Lord Wafflebum Posted December 18, 2014 Share Posted December 18, 2014 Ok, so in order for this to actually fit the definition of codependency, we need to worry about OE's finances and OE needs us to be concerned about their finances. OE doesn't care and frankly does not want us to worry about their finances otherwise they would publish their budgets for us. At most, some individuals might have a mild obsessive disorder, but nothing has been posted that comes even remotely close to that- except for a particular individual obsessively posting in multiple threads that we all have a codependency disorder. Seriously man, I've become a bit concerned at this point. If you're trolling then you troll on brother, but if this is actually causing you distress I very strongly encourage you to talk to someone about it. This isn't healthy unless you're intentionally being difficult. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheikh Posted December 18, 2014 Share Posted December 18, 2014 No because I am not worried about your worries. Then we're not worried about Obsidian, either. Po-tay-toh, po-tah-toh. Yeah you are because i can explain why I am debating your worries but you can not explain why you care about obsidians finances (the only explanations you have had are codependent ones). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheikh Posted December 18, 2014 Share Posted December 18, 2014 (edited) Off-topic curiosity: Isn't a troll codependent on codependency? I've been thinking this ever since Sheikh started. I don't think he's a troll though, just someone with different and strong viewpoints . Still, I do wonder whether he's not a little bit codependent on his fellow debaters. And we wouldn't want to that now, would we? Explain how and we will see because I dont see how at the moment. I dont have to/need to come and debate here and I know that and neither do you have to respond to me at all on this forum and I know that also and I dont expect you to, I dont care if you dont because if I did, that would be passively forcing you to. Thats what all codependency is - passively forcing, and I am a very big fan of personal freedom and individuality and the libertarian ideology so I wouldnt want to do that at all. Matter of fact you have people like Osvir who are so into me that they get real angry at me through PM, say they are done, quit responding and say they have ignored me and then continue to both respond to my posts later on and send me new PMs. Fascinating. He is codependent though, I think. But he is also from the extremely socialist sweden where the government does some hardcore brainwashing. Government as such always by definition has a codependent relationship with its people and thats why we need to cut all government down with a battleaxe. Since its inherently codependent, everyone will be weakened and nothing will ever work out in the end. You see if you are all so into me, I dont even need to worry about people not responding to me or otherwise ignoring me. So there isnt even any need for codependency. I dont need to prove myself to "survive". The weak ones tend to, but they just dont realize that just because they are weak does not mean codependency is useful to them. They just tend to not know as well so they are tempted to enter that trap. Thats what I am here to just help you realize, if you want to accept my advice. Edited December 18, 2014 by Sheikh 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lephys Posted December 18, 2014 Share Posted December 18, 2014 Thats what all codependency is - passively forcing, and I am a very big fan of personal freedom and individuality and the libertarian ideology so I wouldnt want to do that at all. Then why do you take such issue with people freely discussing what they choose to voluntarily discuss? Your coming in here and lecturing everyone about being codependent doesn't even have anything to do with any of the topics being discussed in here, because no one even claimed that this completely optional discussion must take place. It just seems like you're justifying incessant lectures about things with the condition "someone has said or done something I wouldn't do or say." You adamantly tell people how pointless a thread is, or how wrong they're doing it, then turn around and say "Oh, I'm not worried about your discussion at all. I love personal freedom." What gives, man? 2 Should we not start with some Ipelagos, or at least some Greater Ipelagos, before tackling a named Arch Ipelago? 6_u Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nakia Posted December 18, 2014 Share Posted December 18, 2014 The topic of thread is "Your;re Lucky" Here is the OP Witcher 3: Wild Hunt delayed until May Feargus Urquhart jumps for joy in his office. A purely innocent, casual report of something. There is the possibility that Obsidian might benefit from the delays mentioned . I hope they do benefit but I am not worried about it. This is also a purely innocent, casual remark and needs no explanation from me although I have in previous posts explained why I would like Obsidian to have good sales. I fail to see why anyone would take offense at the OP's comment or at my comment? I fail to understand why anyone would read into either comment some deep, emotional problem. I fail to understand what is wrong about wishing someone good luck. 2 I have but one enemy: myself - Drow saying Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheikh Posted December 18, 2014 Share Posted December 18, 2014 (edited) Then why do you take such issue with people freely discussing what they choose to voluntarily discuss? Try rereading this sentence and see if it makes any sense to you. It doesnt to me. I have not "taken any issue" with anyone, not sure what "taking an issue" even means. My opinion about this is that you were still trying to justify your codependent views. With this sentence you were coming from a codependent viewpoint and arriving at a braindead and meaningless sentence because you dont have anything to say. There is no way you can even try to justify codependency. Its just empty. It just seems like you're justifying incessant lectures about things with the condition I have never justified my lectures because I dont feel I need to justify my lectures. I can just come right in here and give them exactly as I please, which is what I am doing because I can give - you dont have to read. How do you justify reading them and becoming upset even though you didnt have to read any of them? Protip: You only need to justify anything if you are being codependent. In other words, you dont have to justify that either. What gives, man? Your codependent glasses. Justifying anything is a thoroughly codependent thing regardless of context because somebody always came up with that justice in some way or another and justifiyng means you are being codependent with him. Edited December 18, 2014 by Sheikh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yellow Rabbit Posted December 18, 2014 Share Posted December 18, 2014 Sheikh, you're taking casual concern and good wishes toward favourite game-maker to the extent of mental dependency and stubbornly repeating that it was there from the start. It was not. Stop. "Only Siths deal in absolutes" © OWK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LadyCrimson Posted December 18, 2014 Share Posted December 18, 2014 Hm. A little too much circular pop psychology and not enough on-topic. Feel free to discuss how other game releases may help/hinder PoE sales in a fresh thread if you wish, but I think this one is finished for now. 8 “Things are as they are. Looking out into the universe at night, we make no comparisons between right and wrong stars, nor between well and badly arranged constellations.” – Alan Watts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts