Wrath of Dagon

Well, good for you. I did read the article, it confirmed what I've read before, so I didn't have any reason to doubt it. Edit: What I really wanted to link was an excerpt I read from a book about a Communist party disciplinary hearing in Stalin's Soviet Union, and ask if that doesn't sound like a bunch of SJW's going after the latest victim, but I just don't remember enough information to be able to find it. It's also a bit funny that there's a GBS quote right above your post.

You didn't quote the entire opening of the article, it has a different meaning than you imply. And how was I to know he was a troll? The article was high on the search results, and even the publisher of the website said he was taken in (he didn't take the article down though, or put any kind of warning on it).

I know, I try to keep things simple with you.

If you search, you can find any number of articles explaining how SJW's are Stalinists. Here's one:http://thoughtcatalog.com/joshua-goldberg/2014/12/when-social-justice-warriors-attack-one-tumblr-users-experience/ Or you can read Jonah Goldberg's "Liberal fascism". He was almost beaten to death simply for opposing the BLM agenda. How's that for freedom of speech? And Hilzilla has just called everyone a racist. "The power of acute observation is often mistaken for cynicism by those who have not got it." - George Bernard Shaw

Nah, that's more like brown-shirt fascism that anything else And those are different how? This is coming from the left, enabled by one of the major parties. How is that Stalinism as opposed to **** just being ****, though? Kind of like Rangers fans stabbing Celtic ones. No, because this is political and racial.

Speaking of Stalinism: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/10/04/alabama-high-school-student-assaulted-over-black-lives-matter-post-police-say.html

He's not attacking anybody, because he used the word "strong" the left is feigning a freak out and using it to attack Trump. Here's the full quote: https://twitter.com/RubinReport/status/783036190018588672

People wanted Pence to run for President, but he decided against it. Probably would still have lost to Trump as he'd run on the normal Cocpublican corporatist agenda. Bill Clinton trashes Obolacare: http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/03/bill-clinton-trashes-obamacare-at-event-calls-it-crazy-system/

Not only that but their tactics are Stalinist tactics, though without the executions so far.

Hilzilla wanted to drone Assange: http://truepundit.com/under-intense-pressure-to-silence-wikileaks-secretary-of-state-hillary-clinton-proposed-drone-strike-on-julian-assange/ Given the huge amount of damage those revelations did to the country, hard for me to hold it against her. And to rub salt into the wound, US is paying for the traitor's sex change operation.

Yeah, SJW's were called "Stalinists" when she was born.

"Egypt actually adopted the US constitution " Just the thought of that concept makes this post the funniest and most ridiculous suggestion anyone has said in ages on these forums, this even makes volo's comments seem normal Well done WOD, you definitely get the famous and revered BruceVC award for the " most absurd and unlikely post to make " Sometimes you guys really are funny and the funniest thing about it is I dont think you mean to be humorous This is what Gromnir said: "given how well the arab spring worked out, perhaps a different kinda Constitution would be a good starting point." Since we were discussing alternatives to the US Constitution, I asked if he meant "different to the US Constitution". The SA constitution wasn't written by Marxists ....what are you talking about ? The SA constitution was and is very well constructed, there are certain things the USA could adopt but it wouldn't be suitable overall for a country like the USA For example we believe that everyone has a right to dignity so certain aspects of Freedom of Speech would be considered very offensive to the dignity of people so that would immediately clash with the USA view around Freedom of Speech which we have often discussed As I often try to explain to you guys in the USA we believe in free speech but certain words are considered unacceptable. This seems to be contradictory but this is because of the history of Apartheid which has a degree of relevance in our laws You're saying it wasn't written by the ANC? And you just confirmed your believes are Marxist, because you believe only in "approved" free speech. I would recommend the latest copy of the Soviet constitution to you and Ginsberg, it's very well constructed and hits all the SJW g-spots.

Yeah, OK, let's just disband them. And yes, they'll probably decide that if Hilzilla wins, so it's up to all freedom loving people to make sure she doesn't win.

Are you saying Egypt actually adopted the US constitution and that's why Arab spring didn't work out? She wasn't just talking about Egypt, she's clearly saying anyone writing a constitution should take SA constitution as a model, not US constitution. Of course the SA constitution was written by Marxists, while US constitution is probably the most anti-Marxist document ever written, so there you are.

OK, I thought even with quotes it was obvious it wasn't exactly what she said. Here's the exact quote

Hilzilla doesn't have to pick someone extreme for the Supreme Court, all liberals vote as a block. Besides, even most Republicans voted for Ginsberg, she's plenty extreme enough: "screw the US constitution, replace it with South African constitution" lol

Yes, I want the giant evil government to oppress terrorists and criminals. Targets do matter.

Aside from Farage still alive, pretty much. Building walls is an excellent idea. Hilzilla has experience, but her experience is setting areas of the world on fire, compromising national security, and selling out the country. At least Trump ran a multi-billion dollar empire, that's relevant experience, by contrast Obola wouldn't be even able to run a McDonald's. Johnson isn't viable, so his qualifications are irrelevant, not that he has any. Why haven't you come up with a lame ass butchering of Johnson's name yet, man ? Isn't his name already a joke? Also I don't take him seriously enough to bother, besides I don't really hate him, I just think he's a loon.

Building walls is an excellent idea. Hilzilla has experience, but her experience is setting areas of the world on fire, compromising national security, and selling out the country. At least Trump ran a multi-billion dollar empire, that's relevant experience, by contrast Obola wouldn't be even able to run a McDonald's. Johnson isn't viable, so his qualifications are irrelevant, not that he has any.

Trump may be ruthless when he thinks it's necessary, but I don't think he's a nasty guy. Now maybe I'm wrong about this, but I heard he cheated on his former wife with a married woman; then boasted about it. Seems nasty to me. You're not wrong, but cheating and boasting doesn't make someone nasty, although certainly you would hope for better from your leaders. But as I keep saying, you have to choose the lesser evil, and Trump will be far better on the Supreme Court, open borders, national security and a host of other issues. Hilzilla will finish the destruction that Obola has wrought. I'm not comparing Trump to either man, but Churchill certainly had a ton of faults and was considered eccentric and a buccaneer, and even the sainted George Washington had some very questionable business dealings: https://books.google.com/books?id=o6NoAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA72&lpg=PA72&dq=george+washington+enlisted+men+land+grant&source=bl&ots=mif3j1QUYF&sig=eNR6Ie9L7hsqj0ECiGA8AzN1jxQ&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjUqY_vi7rPAhUn6oMKHeRnC_IQ6AEIOTAF#v=onepage&q=george%20washington%20enlisted%20men%20land%20grant&f=false

It would not be surprising if he did. They are both terrible, yay. Trump may be ruthless when he thinks it's necessary, but I don't think he's a nasty guy. http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/09/trump-makes-his-case-in-pittsburgh/501335/ And he's helped a lot of people over the years, though certainly he has his faults.

Trump may be childish, but Hilzilla is unstable and vindictive. Did Trump ever humiliate one of his best friends in front of other employees to the point that the guy committed suicide?

Besides Trump is hated by both Democrats and Republicans, so he would be impeached if he steps out of line. There would be no restrictions on Hilzilla's power.

She also character assassinated the child victim. I know a lawyer is ethically obligated to defend her client, but I don't think it's required to do what she did.

One day we'll reach peak stupidity, but that day hasn't come yet.