Jump to content

fgalkin

Members
  • Posts

    225
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by fgalkin

  1.  

    Dyrwood is based on the USA. The USA has ridiculous names like "Delaware," "Massachusetts," and "Mississippi." Such silliness! Who would come up with silly names like that?! Why didn't they just call it "Pilgrim Land," or "River Land?"

     

    I do not want a linguistics lesson just by looking at a map! 3/10!

     

    Have a very nice day.

    -fgalkin

     

    Those names have historic roots, based on history, The History, that actually happened, sadly most are named after massacred and extinct Native Americans, not only states but many cities and counties too. I just looked at what Mississippi meant and, surprise, it means "The Father of Waters"

     

    We know Massachusetts, Paris, Berlin, Cairo, Copenhagen, because we live on earth. When someone tells you they live in Copenhagen, you understand perfectly well what they mean.

     

    I do not intend to read the "Collected Volumes on the History of Dyrwood" or keep a "Concise Engwithian Dictionary" with me while I am trying to enjoy a story. 

     

    So, you basically blame the developers for your own laziness and inability to immerse yourself in a story? Somehow, it's their fault for being too thorough in developing a setting? That's....not a very sensible attitude to have? 

     

    Have a very nice day.

    -fgalkin

    • Like 1
  2. 'Cept for the whole pantheon thing, of course, which wasn't around in the Renaissance or the U.S. Or reincarnation.

    Well, yes? But we're talking about culture (and the history that shaped that culture). I mean, I don't think anyone here will dispute that the Valian Republics are based on Renaissance Italy, for example, or that Eír Glanfath is heavily inspired by the Celts? 

     

    Have a very nice day.

    -fgalkin

     

  3. as BG was a horrible game as such. What was great about BG was its amazing art + spell FX. The rest was cringeworthy: Story, Chars and combat were horrible in general. BG2 at least improved upon quest density. 

     

    Also, BG was~15 years ago. If a game made today is NOT better than BG then what's the point of making it?

     

    What made this thread possible? The continuous claims that POE > BG and somehow that being a metric of good games. 

    Discuss your opinions!

    Thing is, the genre basically existed for like 5 years in total, then went bust. There were a few developers still making games, like Spiderweb Software, but for the most part, the genre was dead.

     

    It's like if everybody stopped making muscle cars for 30 years, then they made a Corvette. Of course, people are going to compare it to the classic cars, because that's the last important point of reference that they have.

     

    Have a very nice day.

    -fgalkin

  4. And then you go stab Kolsc in the face in a small shack in the woods in an area you've already been.

     

    The "Side with Raedric"-option seems very uninspiring, and even locks you out of a lot of Raedric's Keep content. It's weird.

     

    And then you go stab Kolsc in the face in a small shack in the woods in an area you've already been.

     

    The "Side with Raedric"-option seems very uninspiring, and even locks you out of a lot of Raedric's Keep content. It's weird.

    Crazy **** lord turns out to be an **** and screws you over? Shock! Horror! 

     

    Have a very nice day.

    -fgalkin

  5.  

     

     

    It's one of the most difficult encounters in the game. Wymund is a high level priest, most certainly higher than your party when you first meet him. He has access to some of the most powerful spells in the game such as pillar of holy fire, which can easily end your party. You have to take care of him first via some sort of crowd control spell or ability, then get rid of his entourage and finally take him out for good.

    Actually I find that the larger factor of his difficulty isn't so much his abilities as the position from which you have to start the battle, with all your squishies upfront asking for a beating.
    You do realize that you can change the order in which your characters start out after transitions by re-arranging the order of their portraits, right? Just put your tanks first, and you're good. 

     

    Have a very nice day.

    -fgalkin

    Maybe you should play the game and this particular battle, before making wise comments?

     

    What about it? You run into the hall, in transition order (that is, in the same formation you do level transitions in), as soon as the door is opened. I don't see how my comment does not apply?

     

    Also, I didn't find the battle that hard, but I've had the Adra Cheese Beetle statuette, and it ate its way through everything.

     

    Have a very nice day.

    -fgalkin

  6.  

    It's one of the most difficult encounters in the game. Wymund is a high level priest, most certainly higher than your party when you first meet him. He has access to some of the most powerful spells in the game such as pillar of holy fire, which can easily end your party. You have to take care of him first via some sort of crowd control spell or ability, then get rid of his entourage and finally take him out for good.

    Actually I find that the larger factor of his difficulty isn't so much his abilities as the position from which you have to start the battle, with all your squishies upfront asking for a beating.

     

    You do realize that you can change the order in which your characters start out after transitions by re-arranging the order of their portraits, right? Just put your tanks first, and you're good. 

     

    Have a very nice day.

    -fgalkin

  7.  

     

    nd why did you do this? For a few perpetually outraged social justice warriors who take umbrage with everything for its own sake and don't even game. The ringleader of which uses the hashtag "#KillAllMen"

    Oh come on, it was just a joke. Why are you being so emotional, dude? 

  8. Is it just be, or did did anyone else notice that Dyrwood is basically a complete set of negative stereotypes about the USA set during the Renaissance? I mean, it has things like "former colony that still fetishizes their revolution centuries ago," "being a global leader in animancy research, while having a massive fear and distrust of same," "freeing the slaves, then keeping them down through racism and economic explotation," "massive religious persecution by out of control populist groups that basically defy and distrust all authority that is not themselves," "have a massive program of domestic surveillance led by Lady J.Edgar Hoover," "ended a war with a magical nuke," "love guns (and Magran)," and, of course, "have a bad relationship with the natives, due to a history of displacing them by wholesale slaughter."

