September 28, 201213 yr Do we know anything about how PE will handle levels and experience? I hope nothing is set in stone yet, because I'd like to give my feedback, the same I gave to Wasteland 2 guys. I think the best experience system is the one games like Vampire Bloodlines, Deus Ex and Dark Messiah of M&M have. It encourages all the good stuff like completing quests, finding alternate routes, finding out secrets and so on. There's no reward for killing lots of trashy mobs. Since there's a finite amount of exp to gain, it makes the game easier to balance for developers. Exp systems such as in Fallout are much more exploit-friendly, while, for example, systems such as in Arcanum (exp per hit etc) were totally dumb. tl;dr single digit experience points for doing meaningful stuff, not for killing rats. Easier to manage both for devs and players, harder to exploit.
September 28, 201213 yr Of course you could also just choose not to have trash mobs. I'd be surprised if even Obsidian knows such specifics at this point. JoshSawyer: Listening to feedback from the fans has helped us realize that people can be pretty polarized on what they want, even among a group of people ostensibly united by a love of the same games. For us, that means prioritizing options is important. If people don’t like a certain aspect of how skill checks are presented or how combat works, we should give them the ability to turn that off, resources permitting. . .
September 28, 201213 yr Define meaningful stuff - completing quests, slaying epic monsters, completing challenges? Say no to popamole!
September 28, 201213 yr Author Define meaningful stuff - completing quests, slaying epic monsters, completing challenges? Yes, finding alternate routes to places, successfuly using your skills to overcome various obstacles etc.
September 28, 201213 yr I don't think that tl;dr stuff is necessary here. Check the age poll. Very few posters are teenagers and PS:T was the most popular game. I think the vast majority here are at least readers. JoshSawyer: Listening to feedback from the fans has helped us realize that people can be pretty polarized on what they want, even among a group of people ostensibly united by a love of the same games. For us, that means prioritizing options is important. If people don’t like a certain aspect of how skill checks are presented or how combat works, we should give them the ability to turn that off, resources permitting. . .
September 28, 201213 yr Author I don't think that tl;dr stuff is necessary here. Check the age poll. Very few posters are teenagers and PS:T was the most popular game. I think the vast majority here are at least readers. I don't have faith in people.
September 28, 201213 yr I agree with the op. Tim Cain, in his update, hinted that xp would be given to the players for reaching his goals rather than for killing things, and I hope Obsidian will choose that system for the game.
September 28, 201213 yr Author Adding to this (and bumping in the process) I'd really like, though this is my personal preference, if XP gained and numbers in general were kept to low digits, maybe even single digit. Bloodlines had you gaining 2 or 3 exp points per objective for the most of the game and it worked really well because of how the character system works. Meanwhile games in which to gain another level require me to gain GORILLIONS of exp points remind of MMOs and their audience, kids that want to see huge numbers.
September 28, 201213 yr Whether the numbers are big or not mostly depends on the system. In Bloodlines you increased your attributes, including base stats, at each level up. In D&D esque systems your base stats never change and most of your derived stats automatically increase with you only putting points directly into skills/feats. Low XP systems won't work in such a system, and my wild guess is that Eternity's new system is going to be like the latter.
September 28, 201213 yr Of course you could also just choose not to have trash mobs. I'd be surprised if even Obsidian knows such specifics at this point. It's RTWP. It's gonna have trash mobs. Anyway, I agree with OP. Having the majority of exp coming from combat not only encourages grinding, but more importantly, limits players that want to avoid combat. Plus, this system doesn't prevent there from being exp rewards for very challenging fights, and it also encourages players to explore and do quests.
September 28, 201213 yr There is already a thread discussing this: http://forums.obsidi...e-observations/ Is another thread necessary? You should at least look there to get a feel for the community's opinion. There's additional information from a developer who discussed it on the Kickstarter Discussion area as well. Edited September 28, 201213 yr by SqueakyCat
September 28, 201213 yr I would prefer Goal-Based Experience, and a level-less system where you spend experience on advances, rather than to arbitrarily "level up" and gain a bunch of stuff, especially hitpoints (if hitpoints were to be relatively static throughout the game, I would be very happy).
September 28, 201213 yr Of course you could also just choose not to have trash mobs. I'd be surprised if even Obsidian knows such specifics at this point. I'd so prefer it if they were actually 2-3 months from launch and this Kickstarter stuff was just so the dev team can treat themselves to a truckload of cocaine and call girls.
Create an account or sign in to comment