septembervirgin Posted September 18, 2012 Share Posted September 18, 2012 If a character succeeds, by what margin does that character succeed? I think that success in most CRPG is on a binary rate, except in combat (damage done should be considered a "quality roll"). Contested or opposed checks to a skill or attribute should always be rated for quality. Also, should the effort be gauged by any audience, judged somehow, it should also be rated for quality. If we fail, that might be rated for quality too. A fumble table could be included in a game and is usually entertaining but I've yet to see fumbles incorporated into a computer role-playing game although I'd like to see it (with the occurrence of one tenth of a percent chance but more likely while being hampered by an enemy more capable than oneself or if unlucky trait is possessed or if a certain "feat" or spell is used against ones character). "This is what most people do not understand about Colbert and Silverman. They only mock fictional celebrities, celebrities who destroy their selfhood to unify with the wants of the people, celebrities who are transfixed by the evil hungers of the public. Feed us a Gomorrah built up of luminous dreams, we beg. Here it is, they say, and it looks like your steaming brains." " If you've read Hart's Hope, Neveryona, Infinity Concerto, Tales of the Flat Earth, you've pretty much played Dragon Age." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Troller Posted September 18, 2012 Share Posted September 18, 2012 haha I like the idea, and man, from all the suggestions I see here, if the devs chose to implement lots of them, we will only start playing this rpg in the year 2020 hahaha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nakia Posted September 18, 2012 Share Posted September 18, 2012 Yes, at least in side quests. In the main quest it might not work so well. If you fail a quest or only partial succeed in the MQ then I assume you have to reload and try again. That could be annoying. Side quests could be failed without affecting the over all game. Arcanum had this feature. I have but one enemy: myself - Drow saying Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evdk Posted September 18, 2012 Share Posted September 18, 2012 If you fail a quest or only partial succeed in the MQ then I assume you have to reload and try again. That could be annoying. Why? This need not necessarily lead to reload, just to suboptimal conditions in further parts of the main quest. It may even open unexpected venues for progress or at least side quests. Say no to popamole! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
septembervirgin Posted September 18, 2012 Author Share Posted September 18, 2012 I'm not talking about success and failure of quests but rather in dialogue skill use and in skill checks. "This is what most people do not understand about Colbert and Silverman. They only mock fictional celebrities, celebrities who destroy their selfhood to unify with the wants of the people, celebrities who are transfixed by the evil hungers of the public. Feed us a Gomorrah built up of luminous dreams, we beg. Here it is, they say, and it looks like your steaming brains." " If you've read Hart's Hope, Neveryona, Infinity Concerto, Tales of the Flat Earth, you've pretty much played Dragon Age." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aliksy Posted September 18, 2012 Share Posted September 18, 2012 I'm pretty sure degree of success is pretty common in tabletop games. I vaguely remember some rules in d20 3.x (ew), even. I personally don't like a whole lot of randomness in my games, so I guess it depends on how it's implemented. I don't want to lose because the RNG gods gave me six fumbles in a row and the enemy was gifted six dramatic successes. That goes more into broad system questions and math, and why I like dice pool much much much more than 1d20+stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IrishLuigi Posted September 18, 2012 Share Posted September 18, 2012 Idea's good. I would like to clarify that, in my opinion, t's not absolutely necessary for every single quest to have multiple levels of success/failure (that would be too much time for the devs to spend on each quest), but rather the amount of potential outcomes correlates with the complexity of the quest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now