Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
They act like if there's greater inclusiveness for gays then the whole game is going to be about gay sex.

 

Real life paladins say these, LOL.

 

Enjoy the game people.

Ka-ka-ka-ka-Cocaine!


Z9SVsCY.gif

Posted

I'm just glad the high tier backers ($1000.00+) are getting their own private forum on the Obsidian forums.

 

There's only a total of 116 backers in that tier. If that's true, it's going to be an incredibly quiet forum.

As I understand, it's primarily for talking about the items they're helping to design. Not a high roller's suite.

 

But that's just the impression I got from the one comment I read. Don't take that as me knowing what I'm talking about.

"Show me a man who "plays fair" and I'll show you a very talented cheater."
Posted
They act like if there's greater inclusiveness for gays then the whole game is going to be about gay sex.

 

Real life paladins say these, LOL.

 

Enjoy the game people.

 

Actually, I'm more annoyed at the people who create false dilemmas. They act like if giving greater representation for one overlooked or oppressed group somehow denigrates another overlooked or oppressed group. They don't seem to understand that it's not an either or situation, or that different groups face different problems and often times, one group faces problems in addition to the problems of another group. For example, the Han Chinese are oppressed by the Communist government but Tibetans in China not only suffer the oppression endured by the average Han Chinese, they suffer additional oppression forced upon them because they are Tibetan. Irish Catholics were oppressed but gay Irish Catholics suffered both the stigma of being Irish Catholic and the stigma of being gay.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...