Jump to content

talharbash

Members
  • Posts

    137
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by talharbash

  1. http://www.guy****er.com/2014/07/20/episode-38-obsidian-entertainment/

     

    In this interview that went up yesterday, it sounds like the pre-order option for the beta is being taken down before the beta goes live (which also indicates probably no early access). I'm sure we'll hear about this in the next update, but yeah just a forewarning if that does turn out to be true.

     

    Interesting. The beta comes out right after Gamescom where the game will be available to play for everyone.

     

    Heh. I can see some people getting pissed about this.

  2. Hopefully someone can answer this. I tried to skim this thread for an answer but no luck.

     

    Will there be Steam Early Access for the beta? I have not pledged on Kickstarter, but I REALLY want to get in on the beta and start helping the devs out.

     

    Look at Larian Studios' Divinity Original Sin which had backer beta AND Steam Early Access. 

     

    Will Obsidian give us the option to get in on the backer beta through Steam Early Access?

     

    I've seen both a "no" to Early Access because they do not want to get bad impressions for an early version, and I've seen articles discussing Early Access with Obsidian where it seemed they were planning on it.

     

    It's not known at this time if an EA with Steam will be released alongside the beta like Inxile did. From what I recall, there was a lot of confusion when Inxile did that and some backers resented it. I'm not taking sides on what happened (I didn't care either way), but it didn't go through without some controversy.

  3.  

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arcanum:_Of_Steamworks_and_Magick_Obscura#Sequel

     

    Doesn't Sierra own the IP or did Troika have ownership of it?

     

    Neither. Sierra did, but they folded. Their IP's, including Arcanum have been now for a long time at Activision.

     

     

    The problem with not calling it Arcanum II is that no one except some forum goers will really know it's sequel, and if Obsidian calls it a "spiritual" sequel Activision will likely take action.

  4. As a longtime fan of crpgs, I'm considering donating some money to the cause, but at this point I have no idea what further monies will be going toward. 

     

    I read from the News and Announcements section that the game is now "feature locked," which makes it seem as if any further monies donated won't go toward the addition of new features.

     

    Where then would the money go, assuming it still goes toward development (I don't have experience in backing these projects)? Would it be used to support debugging/testing? Thanks!

     

    Too much money can be a bad thing.

     

    In any case, why not wait for their next crowd funding campaign? They already said they planned to have a new one this year.

  5. You most certainly can fake those vides. Forsaken Fortress did if not exactly that, something dangerously close to it.

     

     

    The devs of Forsaken Fortress explained they had all these cool ideas they were trying out and building the tech for. That's what we see in the early videos.

     

    Then they put it together into a game and found it would barely run because of all the resources it consumed. By that time it was already too late. They have run out of money and are only working on it part time.

     

    A real shame since the concept was pretty good.

  6. I think it would've been good for Obsidian to have created an E3 trailer with some gameplay footage like the teaser from last year and showed us this trailer. That may have alleviated some of the outrage. And then show us a more polished extended video of the same game play footage in a couple of months.

     

    This is a very good point. Even if it meant taking someone off from real work for a week to prepare it for an E3 backer update.

     

    What I find interesting is 99% of people who follow E3 do it off the gaming media sites. We don't actually go to E3 (it's largely an industry thing anyway). An E3 backer update would have been in much better taste.

     

    Ayway, horse beaten to death. This will be my last post on the topic. I just wanted to express my frustration with this decision.

  7. I get a sense of irony in this thread considering this is an update thread on the whole game; alpha to beta, area design, environmental art, systems design, UI, character art, narrative, programming, VFX including a youtube video on one of these effects, audio... but it seems a lot of people aren't so much interested in this and are more interested in an unfinished, unpolished gameplay video shown at E3.

     

    I think people just want the same access the game media folks are getting. That's all.

  8.  

    Granted, I'm not telling you you should, specifically, gratuitously fund them. I'm just saying, whether you do or don't, or how much, should be based on much better factors.

    Indeed. Personally, whether or not I back another Obsidian kickstarter for big dollars will depend solely on what PoE turns out to be like. If it's all that they said they would do, then they'll see (much) more of my money on another kickstarter. If not, they won't. Simple as that. I don't personally care when I get to see gameplay footage. I care about the end product.

     

     

    I now only back (crowd funded games) by small indie teams that aren't going crazy with PR out of the gate. I honestly find it's better suited to the experience I expect from this sort of patronage.

     

    Whenever there's a business there's PR and this sort of behind the door exclusivity leaves a bad taste in my mouth. It's not a slap in the face or the end of the world or anything. It just shows where Obsidian's priorities are. Those priorities are probably good ones to have (if you're Obsidian).

×
×
  • Create New...