     

    Do you think it was intentional by Obsidian? 

     

    Have a very nice day.

    -fgalkin

    • Like 2
  9.  

     

    To be fair, if you kill someone wearing armor, that armor probably isn't in great shape anymore.

     

    That's not an argument in case there is no item damaging mechanic in the game. Your armor would eventually get damaged too in the real world, but the game does not contain this mechanic. So either way all of the equipment (including yours) would have to be subjected to damage, or none. The latter is the case for this game.

     

    Thank god that never made it in the game. I dont like that in any game elder scrolls or fallout.

     

    A better argument is that unless the enemy is exactly your size and shape, the armor isn't going to fit or provide much protection.

     

     

    Have a very nice day.

    -fgalkin

  10.  

    I see that the online abuse that Brianna Wu received that forced her to leave her house has now got to CNN. Since the argument seems to be that the abuse is equal from both sides how many founders or major contributing members of GG have been forced to leave there homes due to abuse from the anti-GG crowd? Can you guys post the links around this

     

     

    Overreaction.

     

    This threats everyone keeps recieveing are hot air.

     

    Think for a second who is making them? Kids, drunkard and overemotional people with hair-triggers. Most of them don't mean a thing they posted.  Most don't even live anywhere close or have the means to travel half way around the globe just to hurt some stupid person.

    And most of them won't even know where said person lives.

     

    So yeah, you got a bigegr chance to get hit byy a lightining while holding a big metal rod on a roof of a tall building during a thunderstorm than actually come to any real physical harm.

     

     

    Oh, so, school and workplace shootings are not totally a thing anymore? When did that change, and why did no one tell me?

     

    Have a very nice day.

    -fgalkin

  11.  

     In my opinion, Jared Diamond's work in Guns, Germs, and Steel, has sound scholarship.

     

     

    Except it doesn't. It's a work that is very poorly cited, which is at the heart of the problem of the work. He makes assertions with zero evidence or citations, again and again in his book.

     

    If I'd have written a history paper in college, or even high school the way that book is written I'd have gotten a deserved F even if what I wrote was 100% correct. I realize the standards have slipped in the last decade or two (holy **** at what I've seen some AP history teachers let their kids get away with recently), but there's no good reason someone with the credentials and background as Diamond is writing so poorly.

     

    'Guns, Germs, and Steel' appeals to the layman, appeals to some modern theories of genetics, fits a popular dialogue regarding plague, and other often misguided things. Read a bunch of history books on the subject prior to it's publication (as I did once upon a time) that actually do have good scholarship, citations,and much better discussions of the evidence known, and you'll realize that Diamond is grasping at straws much of the time in his work, especially when he's discussing the 'germs' aspect of it.

     

    And no, for the most part, the Europeans were not actively trying to spread disease, that's another myth. Especially smallpox, which is generally believed to be the biggest killer. Doing so could and would very possibly lead to suicide, as the Euros were not exactly immune to it themselves.

     

    And yes, Howard Zinn was a quack historian on par with Diamond. They both are cut from the same ****ty cloth.

     

    Perhaps, someone like Rushton is more of a scholar for you?

     

    Have a very nice day.

    -fgalkin

  12. The genocide label is fairly ridiculous, it implies that Columbus somehow knew that European diseases were going to rip through Native American populations.  

     

    If you really want to go all out on this campaign, you should go after Cortes and Pizarro first.

    In 1494, the population of Hispanola was over 3 million. In 1508, it was 60,000. This was under Columbus' direct governorship. It has gotten so bad that Queen Isabella removed him from power, in part because he would refuse to let the Native Americans to convert so he could keep them enslaved, and also due to repeated complaints of gross mismanagement (which were found true by de Bobadilla). Thus, you cannot say that Columbus was just a man of his time- he wasn't, because even his contemporaries thought that he was horrible. The Bobadilla report confirms it http://www.fofweb.com/History/HistRefMain.asp?iPin=ELAI0029&SID=2&DatabaseName=Ancient+and+Medieval+History+Online&InputText=%22order+of+Calatrava%22&SearchStyle=&dTitle=Bobadilla%2C+Francisco+de&TabRecordType=All+Records&BioCountPass=1&SubCountPass=2&DocCountPass=0&ImgCountPass=0&MapCountPass=0&FedCountPass=&MedCountPass=0&NewsCountPass=0&RecPosition=3&AmericanData=&WomenData=&AFHCData=&IndianData=&WorldData=&AncientData=Set&GovernmentData=

     

    Columbus' defenders really should learn some history first.

     

    Have a very nice day

    -fgalkin

  13. Why? Would it bring the dead back?

    (Btw, yes, I've left America for Europe and I'm loving it. Even with Obama's bull**** new foreign asset reporting law.).

     

    Have a very nice day.

    -fgalkin

     

    People who are offended by Columbus should go back to wherever their ancestors came from. It's the only morally right thing to do.

  14. I've never been able to finish playing this build- the ogre didn't spawn (!) and Dyrford Ruins are bugged to hell and just impossible (I've had two game-breaking bugs there). Looking forward to actually finishing the game in the next build :)

     

    Have a very nice day.

    -fgalkin

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...