Still the dmg is too low. His only job would be stunning ememies. kinda suck if you consider that rogue should deal some dmg. If you want dps/support, better take ranged cipher.
Rogue with bow is a wasted potential fo that class.
Actually, there's an argument against firearms here. The problem with guns vs bows/xbows is that guns are limited to an 8m range for the blunderbuss and 10m for pistols and arqabus, whereas bows/xbows have a 12m range. Where this factors into the equation is when you want to fire that first shot of an engagement as a rogue, you'd really like to be behind your front line tanks so that the enemy will charge after them and not you. Thus, arming your front liners with the shorter ranged weapons while your rogue hides behind them with a 12m range weapon lets you take the shot without suddenly becoming the target of every charging enemy.
So, if you want the best of both worlds, long range and high damage, then an arbalest would seem like the perfect mix.
Just an observation.
10m is good enough. even 8 is not a problem. Played that on potd and I saw no problem. I know a lot of people prefer arbalest because of prone but pistols or blunderbuss are still better than bow for rogue.
