well it seems that there is quite some evil prospects, to this new system.

 

it requires patience though!

 

[acronym=well, it seems you can write some funky underlying messages this way.. pretty cool if you ask me! you have to be quite attentive when reading posts from now on! ].[/acronym]

Emoticons don't work there. They really don't work there.

Edited January 30, 200719 yr by Nartwak

Sneaky!

I dont get it. Wheres the acronym?

Move your cursor over the underlined word.

Im not trying to be an idjut here but I dont see an underlined word in any of the preceding posts. I do see the microtext dot at the end of Rosbjerq's post but thats nothing new.

Im not trying to be an idjut here but I dont see an underlined word in any of the preceding posts. I do see the microtext dot at the end of Rosbjerq's post but thats nothing new.

 

There is no microtext in that post. All of the words in his post should be underlined, as should "really" in Nartwak's post and the "Sneaky!" post by Krookie.

Im not trying to be an idjut here but I dont see an underlined word in any of the preceding posts. I do see the microtext dot at the end of Rosbjerq's post but thats nothing new.

 

There is no microtext in that post. All of the words in his post should be underlined, as should "really" in Nartwak's post and the "Sneaky!" post by Krookie.

They're not showing up underlined for me, either, but I am getting the pop-up tooltip when hovering my cursor over the proper words. I didn't know what to look for until I used the 'reply' function to peek at Rosbjerg's ML.

I don't think you see the dotted lines in IE but you still get the effect if you let your mouse hover over the words.

 

This is excellent for sending secret messages in order to enact dastardly schemes.

Hidden messages! Oooh sneaky!

Edited January 30, 200719 yr by Krookie

they're not underlined on my screen either.. which is why I thought it was pretty sneaky.. you could write an entire alternative post that way..

they're not underlined on my screen either.. which is why I thought it was pretty sneaky.. you could write an entire alternative post that way..

 

Maybe the lines are only visible in Firefox

 

Here is what I see, while words are obvious punctuation marks are not.

Sorry - but I suspect that this new feature would very quickly become ... misused.