Again, there's really nothing to debate here, I just wanted to point out that you seem to be blurring the line on the whole issue by stating that nearly everything is cinematic. That's not necessarily the case when it comes to video games, for the majority of gamers. You can twist it anyway you want, and make a valid argument for every style of ending being trash or cinematic, it's a personal preference per gamer. But I'm sure, if polled as a whole, that the vast majority of gamers would classify cinematic endings like those found in final fantasy games, or even Baldur's Gate. (I'm not sure what you've played so I gave few examples, but I'm just assuming you've played BG, and at least have seen a FF cinematic from the PS1 till now) Endings like those of this game that are unresolving, unfulfilling, and have a plain lazy feel to them, would by most gamers standards not fall into a "cinematic" catagory. REGARDLESS of the fact there is a very short, pointless cinematic at the very end before credits roll. You have different tastes, and seem to view cinematic endings in a different way. You apparently relate quality in a different term, where most gamers would relate the term quality to "cinematic".

If you have scrolling text over a still image that's not necessarily cinematic for a video game. You're trying to pick apart the entire concept of it by twisting the reality of quality versus crap. Gamers tend to relate cinematic endings with the production quality, or at the very least, the fulfilling nature of the ending. Games aren't movies, all of the same rules do not apply.

Who's to say a character like Han Solo wouldn't be level 60?

Didn't know you could do that. Go with Epiphany's idea instead it sounds better. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> LOL, not sure about that, Ep arnt you the same person that killed all thew exchange guards and smashed the concil there as well and cant gain access into the exchange now? LOL! Think before you smash! <{POST_SNAPBACK}> No.