Walsingham Posted September 2, 2010 Posted September 2, 2010 It seems strange that we should adopt a kneejerk reaction of guilty/not guilty on this forum according to our politics, when in so many other cases like that Dutch serial killer guy a lot of people wanted to wait for the court case. Just because the guy runs a website you like doesn't make him NOT a rapist. Nor the inverse. "It wasn't lies. It was just... bull****"." -Elwood Blues tarna's dead; processing... complete. Disappointed by Universe. RIP Hades/Sand/etc. Here's hoping your next alt has a harp.
kirottu Posted September 2, 2010 Posted September 2, 2010 Just because the guy runs a website you like doesn't make him NOT a rapist. Nor the inverse. If a guy runs a forum then it indeed does make him a rapist... and moderators are those who touch your but in a crowded bus. This post is not to be enjoyed, discussed, or referenced on company time.
Nepenthe Posted September 2, 2010 Posted September 2, 2010 It seems strange that we should adopt a kneejerk reaction of guilty/not guilty on this forum according to our politics, when in so many other cases like that Dutch serial killer guy a lot of people wanted to wait for the court case. Just because the guy runs a website you like doesn't make him NOT a rapist. Nor the inverse. My professional opinion (as an ex-prosecutor) is that the case stinks. Still, just looking into it and actually even deciding to take the case to court are, of course, different things. And it's not like I have anything close to the full info here, but this kind of back-and-forthing doesn't look good, does it? You're a cheery wee bugger, Nep. Have I ever said that? Reapercussions
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now